Cargando…

Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Information on reporting completeness of passive surveillance systems can improve the quality of and public health response to surveillance data and better inform public health planning. As a result, we systematically reviewed available literature on reporting completeness of hepatitis A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savage, Rachel D., Rosella, Laura C., Brown, Kevin A., Khan, Kamran, Crowcroft, Natasha S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27297559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1636-6
_version_ 1782437486208745472
author Savage, Rachel D.
Rosella, Laura C.
Brown, Kevin A.
Khan, Kamran
Crowcroft, Natasha S.
author_facet Savage, Rachel D.
Rosella, Laura C.
Brown, Kevin A.
Khan, Kamran
Crowcroft, Natasha S.
author_sort Savage, Rachel D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Information on reporting completeness of passive surveillance systems can improve the quality of and public health response to surveillance data and better inform public health planning. As a result, we systematically reviewed available literature on reporting completeness of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE and grey literature sources, restricting to studies published in English between 1997 and 21 May 2015. Primary studies on hepatitis A surveillance and underreporting in non-endemic countries were included, and assessed for risk of bias. A pooled proportion of reporting completeness was estimated using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. RESULTS: Diagnosed hepatitis A cases identified through positive laboratory tests, physician visits, and inpatient hospital discharges were underreported to public health in all eight included studies. Reporting completeness ranged from 4 to 97 % (pooled proportion 59 %, 95 % confidence interval = 32 %, 84 %). Substantial heterogeneity was observed, which may be explained by differences in the referent data sources used to identify diagnosed cases and in case reporting mechanisms and/or staffing infrastructure. Completeness was improved in settings where case reporting was automated or where dedicated staff had clear reporting responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies that evaluate reporting completeness should describe the context, components, and operations of the surveillance system being evaluated in order to identify modifiable characteristics that improve system sensitivity and utility. Additionally, reporting completeness should be assessed across high risk groups to inform equitable allocation of public health resources and evaluate the effectiveness of targeted interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1636-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4906888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49068882016-06-15 Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis Savage, Rachel D. Rosella, Laura C. Brown, Kevin A. Khan, Kamran Crowcroft, Natasha S. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Information on reporting completeness of passive surveillance systems can improve the quality of and public health response to surveillance data and better inform public health planning. As a result, we systematically reviewed available literature on reporting completeness of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE and grey literature sources, restricting to studies published in English between 1997 and 21 May 2015. Primary studies on hepatitis A surveillance and underreporting in non-endemic countries were included, and assessed for risk of bias. A pooled proportion of reporting completeness was estimated using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. RESULTS: Diagnosed hepatitis A cases identified through positive laboratory tests, physician visits, and inpatient hospital discharges were underreported to public health in all eight included studies. Reporting completeness ranged from 4 to 97 % (pooled proportion 59 %, 95 % confidence interval = 32 %, 84 %). Substantial heterogeneity was observed, which may be explained by differences in the referent data sources used to identify diagnosed cases and in case reporting mechanisms and/or staffing infrastructure. Completeness was improved in settings where case reporting was automated or where dedicated staff had clear reporting responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies that evaluate reporting completeness should describe the context, components, and operations of the surveillance system being evaluated in order to identify modifiable characteristics that improve system sensitivity and utility. Additionally, reporting completeness should be assessed across high risk groups to inform equitable allocation of public health resources and evaluate the effectiveness of targeted interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1636-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4906888/ /pubmed/27297559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1636-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Savage, Rachel D.
Rosella, Laura C.
Brown, Kevin A.
Khan, Kamran
Crowcroft, Natasha S.
Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Underreporting of hepatitis A in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort underreporting of hepatitis a in non-endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4906888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27297559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1636-6
work_keys_str_mv AT savageracheld underreportingofhepatitisainnonendemiccountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rosellalaurac underreportingofhepatitisainnonendemiccountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brownkevina underreportingofhepatitisainnonendemiccountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khankamran underreportingofhepatitisainnonendemiccountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT crowcroftnatashas underreportingofhepatitisainnonendemiccountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis