Cargando…

Immunization of Cattle with Tick Salivary Gland Extracts

BACKGROUND: Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus tick is one of the most important ectoparasite of cattle. Recently, several laboratories in the world have been concentrated on immunizing cattle against tick using various types of tissue extracts of ticks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikpay, Ali, Nabian, Sedigheh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27308287
_version_ 1782437461341765632
author Nikpay, Ali
Nabian, Sedigheh
author_facet Nikpay, Ali
Nabian, Sedigheh
author_sort Nikpay, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus tick is one of the most important ectoparasite of cattle. Recently, several laboratories in the world have been concentrated on immunizing cattle against tick using various types of tissue extracts of ticks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of immunization of cattle with tick salivary gland extract on biological parameters of ticks and humoral immune responses of cattle. METHODS: Fourteen more dominant protein bands identified as immunogenic by Western-blot analysis were eluted from polyacrylamide gel. Test and control groups were injected three times with eluted proteins and sterile PBS (pH= 7.2) respectively with equivalent amount of adjuvant. After four weeks a tick challenge was performed. Finally, biological parameters of collected engorged female ticks were recorded and humoral immune responses to immunization measured by ELISA. RESULTS: The results indicated immunization of cattle resulted in reduction in mean tick counts, attachment, engorgement weights, feeding index, egg mass weight, hatchability and fertility index (respectively 63.1%, 62.6%, 30.2%, 36.4%, 40%, 78.7% and 13.3%) and increased duration of feeding, preoviposition and incubation period of eggs (respectively 8.6%, 45 and 31.34%). All changes were statistically significant (P< 0.05). Results showed an increase in antibody production of test group from the first week after immunization. The antibody level was boosted following tick infestation. CONCLUSION: This investigation indicates that immunization of cattle with these antigens could induce a protective immune response against Rh. (B.) annulatus tick that would be expected to provide a safe non-chemical means of tick control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4906735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49067352016-06-15 Immunization of Cattle with Tick Salivary Gland Extracts Nikpay, Ali Nabian, Sedigheh J Arthropod Borne Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus tick is one of the most important ectoparasite of cattle. Recently, several laboratories in the world have been concentrated on immunizing cattle against tick using various types of tissue extracts of ticks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of immunization of cattle with tick salivary gland extract on biological parameters of ticks and humoral immune responses of cattle. METHODS: Fourteen more dominant protein bands identified as immunogenic by Western-blot analysis were eluted from polyacrylamide gel. Test and control groups were injected three times with eluted proteins and sterile PBS (pH= 7.2) respectively with equivalent amount of adjuvant. After four weeks a tick challenge was performed. Finally, biological parameters of collected engorged female ticks were recorded and humoral immune responses to immunization measured by ELISA. RESULTS: The results indicated immunization of cattle resulted in reduction in mean tick counts, attachment, engorgement weights, feeding index, egg mass weight, hatchability and fertility index (respectively 63.1%, 62.6%, 30.2%, 36.4%, 40%, 78.7% and 13.3%) and increased duration of feeding, preoviposition and incubation period of eggs (respectively 8.6%, 45 and 31.34%). All changes were statistically significant (P< 0.05). Results showed an increase in antibody production of test group from the first week after immunization. The antibody level was boosted following tick infestation. CONCLUSION: This investigation indicates that immunization of cattle with these antigens could induce a protective immune response against Rh. (B.) annulatus tick that would be expected to provide a safe non-chemical means of tick control. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4906735/ /pubmed/27308287 Text en Copyright© Iranian Society of Medical Entomology & Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nikpay, Ali
Nabian, Sedigheh
Immunization of Cattle with Tick Salivary Gland Extracts
title Immunization of Cattle with Tick Salivary Gland Extracts
title_full Immunization of Cattle with Tick Salivary Gland Extracts
title_fullStr Immunization of Cattle with Tick Salivary Gland Extracts
title_full_unstemmed Immunization of Cattle with Tick Salivary Gland Extracts
title_short Immunization of Cattle with Tick Salivary Gland Extracts
title_sort immunization of cattle with tick salivary gland extracts
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27308287
work_keys_str_mv AT nikpayali immunizationofcattlewithticksalivaryglandextracts
AT nabiansedigheh immunizationofcattlewithticksalivaryglandextracts