Cargando…
The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation
Aiming to define the optimal treatment of large and giant aneurysms (LGAs) in the anterior circulation, we present our surgical protocol and patient outcome. A series of 42 patients with intracavernous LGAs (n = 16), paraclinoid (C2) LGAs (n = 17), and peripheral (middle cerebral artery—MCA or anter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0721-z |
_version_ | 1782437084850552832 |
---|---|
author | Imai, Hideaki Watanabe, Katsushige Miyagishima, Takaaki Yoshimoto, Yuhei Kin, Taichi Nakatomi, Hirofumi Saito, Nobuhito |
author_facet | Imai, Hideaki Watanabe, Katsushige Miyagishima, Takaaki Yoshimoto, Yuhei Kin, Taichi Nakatomi, Hirofumi Saito, Nobuhito |
author_sort | Imai, Hideaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aiming to define the optimal treatment of large and giant aneurysms (LGAs) in the anterior circulation, we present our surgical protocol and patient outcome. A series of 42 patients with intracavernous LGAs (n = 16), paraclinoid (C2) LGAs (n = 17), and peripheral (middle cerebral artery—MCA or anterior cerebral artery—ACA) LGAs (n = 9) were treated after bypass under motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. Preoperatively, three categories of ischemic tolerance during internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion were defined on conventional angiography: optimal, suboptimal, and insufficient collaterals. Accordingly, three types of bypass: low flow (LFB), middle flow (MFB) and high flow (HFB) were applied for the cases with optimal, suboptimal, and insufficient collaterals, respectively. Outcome was evaluated by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). All patients had excellent GOS score except one, who suffered a major ischemic stroke immediately after surgery for a paraclinoid lesion. Forty-one patients were followed up for 87.1 ± 40.1 months (range 13–144 months). Intracavernous LGAs were all treated by proximal occlusion with bypass surgery. Of paraclinoid LGA patients, 15 patients had direct clipping under suction decompression and other 2 patients with recurrent aneurysms had ICA (C2) proximal clipping with HFB. MEP monitoring guided for temporary clipping time and clip repositioning, observing significant MEP changes for up to 6 min duration. Of 9 peripheral LGAs patients 7 MCA LGAs had reconstructive clipping (n = 4) or trapping (n = 3) with bypass including LFB in 3 cases, MFB in 1 and HFB in 1. Two ACA LGAs had clipping (n = 1) or trapping (n = 1) with A3-A3 bypass. The applied protocol provided excellent results in intracavernous, paraclinoid, and peripheral thrombosed LGAs of the anterior circulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4904025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49040252016-06-28 The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation Imai, Hideaki Watanabe, Katsushige Miyagishima, Takaaki Yoshimoto, Yuhei Kin, Taichi Nakatomi, Hirofumi Saito, Nobuhito Neurosurg Rev Original Article Aiming to define the optimal treatment of large and giant aneurysms (LGAs) in the anterior circulation, we present our surgical protocol and patient outcome. A series of 42 patients with intracavernous LGAs (n = 16), paraclinoid (C2) LGAs (n = 17), and peripheral (middle cerebral artery—MCA or anterior cerebral artery—ACA) LGAs (n = 9) were treated after bypass under motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. Preoperatively, three categories of ischemic tolerance during internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion were defined on conventional angiography: optimal, suboptimal, and insufficient collaterals. Accordingly, three types of bypass: low flow (LFB), middle flow (MFB) and high flow (HFB) were applied for the cases with optimal, suboptimal, and insufficient collaterals, respectively. Outcome was evaluated by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). All patients had excellent GOS score except one, who suffered a major ischemic stroke immediately after surgery for a paraclinoid lesion. Forty-one patients were followed up for 87.1 ± 40.1 months (range 13–144 months). Intracavernous LGAs were all treated by proximal occlusion with bypass surgery. Of paraclinoid LGA patients, 15 patients had direct clipping under suction decompression and other 2 patients with recurrent aneurysms had ICA (C2) proximal clipping with HFB. MEP monitoring guided for temporary clipping time and clip repositioning, observing significant MEP changes for up to 6 min duration. Of 9 peripheral LGAs patients 7 MCA LGAs had reconstructive clipping (n = 4) or trapping (n = 3) with bypass including LFB in 3 cases, MFB in 1 and HFB in 1. Two ACA LGAs had clipping (n = 1) or trapping (n = 1) with A3-A3 bypass. The applied protocol provided excellent results in intracavernous, paraclinoid, and peripheral thrombosed LGAs of the anterior circulation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-05-06 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4904025/ /pubmed/27149879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0721-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Imai, Hideaki Watanabe, Katsushige Miyagishima, Takaaki Yoshimoto, Yuhei Kin, Taichi Nakatomi, Hirofumi Saito, Nobuhito The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation |
title | The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation |
title_full | The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation |
title_fullStr | The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation |
title_full_unstemmed | The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation |
title_short | The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation |
title_sort | outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0721-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imaihideaki theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT watanabekatsushige theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT miyagishimatakaaki theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT yoshimotoyuhei theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT kintaichi theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT nakatomihirofumi theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT saitonobuhito theoutcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT imaihideaki outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT watanabekatsushige outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT miyagishimatakaaki outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT yoshimotoyuhei outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT kintaichi outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT nakatomihirofumi outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation AT saitonobuhito outcomeofasurgicalprotocolbasedonischemiaoverprotectioninlargeandgiantaneurysmsoftheanteriorcerebralcirculation |