Cargando…

Evaluation of fliC-d based direct blood PCR assays for typhoid diagnosis

BACKGROUND: Typhoid cases need to be diagnosed accurately for early antibiotic therapy and reducing mortality. Identification of Salmonella Typhi (S. Typhi) in blood culture is conclusive, but has poor sensitivity. Detection of S. Typhi by PCR from blood sample has shown promise. Real-time quantitat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Surojit, Ray, Ujjwayini, Akhter, Irfaan, Chattopadhyay, Arka, Paul, Dilip Kumar, Dutta, Shanta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0723-6
_version_ 1782437453161824256
author Das, Surojit
Ray, Ujjwayini
Akhter, Irfaan
Chattopadhyay, Arka
Paul, Dilip Kumar
Dutta, Shanta
author_facet Das, Surojit
Ray, Ujjwayini
Akhter, Irfaan
Chattopadhyay, Arka
Paul, Dilip Kumar
Dutta, Shanta
author_sort Das, Surojit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Typhoid cases need to be diagnosed accurately for early antibiotic therapy and reducing mortality. Identification of Salmonella Typhi (S. Typhi) in blood culture is conclusive, but has poor sensitivity. Detection of S. Typhi by PCR from blood sample has shown promise. Real-time quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) has been widely used in diagnostics for its rapidity and reliability. In the present study, the performance of molecular methods like conventional PCR (C-PCR), nested PCR (N-PCR) and Q-PCR were investigated and compared by targeting S. Typhi specific flagellar fliC-d gene directly in blood samples for typhoid diagnosis. RESULTS: Analytical sensitivities and specificities of the PCR assays were determined under laboratory condition followed by diagnostic performances were demonstrated in 110 clinically diagnosed typhoid fever (CDTF) cases included as study subjects. The DNA detection limit of C-PCR was observed 3 × 10(4) copies/reaction; those of N-PCR and Q-PCR (cutoff Ct value, ≤37) were 3 copies/reaction. The C-PCR was not further evaluated since it showed negative results with all clinical samples due to low sensitivity. Low isolation rate (21.8 %, 24/110) of S. Typhi by blood culture did not reflect the true burden of typhoid fever among the study subjects. Hence diagnostic performances of N-PCR and Q-PCR were determined considering CDTF cases positive by any of the diagnostic assay methods (n = 81) as true positives. Laboratory confirmed non-typhoidal cases (n = 29) were included as true negatives. On comparison, although both the assays were 100 % specific; sensitivity (91.4 % vs. 81.5 %) and efficiency (93.6 % vs. 86.4 %) of Q-PCR were better, but statistically not significant (p > 0.1) than N-PCR. The positive and negative likelihood ratios of Q-PCR were ∞ and 0.09 which indicated the potential clinical utility of Q-PCR for typhoid diagnosis. Q-PCR was more rapid than N-PCR (2 h vs. 6 h) in obtaining test results. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that TaqMan-based Q-PCR assay performs more favorably than N-PCR for direct detection of S. Typhi DNA in blood samples. Direct and quantitative blood Q-PCR is a rapid and reliable method for diagnosis of typhoid fever.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4906692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49066922016-06-15 Evaluation of fliC-d based direct blood PCR assays for typhoid diagnosis Das, Surojit Ray, Ujjwayini Akhter, Irfaan Chattopadhyay, Arka Paul, Dilip Kumar Dutta, Shanta BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Typhoid cases need to be diagnosed accurately for early antibiotic therapy and reducing mortality. Identification of Salmonella Typhi (S. Typhi) in blood culture is conclusive, but has poor sensitivity. Detection of S. Typhi by PCR from blood sample has shown promise. Real-time quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) has been widely used in diagnostics for its rapidity and reliability. In the present study, the performance of molecular methods like conventional PCR (C-PCR), nested PCR (N-PCR) and Q-PCR were investigated and compared by targeting S. Typhi specific flagellar fliC-d gene directly in blood samples for typhoid diagnosis. RESULTS: Analytical sensitivities and specificities of the PCR assays were determined under laboratory condition followed by diagnostic performances were demonstrated in 110 clinically diagnosed typhoid fever (CDTF) cases included as study subjects. The DNA detection limit of C-PCR was observed 3 × 10(4) copies/reaction; those of N-PCR and Q-PCR (cutoff Ct value, ≤37) were 3 copies/reaction. The C-PCR was not further evaluated since it showed negative results with all clinical samples due to low sensitivity. Low isolation rate (21.8 %, 24/110) of S. Typhi by blood culture did not reflect the true burden of typhoid fever among the study subjects. Hence diagnostic performances of N-PCR and Q-PCR were determined considering CDTF cases positive by any of the diagnostic assay methods (n = 81) as true positives. Laboratory confirmed non-typhoidal cases (n = 29) were included as true negatives. On comparison, although both the assays were 100 % specific; sensitivity (91.4 % vs. 81.5 %) and efficiency (93.6 % vs. 86.4 %) of Q-PCR were better, but statistically not significant (p > 0.1) than N-PCR. The positive and negative likelihood ratios of Q-PCR were ∞ and 0.09 which indicated the potential clinical utility of Q-PCR for typhoid diagnosis. Q-PCR was more rapid than N-PCR (2 h vs. 6 h) in obtaining test results. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that TaqMan-based Q-PCR assay performs more favorably than N-PCR for direct detection of S. Typhi DNA in blood samples. Direct and quantitative blood Q-PCR is a rapid and reliable method for diagnosis of typhoid fever. BioMed Central 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4906692/ /pubmed/27296619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0723-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Das, Surojit
Ray, Ujjwayini
Akhter, Irfaan
Chattopadhyay, Arka
Paul, Dilip Kumar
Dutta, Shanta
Evaluation of fliC-d based direct blood PCR assays for typhoid diagnosis
title Evaluation of fliC-d based direct blood PCR assays for typhoid diagnosis
title_full Evaluation of fliC-d based direct blood PCR assays for typhoid diagnosis
title_fullStr Evaluation of fliC-d based direct blood PCR assays for typhoid diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of fliC-d based direct blood PCR assays for typhoid diagnosis
title_short Evaluation of fliC-d based direct blood PCR assays for typhoid diagnosis
title_sort evaluation of flic-d based direct blood pcr assays for typhoid diagnosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0723-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dassurojit evaluationofflicdbaseddirectbloodpcrassaysfortyphoiddiagnosis
AT rayujjwayini evaluationofflicdbaseddirectbloodpcrassaysfortyphoiddiagnosis
AT akhterirfaan evaluationofflicdbaseddirectbloodpcrassaysfortyphoiddiagnosis
AT chattopadhyayarka evaluationofflicdbaseddirectbloodpcrassaysfortyphoiddiagnosis
AT pauldilipkumar evaluationofflicdbaseddirectbloodpcrassaysfortyphoiddiagnosis
AT duttashanta evaluationofflicdbaseddirectbloodpcrassaysfortyphoiddiagnosis