Cargando…

Safety and Feasibility of Quantitative Multiplexed Cytokine Analysis From Office-Based Vitreous Aspiration

PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to evaluate the safety of office-based vitreous sampling, and determine the utility of these samples with multiplex cytokine analysis. METHODS: Vitreous samples were collected from office-based needle aspiration and the rate of adverse events during follow-up wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghodasra, Devon H., Fante, Ryan, Gardner, Thomas W., Langue, Michael, Niziol, Leslie M., Besirli, Cagri, Cohen, Steven R., Dedania, Vaidehi S., Demirci, Hakan, Jain, Nieraj, Jayasundera, K. Thiran, Johnson, Mark W., Kalyani, Partho S., Rao, Rajesh C., Zacks, David N., Sundstrom, Jeffrey M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27273720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18721
_version_ 1782437203364806656
author Ghodasra, Devon H.
Fante, Ryan
Gardner, Thomas W.
Langue, Michael
Niziol, Leslie M.
Besirli, Cagri
Cohen, Steven R.
Dedania, Vaidehi S.
Demirci, Hakan
Jain, Nieraj
Jayasundera, K. Thiran
Johnson, Mark W.
Kalyani, Partho S.
Rao, Rajesh C.
Zacks, David N.
Sundstrom, Jeffrey M.
author_facet Ghodasra, Devon H.
Fante, Ryan
Gardner, Thomas W.
Langue, Michael
Niziol, Leslie M.
Besirli, Cagri
Cohen, Steven R.
Dedania, Vaidehi S.
Demirci, Hakan
Jain, Nieraj
Jayasundera, K. Thiran
Johnson, Mark W.
Kalyani, Partho S.
Rao, Rajesh C.
Zacks, David N.
Sundstrom, Jeffrey M.
author_sort Ghodasra, Devon H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to evaluate the safety of office-based vitreous sampling, and determine the utility of these samples with multiplex cytokine analysis. METHODS: Vitreous samples were collected from office-based needle aspiration and the rate of adverse events during follow-up was reviewed. The vitreous cytokine concentrations in a subset of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) were analyzed using a 42 plex-cytokine bead array. These results were compared with vitreous cytokine concentrations in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and controls (macular hole, epiretinal membrane, symptomatic vitreous floaters) from pars plana vitrectomy. RESULTS: An adequate volume of vitreous fluid (100–200 μL) was obtained in 52 (88%) of 59 office-based sampling attempts. The average length of follow-up was 300 days (range, 42–926 days). There were no complications, including cataract, retinal tear or detachment, and endophthalmitis. Two patients (3%) had posterior vitreous detachments within 3 months. Vitreous cytokine concentrations were measured in 44 patients: 14 controls, 13 with DME, and 17 with PDR. The concentration of ADAM11, CXCL-10, IL-8, and PDGF-A were higher in PDR compared with controls and DME. The concentration of IL-6 was higher in PDR compared with controls, but not compared with DME. CONCLUSIONS: Office-based vitreous aspiration is safe and yields high-quality samples for multiplex vitreous cytokine analysis. Significant elevations of vitreous cytokines were found in PDR compared with DME and controls, including the novel finding of elevated ADAM11. As such, office-based aspiration is a safe and effective means to identify vitreous factors associated with vitreoretinal disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4904801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49048012016-12-01 Safety and Feasibility of Quantitative Multiplexed Cytokine Analysis From Office-Based Vitreous Aspiration Ghodasra, Devon H. Fante, Ryan Gardner, Thomas W. Langue, Michael Niziol, Leslie M. Besirli, Cagri Cohen, Steven R. Dedania, Vaidehi S. Demirci, Hakan Jain, Nieraj Jayasundera, K. Thiran Johnson, Mark W. Kalyani, Partho S. Rao, Rajesh C. Zacks, David N. Sundstrom, Jeffrey M. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Retina PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to evaluate the safety of office-based vitreous sampling, and determine the utility of these samples with multiplex cytokine analysis. METHODS: Vitreous samples were collected from office-based needle aspiration and the rate of adverse events during follow-up was reviewed. The vitreous cytokine concentrations in a subset of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) were analyzed using a 42 plex-cytokine bead array. These results were compared with vitreous cytokine concentrations in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and controls (macular hole, epiretinal membrane, symptomatic vitreous floaters) from pars plana vitrectomy. RESULTS: An adequate volume of vitreous fluid (100–200 μL) was obtained in 52 (88%) of 59 office-based sampling attempts. The average length of follow-up was 300 days (range, 42–926 days). There were no complications, including cataract, retinal tear or detachment, and endophthalmitis. Two patients (3%) had posterior vitreous detachments within 3 months. Vitreous cytokine concentrations were measured in 44 patients: 14 controls, 13 with DME, and 17 with PDR. The concentration of ADAM11, CXCL-10, IL-8, and PDGF-A were higher in PDR compared with controls and DME. The concentration of IL-6 was higher in PDR compared with controls, but not compared with DME. CONCLUSIONS: Office-based vitreous aspiration is safe and yields high-quality samples for multiplex vitreous cytokine analysis. Significant elevations of vitreous cytokines were found in PDR compared with DME and controls, including the novel finding of elevated ADAM11. As such, office-based aspiration is a safe and effective means to identify vitreous factors associated with vitreoretinal disease. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016-06-07 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4904801/ /pubmed/27273720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18721 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Retina
Ghodasra, Devon H.
Fante, Ryan
Gardner, Thomas W.
Langue, Michael
Niziol, Leslie M.
Besirli, Cagri
Cohen, Steven R.
Dedania, Vaidehi S.
Demirci, Hakan
Jain, Nieraj
Jayasundera, K. Thiran
Johnson, Mark W.
Kalyani, Partho S.
Rao, Rajesh C.
Zacks, David N.
Sundstrom, Jeffrey M.
Safety and Feasibility of Quantitative Multiplexed Cytokine Analysis From Office-Based Vitreous Aspiration
title Safety and Feasibility of Quantitative Multiplexed Cytokine Analysis From Office-Based Vitreous Aspiration
title_full Safety and Feasibility of Quantitative Multiplexed Cytokine Analysis From Office-Based Vitreous Aspiration
title_fullStr Safety and Feasibility of Quantitative Multiplexed Cytokine Analysis From Office-Based Vitreous Aspiration
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Feasibility of Quantitative Multiplexed Cytokine Analysis From Office-Based Vitreous Aspiration
title_short Safety and Feasibility of Quantitative Multiplexed Cytokine Analysis From Office-Based Vitreous Aspiration
title_sort safety and feasibility of quantitative multiplexed cytokine analysis from office-based vitreous aspiration
topic Retina
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27273720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18721
work_keys_str_mv AT ghodasradevonh safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT fanteryan safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT gardnerthomasw safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT languemichael safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT niziollesliem safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT besirlicagri safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT cohenstevenr safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT dedaniavaidehis safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT demircihakan safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT jainnieraj safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT jayasunderakthiran safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT johnsonmarkw safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT kalyaniparthos safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT raorajeshc safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT zacksdavidn safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration
AT sundstromjeffreym safetyandfeasibilityofquantitativemultiplexedcytokineanalysisfromofficebasedvitreousaspiration