Cargando…

Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases

BACKGROUND: As Barthel Index (BI) quantifies motor impairment but not breathlessness, the use of only this index could underestimate disability in chronic respiratory disease (CRD). To our knowledge, no study evaluates both motor and respiratory disability in CRD during activities of daily living (A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vitacca, Michele, Paneroni, Mara, Baiardi, Paola, De Carolis, Vito, Zampogna, Elisabetta, Belli, Stefano, Carone, Mauro, Spanevello, Antonio, Balbi, Bruno, Bertolotti, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27354778
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S104376
_version_ 1782437549044662272
author Vitacca, Michele
Paneroni, Mara
Baiardi, Paola
De Carolis, Vito
Zampogna, Elisabetta
Belli, Stefano
Carone, Mauro
Spanevello, Antonio
Balbi, Bruno
Bertolotti, Giorgio
author_facet Vitacca, Michele
Paneroni, Mara
Baiardi, Paola
De Carolis, Vito
Zampogna, Elisabetta
Belli, Stefano
Carone, Mauro
Spanevello, Antonio
Balbi, Bruno
Bertolotti, Giorgio
author_sort Vitacca, Michele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As Barthel Index (BI) quantifies motor impairment but not breathlessness, the use of only this index could underestimate disability in chronic respiratory disease (CRD). To our knowledge, no study evaluates both motor and respiratory disability in CRD during activities of daily living (ADLs) simultaneously and with a unique tool. The objective of this study was to propose for patients with CRD an additional tool for dyspnea assessment during ADLs based on BI items named Barthel Index dyspnea. METHODS: Comprehensibility, reliability, internal consistency, validity, responsiveness, and ability to differentiate between disease groups were assessed on 219 subjects through an observational study performed in an in-hospital rehabilitation setting. RESULTS: Good comprehensibility, high reliability (interrater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93 [95% confidence interval 0.892–0.964] and test–retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 [95% confidence interval 0.983–0.994]), good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.89), strong concurrent validity with 6 minute walking distance (Pearson r=−0.538, P<0.001) and Medical Research Council (Spearman r(S)=0.70, P<0.001), good responsiveness after rehabilitation (P<0.001), and good appropriateness of the index were found evidencing patients with different dyspnea severity. Divergent validity showed weak correlation (Pearson r=−0.38) comparing Barthel Index dyspnea and BI. CONCLUSION: The BI based on dyspnea perception proved to be reliable, sensitive, and adequate as a tool for measuring the level of dyspnea perceived in performing basic daily living activities. A unique instrument simultaneously administered may provide a global assessment of disability during ADLs incorporating both motor and respiratory aspects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4907483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49074832016-06-28 Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases Vitacca, Michele Paneroni, Mara Baiardi, Paola De Carolis, Vito Zampogna, Elisabetta Belli, Stefano Carone, Mauro Spanevello, Antonio Balbi, Bruno Bertolotti, Giorgio Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: As Barthel Index (BI) quantifies motor impairment but not breathlessness, the use of only this index could underestimate disability in chronic respiratory disease (CRD). To our knowledge, no study evaluates both motor and respiratory disability in CRD during activities of daily living (ADLs) simultaneously and with a unique tool. The objective of this study was to propose for patients with CRD an additional tool for dyspnea assessment during ADLs based on BI items named Barthel Index dyspnea. METHODS: Comprehensibility, reliability, internal consistency, validity, responsiveness, and ability to differentiate between disease groups were assessed on 219 subjects through an observational study performed in an in-hospital rehabilitation setting. RESULTS: Good comprehensibility, high reliability (interrater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93 [95% confidence interval 0.892–0.964] and test–retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 [95% confidence interval 0.983–0.994]), good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.89), strong concurrent validity with 6 minute walking distance (Pearson r=−0.538, P<0.001) and Medical Research Council (Spearman r(S)=0.70, P<0.001), good responsiveness after rehabilitation (P<0.001), and good appropriateness of the index were found evidencing patients with different dyspnea severity. Divergent validity showed weak correlation (Pearson r=−0.38) comparing Barthel Index dyspnea and BI. CONCLUSION: The BI based on dyspnea perception proved to be reliable, sensitive, and adequate as a tool for measuring the level of dyspnea perceived in performing basic daily living activities. A unique instrument simultaneously administered may provide a global assessment of disability during ADLs incorporating both motor and respiratory aspects. Dove Medical Press 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4907483/ /pubmed/27354778 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S104376 Text en © 2016 Vitacca et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Vitacca, Michele
Paneroni, Mara
Baiardi, Paola
De Carolis, Vito
Zampogna, Elisabetta
Belli, Stefano
Carone, Mauro
Spanevello, Antonio
Balbi, Bruno
Bertolotti, Giorgio
Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases
title Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases
title_full Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases
title_fullStr Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases
title_short Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases
title_sort development of a barthel index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27354778
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S104376
work_keys_str_mv AT vitaccamichele developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT paneronimara developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT baiardipaola developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT decarolisvito developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT zampognaelisabetta developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT bellistefano developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT caronemauro developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT spanevelloantonio developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT balbibruno developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT bertolottigiorgio developmentofabarthelindexbasedondyspneaforpatientswithrespiratorydiseases