Cargando…

Use of B-mode ultrasonography for measuring femoral muscle thickness in dogs

Assessment of muscle mass is important for evaluating muscle function and rehabilitation outcomes. Ultrasound has recently been successfully used to estimate muscle mass in humans by measuring muscle thickness. This study attempted to standardize procedures for measuring femoral muscle thickness ult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SAKAEDA, Kanako, SHIMIZU, Miki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4905835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26832997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.15-0512
_version_ 1782437304170708992
author SAKAEDA, Kanako
SHIMIZU, Miki
author_facet SAKAEDA, Kanako
SHIMIZU, Miki
author_sort SAKAEDA, Kanako
collection PubMed
description Assessment of muscle mass is important for evaluating muscle function and rehabilitation outcomes. Ultrasound has recently been successfully used to estimate muscle mass in humans by measuring muscle thickness. This study attempted to standardize procedures for measuring femoral muscle thickness ultrasonographically, as well as quantify the reliability and validity of ultrasound evaluations of muscle thickness compared to measurements made by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in dogs. We evaluated the quadriceps femoris (QF), biceps femoris (BF), semitendinosus (ST) and semimembranosus (SM) muscles of 10 clinically healthy Beagle dogs. Scans were taken in 5 different sections divided equally between the greater trochanter and proximal patella. MRI was performed, followed by T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured with MRI, and muscle thickness was measured with MRI and ultrasonography. The thickness of the QF, BF and ST muscles as measured by ultrasound at slices 1–3 (from the proximal end to the middle of the femur), 2–4 (middle of the femur) and 2 (more proximal than the middle of the femur), respectively, was correlated with muscle thickness and CSA as measured by MRI. These sites showed a flat interface between muscle and transducer and were situated over belly muscle. No correlation between measurement types was seen in SM muscle. We must confirm this assessment method for various breeds, sizes, ages and muscle pathologies in dogs, thereby confirming that muscle thickness as measured ultrasonographically can reflect muscle function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4905835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49058352016-06-15 Use of B-mode ultrasonography for measuring femoral muscle thickness in dogs SAKAEDA, Kanako SHIMIZU, Miki J Vet Med Sci Internal Medicine Assessment of muscle mass is important for evaluating muscle function and rehabilitation outcomes. Ultrasound has recently been successfully used to estimate muscle mass in humans by measuring muscle thickness. This study attempted to standardize procedures for measuring femoral muscle thickness ultrasonographically, as well as quantify the reliability and validity of ultrasound evaluations of muscle thickness compared to measurements made by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in dogs. We evaluated the quadriceps femoris (QF), biceps femoris (BF), semitendinosus (ST) and semimembranosus (SM) muscles of 10 clinically healthy Beagle dogs. Scans were taken in 5 different sections divided equally between the greater trochanter and proximal patella. MRI was performed, followed by T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured with MRI, and muscle thickness was measured with MRI and ultrasonography. The thickness of the QF, BF and ST muscles as measured by ultrasound at slices 1–3 (from the proximal end to the middle of the femur), 2–4 (middle of the femur) and 2 (more proximal than the middle of the femur), respectively, was correlated with muscle thickness and CSA as measured by MRI. These sites showed a flat interface between muscle and transducer and were situated over belly muscle. No correlation between measurement types was seen in SM muscle. We must confirm this assessment method for various breeds, sizes, ages and muscle pathologies in dogs, thereby confirming that muscle thickness as measured ultrasonographically can reflect muscle function. The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2016-01-30 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4905835/ /pubmed/26832997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.15-0512 Text en ©2016 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
SAKAEDA, Kanako
SHIMIZU, Miki
Use of B-mode ultrasonography for measuring femoral muscle thickness in dogs
title Use of B-mode ultrasonography for measuring femoral muscle thickness in dogs
title_full Use of B-mode ultrasonography for measuring femoral muscle thickness in dogs
title_fullStr Use of B-mode ultrasonography for measuring femoral muscle thickness in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Use of B-mode ultrasonography for measuring femoral muscle thickness in dogs
title_short Use of B-mode ultrasonography for measuring femoral muscle thickness in dogs
title_sort use of b-mode ultrasonography for measuring femoral muscle thickness in dogs
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4905835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26832997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.15-0512
work_keys_str_mv AT sakaedakanako useofbmodeultrasonographyformeasuringfemoralmusclethicknessindogs
AT shimizumiki useofbmodeultrasonographyformeasuringfemoralmusclethicknessindogs