Cargando…

Interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection

BACKGROUND: Sonotubometry is a non-invasive means of assessing Eustachian tube (ET) function. Its interpretation remains a complex task with questionable results due to wide variation between trials. A study was conducted to ascertain whether the measurement of phase shift in sonotubometric signals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amoako-Tuffour, Yaw, Garland, Philip, Bance, Manohar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0151-5
_version_ 1782437056946896896
author Amoako-Tuffour, Yaw
Garland, Philip
Bance, Manohar
author_facet Amoako-Tuffour, Yaw
Garland, Philip
Bance, Manohar
author_sort Amoako-Tuffour, Yaw
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sonotubometry is a non-invasive means of assessing Eustachian tube (ET) function. Its interpretation remains a complex task with questionable results due to wide variation between trials. A study was conducted to ascertain whether the measurement of phase shift in sonotubometric signals would be a more reliable indicator of ET patency than fluctuating Sound Pressure Level (SPL). METHODS: The ears of six healthy participants and two participants with patulous ET (PET) were probed with a 100 Hz signal. Five recordings of SPL were performed at the external auditory canal. Cross-correlation was performed among filtered SPL signals and among extracted phase shift waveforms. Peak coefficients were averaged to provide a measure of waveform similarity between trials. RESULTS: Mean peak cross correlation coefficient for SPL signal measured 0.603 ± 0.057 Standard Error of Mean (SEM) whilst that for Phase-Shift signal measured 0.884 ± 0.027 (SEM). All normal participants demonstrated an observable phase change between the ear and nasal signal during swallowing indicating an acoustic impedance change during the event. For the PET patients tested, the phase measurements in ear and nasal signals follow one another reasonably closely, indicating little or no impedance change during swallowing. It is thought that this impedance change is indicative of opening of the ET in normal patients, and the lack impedance change indicates ET either remaining open or remaining closed throughout the swallow. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental data suggest that phase-shift detection is a more consistent means of interpreting sonotubometric data than SPL analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4902982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49029822016-06-12 Interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection Amoako-Tuffour, Yaw Garland, Philip Bance, Manohar J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Sonotubometry is a non-invasive means of assessing Eustachian tube (ET) function. Its interpretation remains a complex task with questionable results due to wide variation between trials. A study was conducted to ascertain whether the measurement of phase shift in sonotubometric signals would be a more reliable indicator of ET patency than fluctuating Sound Pressure Level (SPL). METHODS: The ears of six healthy participants and two participants with patulous ET (PET) were probed with a 100 Hz signal. Five recordings of SPL were performed at the external auditory canal. Cross-correlation was performed among filtered SPL signals and among extracted phase shift waveforms. Peak coefficients were averaged to provide a measure of waveform similarity between trials. RESULTS: Mean peak cross correlation coefficient for SPL signal measured 0.603 ± 0.057 Standard Error of Mean (SEM) whilst that for Phase-Shift signal measured 0.884 ± 0.027 (SEM). All normal participants demonstrated an observable phase change between the ear and nasal signal during swallowing indicating an acoustic impedance change during the event. For the PET patients tested, the phase measurements in ear and nasal signals follow one another reasonably closely, indicating little or no impedance change during swallowing. It is thought that this impedance change is indicative of opening of the ET in normal patients, and the lack impedance change indicates ET either remaining open or remaining closed throughout the swallow. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental data suggest that phase-shift detection is a more consistent means of interpreting sonotubometric data than SPL analysis. BioMed Central 2016-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4902982/ /pubmed/27287432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0151-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Amoako-Tuffour, Yaw
Garland, Philip
Bance, Manohar
Interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection
title Interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection
title_full Interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection
title_fullStr Interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection
title_short Interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection
title_sort interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0151-5
work_keys_str_mv AT amoakotuffouryaw interpretationofsonotubometricdatabasedonphaseshiftdetection
AT garlandphilip interpretationofsonotubometricdatabasedonphaseshiftdetection
AT bancemanohar interpretationofsonotubometricdatabasedonphaseshiftdetection