Cargando…

Optimal Duration of Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Nonsystematic Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of cardiac arrhythmias and an independent risk factor for stroke. Despite major advances in monitoring strategies, clinicians tend to miss the diagnoses of AF and especially paroxysmal AF due mainly to its asymptomatic presentation and the rather limi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hariri, Essa, Hachem, Ahmad, Sarkis, Georges, Nasr, Samer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4903126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27314027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5704963
_version_ 1782437071211724800
author Hariri, Essa
Hachem, Ahmad
Sarkis, Georges
Nasr, Samer
author_facet Hariri, Essa
Hachem, Ahmad
Sarkis, Georges
Nasr, Samer
author_sort Hariri, Essa
collection PubMed
description Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of cardiac arrhythmias and an independent risk factor for stroke. Despite major advances in monitoring strategies, clinicians tend to miss the diagnoses of AF and especially paroxysmal AF due mainly to its asymptomatic presentation and the rather limited duration dedicated for monitoring for AF after a stroke, which is 24 hours as per the current recommended guidelines. Hence, determining the optimal duration of monitoring for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after acute ischemic stroke remains a matter of debate. Multiple trials were published in regard to this matter using both invasive and noninvasive monitoring strategies for different monitoring periods. The data provided by these trials showcase strong evidence suggesting a longer monitoring strategy beyond 24 hours is associated with higher detection rates of AF, with the higher percentage of patients detected consequently receiving proper secondary stroke prevention with anticoagulation and thus justifying the cost-effectiveness of such measures. Overall, we thus conclude that increasing the monitoring duration for AF after a cryptogenic stroke to at least 72 hours will indeed enhance the detection rates, but the cost-effectiveness of this monitoring strategy compared to longer monitoring durations is yet to be established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4903126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49031262016-06-16 Optimal Duration of Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Nonsystematic Review Hariri, Essa Hachem, Ahmad Sarkis, Georges Nasr, Samer Biomed Res Int Review Article Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of cardiac arrhythmias and an independent risk factor for stroke. Despite major advances in monitoring strategies, clinicians tend to miss the diagnoses of AF and especially paroxysmal AF due mainly to its asymptomatic presentation and the rather limited duration dedicated for monitoring for AF after a stroke, which is 24 hours as per the current recommended guidelines. Hence, determining the optimal duration of monitoring for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after acute ischemic stroke remains a matter of debate. Multiple trials were published in regard to this matter using both invasive and noninvasive monitoring strategies for different monitoring periods. The data provided by these trials showcase strong evidence suggesting a longer monitoring strategy beyond 24 hours is associated with higher detection rates of AF, with the higher percentage of patients detected consequently receiving proper secondary stroke prevention with anticoagulation and thus justifying the cost-effectiveness of such measures. Overall, we thus conclude that increasing the monitoring duration for AF after a cryptogenic stroke to at least 72 hours will indeed enhance the detection rates, but the cost-effectiveness of this monitoring strategy compared to longer monitoring durations is yet to be established. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4903126/ /pubmed/27314027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5704963 Text en Copyright © 2016 Essa Hariri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hariri, Essa
Hachem, Ahmad
Sarkis, Georges
Nasr, Samer
Optimal Duration of Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Nonsystematic Review
title Optimal Duration of Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Nonsystematic Review
title_full Optimal Duration of Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Nonsystematic Review
title_fullStr Optimal Duration of Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Nonsystematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Duration of Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Nonsystematic Review
title_short Optimal Duration of Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Nonsystematic Review
title_sort optimal duration of monitoring for atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke: a nonsystematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4903126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27314027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5704963
work_keys_str_mv AT haririessa optimaldurationofmonitoringforatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokeanonsystematicreview
AT hachemahmad optimaldurationofmonitoringforatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokeanonsystematicreview
AT sarkisgeorges optimaldurationofmonitoringforatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokeanonsystematicreview
AT nasrsamer optimaldurationofmonitoringforatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokeanonsystematicreview