Cargando…
Comparison between two physiotherapy protocols for patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis
[Purpose] To compare the effects of two physiotherapy protocols for chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis. [Subjects and Methods] This is a prospective, randomized study, in chronic kidney disease patients 18 years of age or older on dialysis. Sessions for each group (were conducted three time...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4905929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1644 |
_version_ | 1782437322701144064 |
---|---|
author | Neto, José Roberto Sostena Figueiredo e Castro, Letícia Magalhães Santos de Oliveira, Fernanda Silva, Andréia Maria Maria dos Reis, Luciana Quirino, Ana Paula Assunção Dragosavac, Desanka Kosour, Carolina |
author_facet | Neto, José Roberto Sostena Figueiredo e Castro, Letícia Magalhães Santos de Oliveira, Fernanda Silva, Andréia Maria Maria dos Reis, Luciana Quirino, Ana Paula Assunção Dragosavac, Desanka Kosour, Carolina |
author_sort | Neto, José Roberto Sostena |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] To compare the effects of two physiotherapy protocols for chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis. [Subjects and Methods] This is a prospective, randomized study, in chronic kidney disease patients 18 years of age or older on dialysis. Sessions for each group (were conducted three times per week for a total of 10 sessions), during hemodialysis. Respiratory muscle strength (maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure), peak expiratory flow, and peripheral muscle strength were evaluated. The study group received motor and respiratory physiotherapy, and the control group received motor physiotherapy alone. [Results] We observed a significant increase in the maximal inspiratory pressure in the study group in the 5th and 10th sessions and in the maximal expiratory pressure in the 1st session, peak flow in the 1st and 10th sessions, and dynamometry in the 10th session. In the control group, there was a significant decrease in maximal inspiratory pressure in the 5th and 10th sessions, and in maximal expiratory pressure in the 10th session, peak flow in the 5th and 10th sessions, and dynamometry in the 5th session. [Conclusion] Implementation of motor physiotherapy combined with respiratory physiotherapy may have contributed to the improvement of the variables analyzed in the study group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4905929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49059292016-06-16 Comparison between two physiotherapy protocols for patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis Neto, José Roberto Sostena Figueiredo e Castro, Letícia Magalhães Santos de Oliveira, Fernanda Silva, Andréia Maria Maria dos Reis, Luciana Quirino, Ana Paula Assunção Dragosavac, Desanka Kosour, Carolina J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] To compare the effects of two physiotherapy protocols for chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis. [Subjects and Methods] This is a prospective, randomized study, in chronic kidney disease patients 18 years of age or older on dialysis. Sessions for each group (were conducted three times per week for a total of 10 sessions), during hemodialysis. Respiratory muscle strength (maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure), peak expiratory flow, and peripheral muscle strength were evaluated. The study group received motor and respiratory physiotherapy, and the control group received motor physiotherapy alone. [Results] We observed a significant increase in the maximal inspiratory pressure in the study group in the 5th and 10th sessions and in the maximal expiratory pressure in the 1st session, peak flow in the 1st and 10th sessions, and dynamometry in the 10th session. In the control group, there was a significant decrease in maximal inspiratory pressure in the 5th and 10th sessions, and in maximal expiratory pressure in the 10th session, peak flow in the 5th and 10th sessions, and dynamometry in the 5th session. [Conclusion] Implementation of motor physiotherapy combined with respiratory physiotherapy may have contributed to the improvement of the variables analyzed in the study group. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016-05-31 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4905929/ /pubmed/27313390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1644 Text en 2016©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Neto, José Roberto Sostena Figueiredo e Castro, Letícia Magalhães Santos de Oliveira, Fernanda Silva, Andréia Maria Maria dos Reis, Luciana Quirino, Ana Paula Assunção Dragosavac, Desanka Kosour, Carolina Comparison between two physiotherapy protocols for patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis |
title | Comparison between two physiotherapy protocols for patients with chronic
kidney disease on dialysis |
title_full | Comparison between two physiotherapy protocols for patients with chronic
kidney disease on dialysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison between two physiotherapy protocols for patients with chronic
kidney disease on dialysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between two physiotherapy protocols for patients with chronic
kidney disease on dialysis |
title_short | Comparison between two physiotherapy protocols for patients with chronic
kidney disease on dialysis |
title_sort | comparison between two physiotherapy protocols for patients with chronic
kidney disease on dialysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4905929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT netojoserobertosostena comparisonbetweentwophysiotherapyprotocolsforpatientswithchronickidneydiseaseondialysis AT figueiredoecastroleticiamagalhaes comparisonbetweentwophysiotherapyprotocolsforpatientswithchronickidneydiseaseondialysis AT santosdeoliveirafernanda comparisonbetweentwophysiotherapyprotocolsforpatientswithchronickidneydiseaseondialysis AT silvaandreiamaria comparisonbetweentwophysiotherapyprotocolsforpatientswithchronickidneydiseaseondialysis AT mariadosreisluciana comparisonbetweentwophysiotherapyprotocolsforpatientswithchronickidneydiseaseondialysis AT quirinoanapaulaassuncao comparisonbetweentwophysiotherapyprotocolsforpatientswithchronickidneydiseaseondialysis AT dragosavacdesanka comparisonbetweentwophysiotherapyprotocolsforpatientswithchronickidneydiseaseondialysis AT kosourcarolina comparisonbetweentwophysiotherapyprotocolsforpatientswithchronickidneydiseaseondialysis |