Cargando…

Potentiation rather than distraction in a trace fear conditioning procedure

Trace conditioning procedures are defined by the introduction of a trace interval between conditioned stimulus (CS, e.g. noise or light) offset and unconditioned stimulus (US, e.g. footshock). The introduction of an additional stimulus as a distractor has been suggested to increase the attentional d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pezze, M.A., Marshall, H.J., Cassaday, H.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27060226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.04.003
_version_ 1782437390985461760
author Pezze, M.A.
Marshall, H.J.
Cassaday, H.J.
author_facet Pezze, M.A.
Marshall, H.J.
Cassaday, H.J.
author_sort Pezze, M.A.
collection PubMed
description Trace conditioning procedures are defined by the introduction of a trace interval between conditioned stimulus (CS, e.g. noise or light) offset and unconditioned stimulus (US, e.g. footshock). The introduction of an additional stimulus as a distractor has been suggested to increase the attentional demands of the task and to extend the usefulness of the behavioural model. In Experiment 1, the CS was noise and the distractor was provided by an intermittent light. In Experiment 2, the CS was light and the distractor was provided by an intermittent noise. In both experiments, the introduction of a 10s trace interval weakened associative learning compared with that seen in a 0s delay conditioned group. However, there was no consistent evidence of distraction. On the contrary, in Experiment 1, associative learning was stronger (in both trace and delay conditioned groups) for rats conditioned also in the presence of the intermittent light. In Experiment 2, there was no such effect when the roles of the stimuli were reversed. The results of Experiment 2 did however confirm the particular salience of the noise stimulus. The finding of increased associative learning dependent on salience is consistent with arousal-mediated effects on associative learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4906245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49062452016-07-01 Potentiation rather than distraction in a trace fear conditioning procedure Pezze, M.A. Marshall, H.J. Cassaday, H.J. Behav Processes Article Trace conditioning procedures are defined by the introduction of a trace interval between conditioned stimulus (CS, e.g. noise or light) offset and unconditioned stimulus (US, e.g. footshock). The introduction of an additional stimulus as a distractor has been suggested to increase the attentional demands of the task and to extend the usefulness of the behavioural model. In Experiment 1, the CS was noise and the distractor was provided by an intermittent light. In Experiment 2, the CS was light and the distractor was provided by an intermittent noise. In both experiments, the introduction of a 10s trace interval weakened associative learning compared with that seen in a 0s delay conditioned group. However, there was no consistent evidence of distraction. On the contrary, in Experiment 1, associative learning was stronger (in both trace and delay conditioned groups) for rats conditioned also in the presence of the intermittent light. In Experiment 2, there was no such effect when the roles of the stimuli were reversed. The results of Experiment 2 did however confirm the particular salience of the noise stimulus. The finding of increased associative learning dependent on salience is consistent with arousal-mediated effects on associative learning. Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4906245/ /pubmed/27060226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.04.003 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pezze, M.A.
Marshall, H.J.
Cassaday, H.J.
Potentiation rather than distraction in a trace fear conditioning procedure
title Potentiation rather than distraction in a trace fear conditioning procedure
title_full Potentiation rather than distraction in a trace fear conditioning procedure
title_fullStr Potentiation rather than distraction in a trace fear conditioning procedure
title_full_unstemmed Potentiation rather than distraction in a trace fear conditioning procedure
title_short Potentiation rather than distraction in a trace fear conditioning procedure
title_sort potentiation rather than distraction in a trace fear conditioning procedure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27060226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.04.003
work_keys_str_mv AT pezzema potentiationratherthandistractioninatracefearconditioningprocedure
AT marshallhj potentiationratherthandistractioninatracefearconditioningprocedure
AT cassadayhj potentiationratherthandistractioninatracefearconditioningprocedure