Cargando…

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage without Fluoroscopic Guidance for Extraluminal Complicated Cysts

Background. Endoscopic ultrasound- (EUS-) guided drainage is generally performed under fluoroscopic guidance. However, improvements in endoscopic and EUS techniques and experience have led to questions regarding the usefulness of fluoroscopy. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the safety a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nam, Hyeong Seok, Kim, Hyung Wook, Kang, Dae Hwan, Choi, Cheol Woong, Park, Su Bum, Kim, Su Jin, Ryu, Dae Gon, Jeon, Joon Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1249064
_version_ 1782437095989575680
author Nam, Hyeong Seok
Kim, Hyung Wook
Kang, Dae Hwan
Choi, Cheol Woong
Park, Su Bum
Kim, Su Jin
Ryu, Dae Gon
Jeon, Joon Ho
author_facet Nam, Hyeong Seok
Kim, Hyung Wook
Kang, Dae Hwan
Choi, Cheol Woong
Park, Su Bum
Kim, Su Jin
Ryu, Dae Gon
Jeon, Joon Ho
author_sort Nam, Hyeong Seok
collection PubMed
description Background. Endoscopic ultrasound- (EUS-) guided drainage is generally performed under fluoroscopic guidance. However, improvements in endoscopic and EUS techniques and experience have led to questions regarding the usefulness of fluoroscopy. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided drainage of extraluminal complicated cysts without fluoroscopic guidance. Methods. Patients who had undergone nonfluoroscopic EUS-guided drainage of extraluminal complicated cysts were enrolled. Drainage was performed via a transgastric, transduodenal, or transrectal approach. Single or double 7 Fr double pigtail stents were inserted. Results. Seventeen procedures were performed in 15 patients in peripancreatic fluid collections (n = 13) and pelvic abscesses (n = 4). The median lesion size was 7.1 cm (range: 2.8–13.0 cm), and the mean time spent per procedure was 26.2 ± 9.8 minutes (range: 16–50 minutes). Endoscopic drainage was successful in 16 of 17 (94.1%) procedures. There were no complications. All patients experienced symptomatic improvement and revealed partial to complete resolution according to follow-up computed tomography findings. Two patients developed recurrent cysts that were drained during repeat procedures, with eventual complete resolution. Conclusion. EUS-guided drainage without fluoroscopic guidance is a technically feasible, safe, and effective procedure for the treatment of extraluminal complicated cysts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4904102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49041022016-06-16 Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage without Fluoroscopic Guidance for Extraluminal Complicated Cysts Nam, Hyeong Seok Kim, Hyung Wook Kang, Dae Hwan Choi, Cheol Woong Park, Su Bum Kim, Su Jin Ryu, Dae Gon Jeon, Joon Ho Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study Background. Endoscopic ultrasound- (EUS-) guided drainage is generally performed under fluoroscopic guidance. However, improvements in endoscopic and EUS techniques and experience have led to questions regarding the usefulness of fluoroscopy. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided drainage of extraluminal complicated cysts without fluoroscopic guidance. Methods. Patients who had undergone nonfluoroscopic EUS-guided drainage of extraluminal complicated cysts were enrolled. Drainage was performed via a transgastric, transduodenal, or transrectal approach. Single or double 7 Fr double pigtail stents were inserted. Results. Seventeen procedures were performed in 15 patients in peripancreatic fluid collections (n = 13) and pelvic abscesses (n = 4). The median lesion size was 7.1 cm (range: 2.8–13.0 cm), and the mean time spent per procedure was 26.2 ± 9.8 minutes (range: 16–50 minutes). Endoscopic drainage was successful in 16 of 17 (94.1%) procedures. There were no complications. All patients experienced symptomatic improvement and revealed partial to complete resolution according to follow-up computed tomography findings. Two patients developed recurrent cysts that were drained during repeat procedures, with eventual complete resolution. Conclusion. EUS-guided drainage without fluoroscopic guidance is a technically feasible, safe, and effective procedure for the treatment of extraluminal complicated cysts. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4904102/ /pubmed/27313606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1249064 Text en Copyright © 2016 Hyeong Seok Nam et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Nam, Hyeong Seok
Kim, Hyung Wook
Kang, Dae Hwan
Choi, Cheol Woong
Park, Su Bum
Kim, Su Jin
Ryu, Dae Gon
Jeon, Joon Ho
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage without Fluoroscopic Guidance for Extraluminal Complicated Cysts
title Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage without Fluoroscopic Guidance for Extraluminal Complicated Cysts
title_full Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage without Fluoroscopic Guidance for Extraluminal Complicated Cysts
title_fullStr Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage without Fluoroscopic Guidance for Extraluminal Complicated Cysts
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage without Fluoroscopic Guidance for Extraluminal Complicated Cysts
title_short Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage without Fluoroscopic Guidance for Extraluminal Complicated Cysts
title_sort endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage without fluoroscopic guidance for extraluminal complicated cysts
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1249064
work_keys_str_mv AT namhyeongseok endoscopicultrasoundguideddrainagewithoutfluoroscopicguidanceforextraluminalcomplicatedcysts
AT kimhyungwook endoscopicultrasoundguideddrainagewithoutfluoroscopicguidanceforextraluminalcomplicatedcysts
AT kangdaehwan endoscopicultrasoundguideddrainagewithoutfluoroscopicguidanceforextraluminalcomplicatedcysts
AT choicheolwoong endoscopicultrasoundguideddrainagewithoutfluoroscopicguidanceforextraluminalcomplicatedcysts
AT parksubum endoscopicultrasoundguideddrainagewithoutfluoroscopicguidanceforextraluminalcomplicatedcysts
AT kimsujin endoscopicultrasoundguideddrainagewithoutfluoroscopicguidanceforextraluminalcomplicatedcysts
AT ryudaegon endoscopicultrasoundguideddrainagewithoutfluoroscopicguidanceforextraluminalcomplicatedcysts
AT jeonjoonho endoscopicultrasoundguideddrainagewithoutfluoroscopicguidanceforextraluminalcomplicatedcysts