Cargando…
A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy()
PURPOSE: Good performance status is widely known as a superior prognostic predictor. However, some patients have large survival differences despite having good performance status that are influenced by certain prognostic factors. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline host- or tumor-relat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Neoplasia Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2016.04.004 |
_version_ | 1782437600558055424 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jin Qu, Jinglei Li, Zhi Che, Xiaofang Zhang, Jingdong Liu, Jing Teng, Yuee Jin, Bo Zhao, Mingfang Liu, Yunpeng Qu, Xiujuan |
author_facet | Wang, Jin Qu, Jinglei Li, Zhi Che, Xiaofang Zhang, Jingdong Liu, Jing Teng, Yuee Jin, Bo Zhao, Mingfang Liu, Yunpeng Qu, Xiujuan |
author_sort | Wang, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Good performance status is widely known as a superior prognostic predictor. However, some patients have large survival differences despite having good performance status that are influenced by certain prognostic factors. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline host- or tumor-related factors and to establish a prognostic model for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 310 metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Prognostic significance was determined using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Incorporating all pretreatment indicators, a prognostic model was established. Overall survival outcomes were compared with different risk groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, no previous gastrectomy [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.85], number of distant metastatic sites (HR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.11-1.96), bone metastasis (HR = 2.20; 95% CI = 1.16–4.18), liver metastasis (HR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.31-2.39), and an elevated neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (HR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.04-1.79) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Patients were categorized into three risk groups according to their risk scores. Median survival times for the low-risk (0 point), intermediate-risk (1-3 points), and high-risk (≥ 4 points) groups were 19.7, 10.7 and 5.1 months, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model was developed that could facilitate risk stratification for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy to help clinicians choose an applicable treatment based on the estimated prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4907898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Neoplasia Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49078982016-06-22 A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy() Wang, Jin Qu, Jinglei Li, Zhi Che, Xiaofang Zhang, Jingdong Liu, Jing Teng, Yuee Jin, Bo Zhao, Mingfang Liu, Yunpeng Qu, Xiujuan Transl Oncol Original article PURPOSE: Good performance status is widely known as a superior prognostic predictor. However, some patients have large survival differences despite having good performance status that are influenced by certain prognostic factors. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline host- or tumor-related factors and to establish a prognostic model for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 310 metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Prognostic significance was determined using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Incorporating all pretreatment indicators, a prognostic model was established. Overall survival outcomes were compared with different risk groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, no previous gastrectomy [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.85], number of distant metastatic sites (HR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.11-1.96), bone metastasis (HR = 2.20; 95% CI = 1.16–4.18), liver metastasis (HR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.31-2.39), and an elevated neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (HR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.04-1.79) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Patients were categorized into three risk groups according to their risk scores. Median survival times for the low-risk (0 point), intermediate-risk (1-3 points), and high-risk (≥ 4 points) groups were 19.7, 10.7 and 5.1 months, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model was developed that could facilitate risk stratification for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy to help clinicians choose an applicable treatment based on the estimated prognosis. Neoplasia Press 2016-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4907898/ /pubmed/27267846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2016.04.004 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original article Wang, Jin Qu, Jinglei Li, Zhi Che, Xiaofang Zhang, Jingdong Liu, Jing Teng, Yuee Jin, Bo Zhao, Mingfang Liu, Yunpeng Qu, Xiujuan A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy() |
title | A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy() |
title_full | A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy() |
title_fullStr | A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy() |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy() |
title_short | A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy() |
title_sort | prognostic model in metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy() |
topic | Original article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2016.04.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjin aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT qujinglei aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT lizhi aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT chexiaofang aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT zhangjingdong aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT liujing aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT tengyuee aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT jinbo aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT zhaomingfang aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT liuyunpeng aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT quxiujuan aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT wangjin prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT qujinglei prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT lizhi prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT chexiaofang prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT zhangjingdong prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT liujing prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT tengyuee prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT jinbo prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT zhaomingfang prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT liuyunpeng prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy AT quxiujuan prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy |