Cargando…

A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit

Background. The increasing demand for endoscopic procedures coincides with the paradigm shift in health care delivery that emphasizes efficient use of existing resources. However, there is limited literature on the range of endoscopy unit efficiencies. Methods. A time and motion analysis of patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida, Rowena, Paterson, William G., Craig, Nancy, Hookey, Lawrence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2574076
_version_ 1782437186352709632
author Almeida, Rowena
Paterson, William G.
Craig, Nancy
Hookey, Lawrence
author_facet Almeida, Rowena
Paterson, William G.
Craig, Nancy
Hookey, Lawrence
author_sort Almeida, Rowena
collection PubMed
description Background. The increasing demand for endoscopic procedures coincides with the paradigm shift in health care delivery that emphasizes efficient use of existing resources. However, there is limited literature on the range of endoscopy unit efficiencies. Methods. A time and motion analysis of patient flow through the Hotel-Dieu Hospital (Kingston, Ontario) endoscopy unit was followed by qualitative interviews. Procedures were directly observed in three segments: individual endoscopy room use, preprocedure/recovery room, and overall endoscopy unit utilization. Results. Data were collected for 137 procedures in the endoscopy room, 139 procedures in the preprocedure room, and 143 procedures for overall room utilization. The mean duration spent in the endoscopy room was 31.47 min for an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 52.93 min for a colonoscopy, 30.47 min for a flexible sigmoidoscopy, and 66.88 min for a double procedure. The procedure itself accounted for 8.11 min, 34.24 min, 9.02 min, and 39.13 min for the above procedures, respectively. The focused interviews identified the scheduling template as a major area of operational inefficiency. Conclusions. Despite reasonable procedure times for all except colonoscopies, the endoscopy room durations exceed the allocated times, reflecting the impact of non-procedure-related factors and the need for a revised scheduling template. Endoscopy units have unique operational characteristics and identification of process inefficiencies can lead to targeted quality improvement initiatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4904661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49046612016-06-30 A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit Almeida, Rowena Paterson, William G. Craig, Nancy Hookey, Lawrence Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Research Article Background. The increasing demand for endoscopic procedures coincides with the paradigm shift in health care delivery that emphasizes efficient use of existing resources. However, there is limited literature on the range of endoscopy unit efficiencies. Methods. A time and motion analysis of patient flow through the Hotel-Dieu Hospital (Kingston, Ontario) endoscopy unit was followed by qualitative interviews. Procedures were directly observed in three segments: individual endoscopy room use, preprocedure/recovery room, and overall endoscopy unit utilization. Results. Data were collected for 137 procedures in the endoscopy room, 139 procedures in the preprocedure room, and 143 procedures for overall room utilization. The mean duration spent in the endoscopy room was 31.47 min for an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 52.93 min for a colonoscopy, 30.47 min for a flexible sigmoidoscopy, and 66.88 min for a double procedure. The procedure itself accounted for 8.11 min, 34.24 min, 9.02 min, and 39.13 min for the above procedures, respectively. The focused interviews identified the scheduling template as a major area of operational inefficiency. Conclusions. Despite reasonable procedure times for all except colonoscopies, the endoscopy room durations exceed the allocated times, reflecting the impact of non-procedure-related factors and the need for a revised scheduling template. Endoscopy units have unique operational characteristics and identification of process inefficiencies can lead to targeted quality improvement initiatives. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4904661/ /pubmed/27446830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2574076 Text en Copyright © 2016 Rowena Almeida et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Almeida, Rowena
Paterson, William G.
Craig, Nancy
Hookey, Lawrence
A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title_full A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title_fullStr A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title_full_unstemmed A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title_short A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit
title_sort patient flow analysis: identification of process inefficiencies and workflow metrics at an ambulatory endoscopy unit
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2574076
work_keys_str_mv AT almeidarowena apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT patersonwilliamg apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT craignancy apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT hookeylawrence apatientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT almeidarowena patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT patersonwilliamg patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT craignancy patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit
AT hookeylawrence patientflowanalysisidentificationofprocessinefficienciesandworkflowmetricsatanambulatoryendoscopyunit