Cargando…

An Evaluation of Matrix-Containing and Humanised Matrix-Free 3-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems for Studying Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND: 3D cell cultures are emerging as more physiologically meaningful alternatives to monolayer cultures for many biological applications. They are attractive because they more closely mimic in vivo morphology, especially when co-cultured with stromal fibroblasts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDIN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Grace C., Morris, Paul G., Moss, Marcus A., Maltby, Sarah L., Palmer, Chelsea A., Nash, Claire E., Smart, Emily, Holliday, Deborah L., Speirs, Valerie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27300768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157004
_version_ 1782437543837433856
author Roberts, Grace C.
Morris, Paul G.
Moss, Marcus A.
Maltby, Sarah L.
Palmer, Chelsea A.
Nash, Claire E.
Smart, Emily
Holliday, Deborah L.
Speirs, Valerie
author_facet Roberts, Grace C.
Morris, Paul G.
Moss, Marcus A.
Maltby, Sarah L.
Palmer, Chelsea A.
Nash, Claire E.
Smart, Emily
Holliday, Deborah L.
Speirs, Valerie
author_sort Roberts, Grace C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 3D cell cultures are emerging as more physiologically meaningful alternatives to monolayer cultures for many biological applications. They are attractive because they more closely mimic in vivo morphology, especially when co-cultured with stromal fibroblasts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compared the efficacy of 3 different 3D cell culture systems; collagen I, low attachment culture vessels and a modification of Fibrolife®, a specialised humanised cell culture medium devoid of animal-derived components, using breast cancer cell lines representative of the different molecular subtypes of breast cancer, cultured alone or with human mammary fibroblasts with a view to developing matrix-free humanised systems. 3D collagen I culture supported the growth of a range of breast cancer cell lines. By modifying the composition of Fibrolife® to epiFL, matrix-free cell culture was possible. During sequential transfer to epiFL breast cancer cells gradually detached from the flask, growing progressively as spheroids. Phenotype was stable and reversible with cells remaining actively proliferating and easily accessible throughout culture. They could also be revived from frozen stocks. To achieve co-culture with fibroblasts in epiFL required use of low attachment culture vessels instead of standard plastic as fibroblasts remained adherent in epiFL. Here, cancer cell spheroids were allowed to form before adding fibroblasts. Immunohistochemical examination showed fibroblasts scattered throughout the epithelial spheroid, not dissimilar to the relationship of tumour stroma in human breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Because of its ease of handling, matrix-free 3D cell culture may be a useful model to study the influence of fibroblasts on breast cancer epithelial cells with use of epiFL culture medium taking this a step further towards a fully humanised 3D model. This methodology could be applied to other types of cancer cell lines, making this a versatile technique for cancer researchers wishing to use in vitro systems that better reflect cancer in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4907459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49074592016-07-18 An Evaluation of Matrix-Containing and Humanised Matrix-Free 3-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems for Studying Breast Cancer Roberts, Grace C. Morris, Paul G. Moss, Marcus A. Maltby, Sarah L. Palmer, Chelsea A. Nash, Claire E. Smart, Emily Holliday, Deborah L. Speirs, Valerie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: 3D cell cultures are emerging as more physiologically meaningful alternatives to monolayer cultures for many biological applications. They are attractive because they more closely mimic in vivo morphology, especially when co-cultured with stromal fibroblasts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compared the efficacy of 3 different 3D cell culture systems; collagen I, low attachment culture vessels and a modification of Fibrolife®, a specialised humanised cell culture medium devoid of animal-derived components, using breast cancer cell lines representative of the different molecular subtypes of breast cancer, cultured alone or with human mammary fibroblasts with a view to developing matrix-free humanised systems. 3D collagen I culture supported the growth of a range of breast cancer cell lines. By modifying the composition of Fibrolife® to epiFL, matrix-free cell culture was possible. During sequential transfer to epiFL breast cancer cells gradually detached from the flask, growing progressively as spheroids. Phenotype was stable and reversible with cells remaining actively proliferating and easily accessible throughout culture. They could also be revived from frozen stocks. To achieve co-culture with fibroblasts in epiFL required use of low attachment culture vessels instead of standard plastic as fibroblasts remained adherent in epiFL. Here, cancer cell spheroids were allowed to form before adding fibroblasts. Immunohistochemical examination showed fibroblasts scattered throughout the epithelial spheroid, not dissimilar to the relationship of tumour stroma in human breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Because of its ease of handling, matrix-free 3D cell culture may be a useful model to study the influence of fibroblasts on breast cancer epithelial cells with use of epiFL culture medium taking this a step further towards a fully humanised 3D model. This methodology could be applied to other types of cancer cell lines, making this a versatile technique for cancer researchers wishing to use in vitro systems that better reflect cancer in vivo. Public Library of Science 2016-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4907459/ /pubmed/27300768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157004 Text en © 2016 Roberts et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roberts, Grace C.
Morris, Paul G.
Moss, Marcus A.
Maltby, Sarah L.
Palmer, Chelsea A.
Nash, Claire E.
Smart, Emily
Holliday, Deborah L.
Speirs, Valerie
An Evaluation of Matrix-Containing and Humanised Matrix-Free 3-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems for Studying Breast Cancer
title An Evaluation of Matrix-Containing and Humanised Matrix-Free 3-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems for Studying Breast Cancer
title_full An Evaluation of Matrix-Containing and Humanised Matrix-Free 3-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems for Studying Breast Cancer
title_fullStr An Evaluation of Matrix-Containing and Humanised Matrix-Free 3-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems for Studying Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of Matrix-Containing and Humanised Matrix-Free 3-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems for Studying Breast Cancer
title_short An Evaluation of Matrix-Containing and Humanised Matrix-Free 3-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems for Studying Breast Cancer
title_sort evaluation of matrix-containing and humanised matrix-free 3-dimensional cell culture systems for studying breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27300768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157004
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsgracec anevaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT morrispaulg anevaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT mossmarcusa anevaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT maltbysarahl anevaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT palmerchelseaa anevaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT nashclairee anevaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT smartemily anevaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT hollidaydeborahl anevaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT speirsvalerie anevaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT robertsgracec evaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT morrispaulg evaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT mossmarcusa evaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT maltbysarahl evaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT palmerchelseaa evaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT nashclairee evaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT smartemily evaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT hollidaydeborahl evaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer
AT speirsvalerie evaluationofmatrixcontainingandhumanisedmatrixfree3dimensionalcellculturesystemsforstudyingbreastcancer