Cargando…

Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice

Patients often have lower (white coat effect) or higher (masked effect) ambulatory/home blood pressure readings compared with clinic measurements, resulting in misdiagnosis of hypertension. The present study assessed whether blood pressure and patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheppard, James P., Stevens, Richard, Gill, Paramjit, Martin, Una, Godwin, Marshall, Hanley, Janet, Heneghan, Carl, Hobbs, F.D. Richard, Mant, Jonathan, McKinstry, Brian, Myers, Martin, Nunan, David, Ward, Alison, Williams, Bryan, McManus, Richard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4905620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27001299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.07108
_version_ 1782437281836040192
author Sheppard, James P.
Stevens, Richard
Gill, Paramjit
Martin, Una
Godwin, Marshall
Hanley, Janet
Heneghan, Carl
Hobbs, F.D. Richard
Mant, Jonathan
McKinstry, Brian
Myers, Martin
Nunan, David
Ward, Alison
Williams, Bryan
McManus, Richard J.
author_facet Sheppard, James P.
Stevens, Richard
Gill, Paramjit
Martin, Una
Godwin, Marshall
Hanley, Janet
Heneghan, Carl
Hobbs, F.D. Richard
Mant, Jonathan
McKinstry, Brian
Myers, Martin
Nunan, David
Ward, Alison
Williams, Bryan
McManus, Richard J.
author_sort Sheppard, James P.
collection PubMed
description Patients often have lower (white coat effect) or higher (masked effect) ambulatory/home blood pressure readings compared with clinic measurements, resulting in misdiagnosis of hypertension. The present study assessed whether blood pressure and patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict the difference between ambulatory/home and clinic blood pressure readings (the home–clinic difference). A linear regression model predicting the home–clinic blood pressure difference was derived in 2 data sets measuring automated clinic and ambulatory/home blood pressure (n=991) using candidate predictors identified from a literature review. The model was validated in 4 further data sets (n=1172) using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. A masked effect was associated with male sex, a positive clinic blood pressure change (difference between consecutive measurements during a single visit), and a diagnosis of hypertension. Increasing age, clinic blood pressure level, and pulse pressure were associated with a white coat effect. The model showed good calibration across data sets (Pearson correlation, 0.48–0.80) and performed well-predicting ambulatory hypertension (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.79 [systolic]; 0.87; 0.85–0.89 [diastolic]). Used as a triaging tool for ambulatory monitoring, the model improved classification of a patient’s blood pressure status compared with other guideline recommended approaches (93% [92% to 95%] classified correctly; United States, 73% [70% to 75%]; Canada, 74% [71% to 77%]; United Kingdom, 78% [76% to 81%]). This study demonstrates that patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict a patient’s ambulatory blood pressure. Usage of this prediction tool for triaging of ambulatory monitoring could result in more accurate diagnosis of hypertension and hence more appropriate treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4905620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49056202016-06-28 Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice Sheppard, James P. Stevens, Richard Gill, Paramjit Martin, Una Godwin, Marshall Hanley, Janet Heneghan, Carl Hobbs, F.D. Richard Mant, Jonathan McKinstry, Brian Myers, Martin Nunan, David Ward, Alison Williams, Bryan McManus, Richard J. Hypertension Original Articles Patients often have lower (white coat effect) or higher (masked effect) ambulatory/home blood pressure readings compared with clinic measurements, resulting in misdiagnosis of hypertension. The present study assessed whether blood pressure and patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict the difference between ambulatory/home and clinic blood pressure readings (the home–clinic difference). A linear regression model predicting the home–clinic blood pressure difference was derived in 2 data sets measuring automated clinic and ambulatory/home blood pressure (n=991) using candidate predictors identified from a literature review. The model was validated in 4 further data sets (n=1172) using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. A masked effect was associated with male sex, a positive clinic blood pressure change (difference between consecutive measurements during a single visit), and a diagnosis of hypertension. Increasing age, clinic blood pressure level, and pulse pressure were associated with a white coat effect. The model showed good calibration across data sets (Pearson correlation, 0.48–0.80) and performed well-predicting ambulatory hypertension (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.79 [systolic]; 0.87; 0.85–0.89 [diastolic]). Used as a triaging tool for ambulatory monitoring, the model improved classification of a patient’s blood pressure status compared with other guideline recommended approaches (93% [92% to 95%] classified correctly; United States, 73% [70% to 75%]; Canada, 74% [71% to 77%]; United Kingdom, 78% [76% to 81%]). This study demonstrates that patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict a patient’s ambulatory blood pressure. Usage of this prediction tool for triaging of ambulatory monitoring could result in more accurate diagnosis of hypertension and hence more appropriate treatment. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 2016-05 2016-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4905620/ /pubmed/27001299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.07108 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Hypertension is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sheppard, James P.
Stevens, Richard
Gill, Paramjit
Martin, Una
Godwin, Marshall
Hanley, Janet
Heneghan, Carl
Hobbs, F.D. Richard
Mant, Jonathan
McKinstry, Brian
Myers, Martin
Nunan, David
Ward, Alison
Williams, Bryan
McManus, Richard J.
Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice
title Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice
title_full Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice
title_short Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice
title_sort predicting out-of-office blood pressure in the clinic (proof-bp): derivation and validation of a tool to improve the accuracy of blood pressure measurement in clinical practice
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4905620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27001299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.07108
work_keys_str_mv AT sheppardjamesp predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT stevensrichard predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT gillparamjit predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT martinuna predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT godwinmarshall predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT hanleyjanet predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT heneghancarl predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT hobbsfdrichard predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT mantjonathan predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT mckinstrybrian predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT myersmartin predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT nunandavid predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT wardalison predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT williamsbryan predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice
AT mcmanusrichardj predictingoutofofficebloodpressureintheclinicproofbpderivationandvalidationofatooltoimprovetheaccuracyofbloodpressuremeasurementinclinicalpractice