Cargando…

The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation

Aiming to define the optimal treatment of large and giant aneurysms (LGAs) in the anterior circulation, we present our surgical protocol and patient outcome. A series of 42 patients with intracavernous LGAs (n = 16), paraclinoid (C2) LGAs (n = 17), and peripheral (middle cerebral artery—MCA or anter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imai, Hideaki, Watanabe, Katsushige, Miyagishima, Takaaki, Yoshimoto, Yuhei, Kin, Taichi, Nakatomi, Hirofumi, Saito, Nobuhito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0721-z
_version_ 1782437084850552832
author Imai, Hideaki
Watanabe, Katsushige
Miyagishima, Takaaki
Yoshimoto, Yuhei
Kin, Taichi
Nakatomi, Hirofumi
Saito, Nobuhito
author_facet Imai, Hideaki
Watanabe, Katsushige
Miyagishima, Takaaki
Yoshimoto, Yuhei
Kin, Taichi
Nakatomi, Hirofumi
Saito, Nobuhito
author_sort Imai, Hideaki
collection PubMed
description Aiming to define the optimal treatment of large and giant aneurysms (LGAs) in the anterior circulation, we present our surgical protocol and patient outcome. A series of 42 patients with intracavernous LGAs (n = 16), paraclinoid (C2) LGAs (n = 17), and peripheral (middle cerebral artery—MCA or anterior cerebral artery—ACA) LGAs (n = 9) were treated after bypass under motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. Preoperatively, three categories of ischemic tolerance during internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion were defined on conventional angiography: optimal, suboptimal, and insufficient collaterals. Accordingly, three types of bypass: low flow (LFB), middle flow (MFB) and high flow (HFB) were applied for the cases with optimal, suboptimal, and insufficient collaterals, respectively. Outcome was evaluated by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). All patients had excellent GOS score except one, who suffered a major ischemic stroke immediately after surgery for a paraclinoid lesion. Forty-one patients were followed up for 87.1 ± 40.1 months (range 13–144 months). Intracavernous LGAs were all treated by proximal occlusion with bypass surgery. Of paraclinoid LGA patients, 15 patients had direct clipping under suction decompression and other 2 patients with recurrent aneurysms had ICA (C2) proximal clipping with HFB. MEP monitoring guided for temporary clipping time and clip repositioning, observing significant MEP changes for up to 6 min duration. Of 9 peripheral LGAs patients 7 MCA LGAs had reconstructive clipping (n = 4) or trapping (n = 3) with bypass including LFB in 3 cases, MFB in 1 and HFB in 1. Two ACA LGAs had clipping (n = 1) or trapping (n = 1) with A3-A3 bypass. The applied protocol provided excellent results in intracavernous, paraclinoid, and peripheral thrombosed LGAs of the anterior circulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4904025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49040252016-06-28 The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation Imai, Hideaki Watanabe, Katsushige Miyagishima, Takaaki Yoshimoto, Yuhei Kin, Taichi Nakatomi, Hirofumi Saito, Nobuhito Neurosurg Rev Original Article Aiming to define the optimal treatment of large and giant aneurysms (LGAs) in the anterior circulation, we present our surgical protocol and patient outcome. A series of 42 patients with intracavernous LGAs (n = 16), paraclinoid (C2) LGAs (n = 17), and peripheral (middle cerebral artery—MCA or anterior cerebral artery—ACA) LGAs (n = 9) were treated after bypass under motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. Preoperatively, three categories of ischemic tolerance during internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion were defined on conventional angiography: optimal, suboptimal, and insufficient collaterals. Accordingly, three types of bypass: low flow (LFB), middle flow (MFB) and high flow (HFB) were applied for the cases with optimal, suboptimal, and insufficient collaterals, respectively. Outcome was evaluated by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). All patients had excellent GOS score except one, who suffered a major ischemic stroke immediately after surgery for a paraclinoid lesion. Forty-one patients were followed up for 87.1 ± 40.1 months (range 13–144 months). Intracavernous LGAs were all treated by proximal occlusion with bypass surgery. Of paraclinoid LGA patients, 15 patients had direct clipping under suction decompression and other 2 patients with recurrent aneurysms had ICA (C2) proximal clipping with HFB. MEP monitoring guided for temporary clipping time and clip repositioning, observing significant MEP changes for up to 6 min duration. Of 9 peripheral LGAs patients 7 MCA LGAs had reconstructive clipping (n = 4) or trapping (n = 3) with bypass including LFB in 3 cases, MFB in 1 and HFB in 1. Two ACA LGAs had clipping (n = 1) or trapping (n = 1) with A3-A3 bypass. The applied protocol provided excellent results in intracavernous, paraclinoid, and peripheral thrombosed LGAs of the anterior circulation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-05-06 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4904025/ /pubmed/27149879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0721-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Imai, Hideaki
Watanabe, Katsushige
Miyagishima, Takaaki
Yoshimoto, Yuhei
Kin, Taichi
Nakatomi, Hirofumi
Saito, Nobuhito
The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation
title The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation
title_full The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation
title_fullStr The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation
title_full_unstemmed The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation
title_short The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation
title_sort outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0721-z
work_keys_str_mv AT imaihideaki theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT watanabekatsushige theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT miyagishimatakaaki theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT yoshimotoyuhei theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT kintaichi theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT nakatomihirofumi theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT saitonobuhito theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT imaihideaki outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT watanabekatsushige outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT miyagishimatakaaki outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT yoshimotoyuhei outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT kintaichi outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT nakatomihirofumi outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation
AT saitonobuhito outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation