Cargando…
Volumetric (3D) bladder dose parameters are more reproducible than point (2D) dose parameters in vaginal vault high-dose-rate brachytherapy
There is no consensus on the use of computed tomography in vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB) planning. The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the reproducibility of point bladder dose parameters (D(ICRU) and maximum dose), compared with volumetric-based parameters. Twenty-two patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28074 |
_version_ | 1782437410482683904 |
---|---|
author | Sapienza, Lucas Gomes Flosi, Adriana Aiza, Antonio de Assis Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio Chojniak, Rubens Baiocchi, Glauco |
author_facet | Sapienza, Lucas Gomes Flosi, Adriana Aiza, Antonio de Assis Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio Chojniak, Rubens Baiocchi, Glauco |
author_sort | Sapienza, Lucas Gomes |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is no consensus on the use of computed tomography in vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB) planning. The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the reproducibility of point bladder dose parameters (D(ICRU) and maximum dose), compared with volumetric-based parameters. Twenty-two patients who were treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) VCB underwent simulation by computed tomography (CT-scan) with a Foley catheter at standard tension (position A) and extra tension (position B). CT-scan determined the bladder ICRU dose point in both positions and compared the displacement and recorded dose. Volumetric parameters (D0.1cc, D1.0cc, D2.0cc, D4.0cc and D50%) and point dose parameters were compared. The average spatial shift in ICRU dose point in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions was 2.91 mm (range: 0.10–9.00), 12.04 mm (range: 4.50–24.50) and 2.65 mm (range: 0.60–8.80), respectively. The D(ICRU) ratio for positions A and B was 1.64 (p < 0.001). Moreover, a decrease in Dmax was observed (p = 0.016). Tension level of the urinary catheter did not affect the volumetric parameters. Our data suggest that point parameters (D(ICRU) and Dmax) are not reproducible and are not the ideal choice for dose reporting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4906382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49063822016-06-15 Volumetric (3D) bladder dose parameters are more reproducible than point (2D) dose parameters in vaginal vault high-dose-rate brachytherapy Sapienza, Lucas Gomes Flosi, Adriana Aiza, Antonio de Assis Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio Chojniak, Rubens Baiocchi, Glauco Sci Rep Article There is no consensus on the use of computed tomography in vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB) planning. The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the reproducibility of point bladder dose parameters (D(ICRU) and maximum dose), compared with volumetric-based parameters. Twenty-two patients who were treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) VCB underwent simulation by computed tomography (CT-scan) with a Foley catheter at standard tension (position A) and extra tension (position B). CT-scan determined the bladder ICRU dose point in both positions and compared the displacement and recorded dose. Volumetric parameters (D0.1cc, D1.0cc, D2.0cc, D4.0cc and D50%) and point dose parameters were compared. The average spatial shift in ICRU dose point in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions was 2.91 mm (range: 0.10–9.00), 12.04 mm (range: 4.50–24.50) and 2.65 mm (range: 0.60–8.80), respectively. The D(ICRU) ratio for positions A and B was 1.64 (p < 0.001). Moreover, a decrease in Dmax was observed (p = 0.016). Tension level of the urinary catheter did not affect the volumetric parameters. Our data suggest that point parameters (D(ICRU) and Dmax) are not reproducible and are not the ideal choice for dose reporting. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4906382/ /pubmed/27296459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28074 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Sapienza, Lucas Gomes Flosi, Adriana Aiza, Antonio de Assis Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio Chojniak, Rubens Baiocchi, Glauco Volumetric (3D) bladder dose parameters are more reproducible than point (2D) dose parameters in vaginal vault high-dose-rate brachytherapy |
title | Volumetric (3D) bladder dose parameters are more reproducible than point (2D) dose parameters in vaginal vault high-dose-rate brachytherapy |
title_full | Volumetric (3D) bladder dose parameters are more reproducible than point (2D) dose parameters in vaginal vault high-dose-rate brachytherapy |
title_fullStr | Volumetric (3D) bladder dose parameters are more reproducible than point (2D) dose parameters in vaginal vault high-dose-rate brachytherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Volumetric (3D) bladder dose parameters are more reproducible than point (2D) dose parameters in vaginal vault high-dose-rate brachytherapy |
title_short | Volumetric (3D) bladder dose parameters are more reproducible than point (2D) dose parameters in vaginal vault high-dose-rate brachytherapy |
title_sort | volumetric (3d) bladder dose parameters are more reproducible than point (2d) dose parameters in vaginal vault high-dose-rate brachytherapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sapienzalucasgomes volumetric3dbladderdoseparametersaremorereproduciblethanpoint2ddoseparametersinvaginalvaulthighdoseratebrachytherapy AT flosiadriana volumetric3dbladderdoseparametersaremorereproduciblethanpoint2ddoseparametersinvaginalvaulthighdoseratebrachytherapy AT aizaantonio volumetric3dbladderdoseparametersaremorereproduciblethanpoint2ddoseparametersinvaginalvaulthighdoseratebrachytherapy AT deassispellizzonantoniocassio volumetric3dbladderdoseparametersaremorereproduciblethanpoint2ddoseparametersinvaginalvaulthighdoseratebrachytherapy AT chojniakrubens volumetric3dbladderdoseparametersaremorereproduciblethanpoint2ddoseparametersinvaginalvaulthighdoseratebrachytherapy AT baiocchiglauco volumetric3dbladderdoseparametersaremorereproduciblethanpoint2ddoseparametersinvaginalvaulthighdoseratebrachytherapy |