Cargando…
Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases
BACKGROUND: As Barthel Index (BI) quantifies motor impairment but not breathlessness, the use of only this index could underestimate disability in chronic respiratory disease (CRD). To our knowledge, no study evaluates both motor and respiratory disability in CRD during activities of daily living (A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27354778 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S104376 |
_version_ | 1782437549044662272 |
---|---|
author | Vitacca, Michele Paneroni, Mara Baiardi, Paola De Carolis, Vito Zampogna, Elisabetta Belli, Stefano Carone, Mauro Spanevello, Antonio Balbi, Bruno Bertolotti, Giorgio |
author_facet | Vitacca, Michele Paneroni, Mara Baiardi, Paola De Carolis, Vito Zampogna, Elisabetta Belli, Stefano Carone, Mauro Spanevello, Antonio Balbi, Bruno Bertolotti, Giorgio |
author_sort | Vitacca, Michele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As Barthel Index (BI) quantifies motor impairment but not breathlessness, the use of only this index could underestimate disability in chronic respiratory disease (CRD). To our knowledge, no study evaluates both motor and respiratory disability in CRD during activities of daily living (ADLs) simultaneously and with a unique tool. The objective of this study was to propose for patients with CRD an additional tool for dyspnea assessment during ADLs based on BI items named Barthel Index dyspnea. METHODS: Comprehensibility, reliability, internal consistency, validity, responsiveness, and ability to differentiate between disease groups were assessed on 219 subjects through an observational study performed in an in-hospital rehabilitation setting. RESULTS: Good comprehensibility, high reliability (interrater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93 [95% confidence interval 0.892–0.964] and test–retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 [95% confidence interval 0.983–0.994]), good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.89), strong concurrent validity with 6 minute walking distance (Pearson r=−0.538, P<0.001) and Medical Research Council (Spearman r(S)=0.70, P<0.001), good responsiveness after rehabilitation (P<0.001), and good appropriateness of the index were found evidencing patients with different dyspnea severity. Divergent validity showed weak correlation (Pearson r=−0.38) comparing Barthel Index dyspnea and BI. CONCLUSION: The BI based on dyspnea perception proved to be reliable, sensitive, and adequate as a tool for measuring the level of dyspnea perceived in performing basic daily living activities. A unique instrument simultaneously administered may provide a global assessment of disability during ADLs incorporating both motor and respiratory aspects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4907483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49074832016-06-28 Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases Vitacca, Michele Paneroni, Mara Baiardi, Paola De Carolis, Vito Zampogna, Elisabetta Belli, Stefano Carone, Mauro Spanevello, Antonio Balbi, Bruno Bertolotti, Giorgio Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: As Barthel Index (BI) quantifies motor impairment but not breathlessness, the use of only this index could underestimate disability in chronic respiratory disease (CRD). To our knowledge, no study evaluates both motor and respiratory disability in CRD during activities of daily living (ADLs) simultaneously and with a unique tool. The objective of this study was to propose for patients with CRD an additional tool for dyspnea assessment during ADLs based on BI items named Barthel Index dyspnea. METHODS: Comprehensibility, reliability, internal consistency, validity, responsiveness, and ability to differentiate between disease groups were assessed on 219 subjects through an observational study performed in an in-hospital rehabilitation setting. RESULTS: Good comprehensibility, high reliability (interrater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93 [95% confidence interval 0.892–0.964] and test–retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 [95% confidence interval 0.983–0.994]), good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.89), strong concurrent validity with 6 minute walking distance (Pearson r=−0.538, P<0.001) and Medical Research Council (Spearman r(S)=0.70, P<0.001), good responsiveness after rehabilitation (P<0.001), and good appropriateness of the index were found evidencing patients with different dyspnea severity. Divergent validity showed weak correlation (Pearson r=−0.38) comparing Barthel Index dyspnea and BI. CONCLUSION: The BI based on dyspnea perception proved to be reliable, sensitive, and adequate as a tool for measuring the level of dyspnea perceived in performing basic daily living activities. A unique instrument simultaneously administered may provide a global assessment of disability during ADLs incorporating both motor and respiratory aspects. Dove Medical Press 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4907483/ /pubmed/27354778 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S104376 Text en © 2016 Vitacca et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Vitacca, Michele Paneroni, Mara Baiardi, Paola De Carolis, Vito Zampogna, Elisabetta Belli, Stefano Carone, Mauro Spanevello, Antonio Balbi, Bruno Bertolotti, Giorgio Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases |
title | Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases |
title_full | Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases |
title_fullStr | Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases |
title_short | Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases |
title_sort | development of a barthel index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27354778 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S104376 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vitaccamichele developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT paneronimara developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT baiardipaola developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT decarolisvito developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT zampognaelisabetta developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT bellistefano developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT caronemauro developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT spanevelloantonio developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT balbibruno developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT bertolottigiorgio developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases |