Cargando…
Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Information on reporting completeness of passive surveillance systems can improve the quality of and public health response to surveillance data and better inform public health planning. As a result, we systematically reviewed available literature on reporting completeness of hepatitis A...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27297559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1636-6 |
_version_ | 1782437486208745472 |
---|---|
author | Savage, Rachel D. Rosella, Laura C. Brown, Kevin A. Khan, Kamran Crowcroft, Natasha S. |
author_facet | Savage, Rachel D. Rosella, Laura C. Brown, Kevin A. Khan, Kamran Crowcroft, Natasha S. |
author_sort | Savage, Rachel D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Information on reporting completeness of passive surveillance systems can improve the quality of and public health response to surveillance data and better inform public health planning. As a result, we systematically reviewed available literature on reporting completeness of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE and grey literature sources, restricting to studies published in English between 1997 and 21 May 2015. Primary studies on hepatitis A surveillance and underreporting in non-endemic countries were included, and assessed for risk of bias. A pooled proportion of reporting completeness was estimated using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. RESULTS: Diagnosed hepatitis A cases identified through positive laboratory tests, physician visits, and inpatient hospital discharges were underreported to public health in all eight included studies. Reporting completeness ranged from 4 to 97 % (pooled proportion 59 %, 95 % confidence interval = 32 %, 84 %). Substantial heterogeneity was observed, which may be explained by differences in the referent data sources used to identify diagnosed cases and in case reporting mechanisms and/or staffing infrastructure. Completeness was improved in settings where case reporting was automated or where dedicated staff had clear reporting responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies that evaluate reporting completeness should describe the context, components, and operations of the surveillance system being evaluated in order to identify modifiable characteristics that improve system sensitivity and utility. Additionally, reporting completeness should be assessed across high risk groups to inform equitable allocation of public health resources and evaluate the effectiveness of targeted interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1636-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4906888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49068882016-06-15 Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis Savage, Rachel D. Rosella, Laura C. Brown, Kevin A. Khan, Kamran Crowcroft, Natasha S. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Information on reporting completeness of passive surveillance systems can improve the quality of and public health response to surveillance data and better inform public health planning. As a result, we systematically reviewed available literature on reporting completeness of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE and grey literature sources, restricting to studies published in English between 1997 and 21 May 2015. Primary studies on hepatitis A surveillance and underreporting in non-endemic countries were included, and assessed for risk of bias. A pooled proportion of reporting completeness was estimated using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. RESULTS: Diagnosed hepatitis A cases identified through positive laboratory tests, physician visits, and inpatient hospital discharges were underreported to public health in all eight included studies. Reporting completeness ranged from 4 to 97 % (pooled proportion 59 %, 95 % confidence interval = 32 %, 84 %). Substantial heterogeneity was observed, which may be explained by differences in the referent data sources used to identify diagnosed cases and in case reporting mechanisms and/or staffing infrastructure. Completeness was improved in settings where case reporting was automated or where dedicated staff had clear reporting responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies that evaluate reporting completeness should describe the context, components, and operations of the surveillance system being evaluated in order to identify modifiable characteristics that improve system sensitivity and utility. Additionally, reporting completeness should be assessed across high risk groups to inform equitable allocation of public health resources and evaluate the effectiveness of targeted interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1636-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4906888/ /pubmed/27297559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1636-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Savage, Rachel D. Rosella, Laura C. Brown, Kevin A. Khan, Kamran Crowcroft, Natasha S. Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | underreporting of hepatitis a in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27297559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1636-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT savageracheld underreportingofhepatitisainnonendemiccountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rosellalaurac underreportingofhepatitisainnonendemiccountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT brownkevina underreportingofhepatitisainnonendemiccountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT khankamran underreportingofhepatitisainnonendemiccountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT crowcroftnatashas underreportingofhepatitisainnonendemiccountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |