Cargando…
A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
Background. The increasing demand for endoscopic procedures coincides with the paradigm shift in health care delivery that emphasizes efficient use of existing resources. However, there is limited literature on the range of endoscopy unit efficiencies. Methods. A time and motion analysis of patient...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2574076 |
_version_ | 1782437186352709632 |
---|---|
author | Almeida, Rowena Paterson, William G. Craig, Nancy Hookey, Lawrence |
author_facet | Almeida, Rowena Paterson, William G. Craig, Nancy Hookey, Lawrence |
author_sort | Almeida, Rowena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The increasing demand for endoscopic procedures coincides with the paradigm shift in health care delivery that emphasizes efficient use of existing resources. However, there is limited literature on the range of endoscopy unit efficiencies. Methods. A time and motion analysis of patient flow through the Hotel-Dieu Hospital (Kingston, Ontario) endoscopy unit was followed by qualitative interviews. Procedures were directly observed in three segments: individual endoscopy room use, preprocedure/recovery room, and overall endoscopy unit utilization. Results. Data were collected for 137 procedures in the endoscopy room, 139 procedures in the preprocedure room, and 143 procedures for overall room utilization. The mean duration spent in the endoscopy room was 31.47 min for an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 52.93 min for a colonoscopy, 30.47 min for a flexible sigmoidoscopy, and 66.88 min for a double procedure. The procedure itself accounted for 8.11 min, 34.24 min, 9.02 min, and 39.13 min for the above procedures, respectively. The focused interviews identified the scheduling template as a major area of operational inefficiency. Conclusions. Despite reasonable procedure times for all except colonoscopies, the endoscopy room durations exceed the allocated times, reflecting the impact of non-procedure-related factors and the need for a revised scheduling template. Endoscopy units have unique operational characteristics and identification of process inefficiencies can lead to targeted quality improvement initiatives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4904661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49046612016-06-30 A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit Almeida, Rowena Paterson, William G. Craig, Nancy Hookey, Lawrence Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Research Article Background. The increasing demand for endoscopic procedures coincides with the paradigm shift in health care delivery that emphasizes efficient use of existing resources. However, there is limited literature on the range of endoscopy unit efficiencies. Methods. A time and motion analysis of patient flow through the Hotel-Dieu Hospital (Kingston, Ontario) endoscopy unit was followed by qualitative interviews. Procedures were directly observed in three segments: individual endoscopy room use, preprocedure/recovery room, and overall endoscopy unit utilization. Results. Data were collected for 137 procedures in the endoscopy room, 139 procedures in the preprocedure room, and 143 procedures for overall room utilization. The mean duration spent in the endoscopy room was 31.47 min for an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 52.93 min for a colonoscopy, 30.47 min for a flexible sigmoidoscopy, and 66.88 min for a double procedure. The procedure itself accounted for 8.11 min, 34.24 min, 9.02 min, and 39.13 min for the above procedures, respectively. The focused interviews identified the scheduling template as a major area of operational inefficiency. Conclusions. Despite reasonable procedure times for all except colonoscopies, the endoscopy room durations exceed the allocated times, reflecting the impact of non-procedure-related factors and the need for a revised scheduling template. Endoscopy units have unique operational characteristics and identification of process inefficiencies can lead to targeted quality improvement initiatives. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4904661/ /pubmed/27446830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2574076 Text en Copyright © 2016 Rowena Almeida et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Almeida, Rowena Paterson, William G. Craig, Nancy Hookey, Lawrence A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit |
title | A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit |
title_full | A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit |
title_fullStr | A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit |
title_full_unstemmed | A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit |
title_short | A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit |
title_sort | patient flow analysis: identification of process inefficiencies and workflow metrics at an ambulatory endoscopy unit |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2574076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almeidarowena apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit AT patersonwilliamg apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit AT craignancy apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit AT hookeylawrence apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit AT almeidarowena patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit AT patersonwilliamg patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit AT craignancy patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit AT hookeylawrence patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit |