Cargando…
Sutureless Adult Voluntary Male Circumcision with Topical Anesthetic: A Randomized Field Trial of Unicirc, a Single-Use Surgical Instrument
INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization has solicited rapid and minimally invasive techniques to facilitate scale-up of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC). STUDY DESIGN: Non-blinded randomized controlled field trial with 2:1 allocation ratio. PARTICIPANTS: 75 adult male volunteers. SETTI...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27299735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157065 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization has solicited rapid and minimally invasive techniques to facilitate scale-up of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC). STUDY DESIGN: Non-blinded randomized controlled field trial with 2:1 allocation ratio. PARTICIPANTS: 75 adult male volunteers. SETTING: Outpatient primary care clinic. INTERVENTION: Open surgical circumcision under local anesthetic with suturing vs. Unicirc disposable instrument under topical anesthetic and wound sealing with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Intraoperative duration. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Intraoperative and postoperative pain; adverse events; time to healing; patient satisfaction; cosmetic result. RESULTS: The intraoperative time was less with the Unicirc technique (median 12 vs. 25 min, p < 0.001). Wound healing and cosmetic results were superior in the Unicirc group. Adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: VMMC with Unicirc under topical anesthetic and wound sealing with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive is rapid, heals by primary intention with superior cosmetic results, and is potentially safer and more cost-effective than open surgical VMMC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02443792 |
---|