Cargando…

Different cell cycle modifications repress apoptosis at different steps independent of developmental signaling in Drosophila

Apoptotic cell death is important for the normal development of a variety of organisms. Apoptosis is also a response to DNA damage and an important barrier to oncogenesis. The apoptotic response to DNA damage is dampened in specific cell types during development. Developmental signaling pathways can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Suozhi, Calvi, Brian R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society for Cell Biology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27075174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-03-0139
_version_ 1782437586135941120
author Qi, Suozhi
Calvi, Brian R.
author_facet Qi, Suozhi
Calvi, Brian R.
author_sort Qi, Suozhi
collection PubMed
description Apoptotic cell death is important for the normal development of a variety of organisms. Apoptosis is also a response to DNA damage and an important barrier to oncogenesis. The apoptotic response to DNA damage is dampened in specific cell types during development. Developmental signaling pathways can repress apoptosis, and reduced cell proliferation also correlates with a lower apoptotic response. However, because developmental signaling regulates both cell proliferation and apoptosis, the relative contribution of cell division to the apoptotic response has been hard to discern in vivo. Here we use Drosophila oogenesis as an in vivo model system to determine the extent to which cell proliferation influences the apoptotic response to DNA damage. We find that different types of cell cycle modifications are sufficient to repress the apoptotic response to ionizing radiation independent of developmental signaling. The step(s) at which the apoptosis pathway was repressed depended on the type of cell cycle modification—either upstream or downstream of expression of the p53-regulated proapoptotic genes. Our findings have important implications for understanding the coordination of cell proliferation with the apoptotic response in development and disease, including cancer and the tissue-specific responses to radiation therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4907722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49077222016-08-30 Different cell cycle modifications repress apoptosis at different steps independent of developmental signaling in Drosophila Qi, Suozhi Calvi, Brian R. Mol Biol Cell Articles Apoptotic cell death is important for the normal development of a variety of organisms. Apoptosis is also a response to DNA damage and an important barrier to oncogenesis. The apoptotic response to DNA damage is dampened in specific cell types during development. Developmental signaling pathways can repress apoptosis, and reduced cell proliferation also correlates with a lower apoptotic response. However, because developmental signaling regulates both cell proliferation and apoptosis, the relative contribution of cell division to the apoptotic response has been hard to discern in vivo. Here we use Drosophila oogenesis as an in vivo model system to determine the extent to which cell proliferation influences the apoptotic response to DNA damage. We find that different types of cell cycle modifications are sufficient to repress the apoptotic response to ionizing radiation independent of developmental signaling. The step(s) at which the apoptosis pathway was repressed depended on the type of cell cycle modification—either upstream or downstream of expression of the p53-regulated proapoptotic genes. Our findings have important implications for understanding the coordination of cell proliferation with the apoptotic response in development and disease, including cancer and the tissue-specific responses to radiation therapy. The American Society for Cell Biology 2016-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4907722/ /pubmed/27075174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-03-0139 Text en © 2016 Qi and Calvi. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.
spellingShingle Articles
Qi, Suozhi
Calvi, Brian R.
Different cell cycle modifications repress apoptosis at different steps independent of developmental signaling in Drosophila
title Different cell cycle modifications repress apoptosis at different steps independent of developmental signaling in Drosophila
title_full Different cell cycle modifications repress apoptosis at different steps independent of developmental signaling in Drosophila
title_fullStr Different cell cycle modifications repress apoptosis at different steps independent of developmental signaling in Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Different cell cycle modifications repress apoptosis at different steps independent of developmental signaling in Drosophila
title_short Different cell cycle modifications repress apoptosis at different steps independent of developmental signaling in Drosophila
title_sort different cell cycle modifications repress apoptosis at different steps independent of developmental signaling in drosophila
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27075174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-03-0139
work_keys_str_mv AT qisuozhi differentcellcyclemodificationsrepressapoptosisatdifferentstepsindependentofdevelopmentalsignalingindrosophila
AT calvibrianr differentcellcyclemodificationsrepressapoptosisatdifferentstepsindependentofdevelopmentalsignalingindrosophila