Cargando…

Unexpected Findings in Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Their Clinical Significance

Aims. To identify the prevalence of colonic and extraenteric incidental findings in magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and their clinical significance. Methods. We retrospectively analysed 470 MRE studies carried out between March 2012 and 2014. Incidental findings were defined as those not expec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ravindran, Srivathsan, Hancox, Sarah Helen, Barlow, Neil, Dunk, Arthur, Howlett, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4020569
_version_ 1782437189106270208
author Ravindran, Srivathsan
Hancox, Sarah Helen
Barlow, Neil
Dunk, Arthur
Howlett, David
author_facet Ravindran, Srivathsan
Hancox, Sarah Helen
Barlow, Neil
Dunk, Arthur
Howlett, David
author_sort Ravindran, Srivathsan
collection PubMed
description Aims. To identify the prevalence of colonic and extraenteric incidental findings in magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and their clinical significance. Methods. We retrospectively analysed 470 MRE studies carried out between March 2012 and 2014. Incidental findings were defined as those not expected from or made apparent on the referral. MRE reports were reviewed for colonic and extraenteric findings, subcategorised into “clinically significant” and “insignificant.” Follow-up was identified from the electronic patient record. Results. The majority of MRE requests were made for inflammatory bowel disease (97%). In total, 114 incidental findings were noted in 94 (20%) scans performed. There were 29 “colonic” findings (25%) with 55% having a diagnosis of colitis. Out of 85 extraenteric findings, ovarian cysts (25%), renal cysts (10%), and abdominal lymphadenopathy (9%) were the commonest. Cumulatively, 59 cases were clinically significant (52%); of these, 30 findings were not previously diagnosed, amounting to 26% of all incidental findings. This led to intervention in seven patients. Conclusions. Incidental findings are common in MRE and there is a substantial proportion that is clinically significant and requires further investigation. There need to be stratification of risk and employment of local guidelines in order to achieve this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4904694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49046942016-06-30 Unexpected Findings in Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Their Clinical Significance Ravindran, Srivathsan Hancox, Sarah Helen Barlow, Neil Dunk, Arthur Howlett, David Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Research Article Aims. To identify the prevalence of colonic and extraenteric incidental findings in magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and their clinical significance. Methods. We retrospectively analysed 470 MRE studies carried out between March 2012 and 2014. Incidental findings were defined as those not expected from or made apparent on the referral. MRE reports were reviewed for colonic and extraenteric findings, subcategorised into “clinically significant” and “insignificant.” Follow-up was identified from the electronic patient record. Results. The majority of MRE requests were made for inflammatory bowel disease (97%). In total, 114 incidental findings were noted in 94 (20%) scans performed. There were 29 “colonic” findings (25%) with 55% having a diagnosis of colitis. Out of 85 extraenteric findings, ovarian cysts (25%), renal cysts (10%), and abdominal lymphadenopathy (9%) were the commonest. Cumulatively, 59 cases were clinically significant (52%); of these, 30 findings were not previously diagnosed, amounting to 26% of all incidental findings. This led to intervention in seven patients. Conclusions. Incidental findings are common in MRE and there is a substantial proportion that is clinically significant and requires further investigation. There need to be stratification of risk and employment of local guidelines in order to achieve this. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4904694/ /pubmed/27446837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4020569 Text en Copyright © 2016 Srivathsan Ravindran et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ravindran, Srivathsan
Hancox, Sarah Helen
Barlow, Neil
Dunk, Arthur
Howlett, David
Unexpected Findings in Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Their Clinical Significance
title Unexpected Findings in Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Their Clinical Significance
title_full Unexpected Findings in Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Their Clinical Significance
title_fullStr Unexpected Findings in Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Their Clinical Significance
title_full_unstemmed Unexpected Findings in Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Their Clinical Significance
title_short Unexpected Findings in Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Their Clinical Significance
title_sort unexpected findings in magnetic resonance enterography and their clinical significance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4020569
work_keys_str_mv AT ravindransrivathsan unexpectedfindingsinmagneticresonanceenterographyandtheirclinicalsignificance
AT hancoxsarahhelen unexpectedfindingsinmagneticresonanceenterographyandtheirclinicalsignificance
AT barlowneil unexpectedfindingsinmagneticresonanceenterographyandtheirclinicalsignificance
AT dunkarthur unexpectedfindingsinmagneticresonanceenterographyandtheirclinicalsignificance
AT howlettdavid unexpectedfindingsinmagneticresonanceenterographyandtheirclinicalsignificance