Comparative Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Yeast ID Panel and Remel RapID Yeast Plus System for Yeast Identification

Becton Dickinson Phoenix Yeast ID Panel was compared to the Remel RapID Yeast Plus System using 150 recent clinical yeast isolates and the API 20C AUX system to resolve discrepant results. The concordance rate between the Yeast ID Panel and the RapID Yeast Plus System (without arbitration) was 93.3%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grant, Michelle L., Parajuli, Shobha, Deleon-Gonsalves, Raquel, Potula, Raghava, Truant, Allan L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27366167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4094932
_version_ 1782437168359145472
author Grant, Michelle L.
Parajuli, Shobha
Deleon-Gonsalves, Raquel
Potula, Raghava
Truant, Allan L.
author_facet Grant, Michelle L.
Parajuli, Shobha
Deleon-Gonsalves, Raquel
Potula, Raghava
Truant, Allan L.
author_sort Grant, Michelle L.
collection PubMed
description Becton Dickinson Phoenix Yeast ID Panel was compared to the Remel RapID Yeast Plus System using 150 recent clinical yeast isolates and the API 20C AUX system to resolve discrepant results. The concordance rate between the Yeast ID Panel and the RapID Yeast Plus System (without arbitration) was 93.3% with 97.3% (146/150) and 95.3% (143/150) of the isolates correctly identified by the Becton Dickinson Phoenix and the Remel RapID, respectively, with arbitration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4904582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49045822016-06-30 Comparative Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Yeast ID Panel and Remel RapID Yeast Plus System for Yeast Identification Grant, Michelle L. Parajuli, Shobha Deleon-Gonsalves, Raquel Potula, Raghava Truant, Allan L. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Research Article Becton Dickinson Phoenix Yeast ID Panel was compared to the Remel RapID Yeast Plus System using 150 recent clinical yeast isolates and the API 20C AUX system to resolve discrepant results. The concordance rate between the Yeast ID Panel and the RapID Yeast Plus System (without arbitration) was 93.3% with 97.3% (146/150) and 95.3% (143/150) of the isolates correctly identified by the Becton Dickinson Phoenix and the Remel RapID, respectively, with arbitration. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4904582/ /pubmed/27366167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4094932 Text en Copyright © 2016 Michelle L. Grant et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grant, Michelle L.
Parajuli, Shobha
Deleon-Gonsalves, Raquel
Potula, Raghava
Truant, Allan L.
Comparative Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Yeast ID Panel and Remel RapID Yeast Plus System for Yeast Identification
title Comparative Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Yeast ID Panel and Remel RapID Yeast Plus System for Yeast Identification
title_full Comparative Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Yeast ID Panel and Remel RapID Yeast Plus System for Yeast Identification
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Yeast ID Panel and Remel RapID Yeast Plus System for Yeast Identification
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Yeast ID Panel and Remel RapID Yeast Plus System for Yeast Identification
title_short Comparative Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Yeast ID Panel and Remel RapID Yeast Plus System for Yeast Identification
title_sort comparative evaluation of the bd phoenix yeast id panel and remel rapid yeast plus system for yeast identification
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27366167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4094932
work_keys_str_mv AT grantmichellel comparativeevaluationofthebdphoenixyeastidpanelandremelrapidyeastplussystemforyeastidentification
AT parajulishobha comparativeevaluationofthebdphoenixyeastidpanelandremelrapidyeastplussystemforyeastidentification
AT deleongonsalvesraquel comparativeevaluationofthebdphoenixyeastidpanelandremelrapidyeastplussystemforyeastidentification
AT potularaghava comparativeevaluationofthebdphoenixyeastidpanelandremelrapidyeastplussystemforyeastidentification
AT truantallanl comparativeevaluationofthebdphoenixyeastidpanelandremelrapidyeastplussystemforyeastidentification

Ejemplares similares