Cargando…

Reduced long-term memory in a rat model of 8 minutes ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest: a pilot trial

BACKGROUND: Evaluating beneficial effects of potential protective therapies following cardiac arrest in rodent models could be enhanced by exploring behavior and cognitive functions. The Morris Water Maze is a well-known cognitive paradigm to test spatial learning and memory. RESULTS: Behavioral tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weihs, Wolfgang, Warenits, Alexandra-M, Ettl, Florian, Magnet, Ingrid A. M., Teubenbacher, Ursula, Hilpold, Andreas, Schober, Andreas, Testori, Christoph, Tiboldi, Akos, Mag, Katharina Tillmann, Holzer, Michael, Hoegler, Sandra, Janata, Andreas, Sterz, Fritz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0740-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Evaluating beneficial effects of potential protective therapies following cardiac arrest in rodent models could be enhanced by exploring behavior and cognitive functions. The Morris Water Maze is a well-known cognitive paradigm to test spatial learning and memory. RESULTS: Behavioral testing with the Morris Water Maze in Sprague–Dawley rats (300 ± 25 g) resuscitated after 8 min of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest was carried out 5 and 12 weeks after cardiac arrest (CA) and compared to results of naïve rats (Control). At 5 weeks, within each group latency time to reach the hidden platform (reflecting spatial learning) decreased equally from day 1 to 4 (CA: 105.6 ± 8.2 vs. 8.9 ± 1.2 s, p < 0.001; Control: 75.5 ± 13.2 vs. 17.1 ± 4.5, p < 0.001) with no differences between groups (p = 0.138). In the probe trial 24 h after the last trial, time spent in the target sector (reflecting memory recall) within each group was significantly longer (CA: 25 ± 1.3; Control: 24.7 ± 2.5 s) than in each of the three other sectors (CA: 7.7 ± 0.7, 14.3 ± 2.5, 8.4 ± 0.8 and Control: 7.8 ± 1.2, 11.7 ± 1.5, 10.3 ± 1.6 s) but with no significantly differences between groups. Seven days later (reflecting memory retention), control group animals remained significantly longer in the target sector compared to every other sector, whereas the cardiac arrest group animals did not. Even 12 weeks after cardiac arrest, the single p values showed that the control animals displayed a trend to perform better than the resuscitated animals. CONCLUSIONS: Memory recall was impaired early after 8 min of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest and might be a more valuable tool for cognitive testing than learning recall after global ischemia due to cardiac arrest.