Cargando…
Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The peer review process is a cornerstone of biomedical research. We aimed to evaluate the impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review for biomedical publications. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase,...
Autores principales: | Bruce, Rachel, Chauvin, Anthony, Trinquart, Ludovic, Ravaud, Philippe, Boutron, Isabelle |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0631-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
por: Kovanis, Michail, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data
por: Kovanis, Michail, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)