Cargando…

A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy()

PURPOSE: Good performance status is widely known as a superior prognostic predictor. However, some patients have large survival differences despite having good performance status that are influenced by certain prognostic factors. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline host- or tumor-relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jin, Qu, Jinglei, Li, Zhi, Che, Xiaofang, Zhang, Jingdong, Liu, Jing, Teng, Yuee, Jin, Bo, Zhao, Mingfang, Liu, Yunpeng, Qu, Xiujuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2016.04.004
_version_ 1782437600558055424
author Wang, Jin
Qu, Jinglei
Li, Zhi
Che, Xiaofang
Zhang, Jingdong
Liu, Jing
Teng, Yuee
Jin, Bo
Zhao, Mingfang
Liu, Yunpeng
Qu, Xiujuan
author_facet Wang, Jin
Qu, Jinglei
Li, Zhi
Che, Xiaofang
Zhang, Jingdong
Liu, Jing
Teng, Yuee
Jin, Bo
Zhao, Mingfang
Liu, Yunpeng
Qu, Xiujuan
author_sort Wang, Jin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Good performance status is widely known as a superior prognostic predictor. However, some patients have large survival differences despite having good performance status that are influenced by certain prognostic factors. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline host- or tumor-related factors and to establish a prognostic model for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 310 metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Prognostic significance was determined using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Incorporating all pretreatment indicators, a prognostic model was established. Overall survival outcomes were compared with different risk groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, no previous gastrectomy [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.85], number of distant metastatic sites (HR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.11-1.96), bone metastasis (HR = 2.20; 95% CI = 1.16–4.18), liver metastasis (HR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.31-2.39), and an elevated neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (HR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.04-1.79) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Patients were categorized into three risk groups according to their risk scores. Median survival times for the low-risk (0 point), intermediate-risk (1-3 points), and high-risk (≥ 4 points) groups were 19.7, 10.7 and 5.1 months, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model was developed that could facilitate risk stratification for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy to help clinicians choose an applicable treatment based on the estimated prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4907898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49078982016-06-22 A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy() Wang, Jin Qu, Jinglei Li, Zhi Che, Xiaofang Zhang, Jingdong Liu, Jing Teng, Yuee Jin, Bo Zhao, Mingfang Liu, Yunpeng Qu, Xiujuan Transl Oncol Original article PURPOSE: Good performance status is widely known as a superior prognostic predictor. However, some patients have large survival differences despite having good performance status that are influenced by certain prognostic factors. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline host- or tumor-related factors and to establish a prognostic model for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 310 metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Prognostic significance was determined using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Incorporating all pretreatment indicators, a prognostic model was established. Overall survival outcomes were compared with different risk groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, no previous gastrectomy [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.85], number of distant metastatic sites (HR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.11-1.96), bone metastasis (HR = 2.20; 95% CI = 1.16–4.18), liver metastasis (HR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.31-2.39), and an elevated neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (HR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.04-1.79) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Patients were categorized into three risk groups according to their risk scores. Median survival times for the low-risk (0 point), intermediate-risk (1-3 points), and high-risk (≥ 4 points) groups were 19.7, 10.7 and 5.1 months, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model was developed that could facilitate risk stratification for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy to help clinicians choose an applicable treatment based on the estimated prognosis. Neoplasia Press 2016-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4907898/ /pubmed/27267846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2016.04.004 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
Wang, Jin
Qu, Jinglei
Li, Zhi
Che, Xiaofang
Zhang, Jingdong
Liu, Jing
Teng, Yuee
Jin, Bo
Zhao, Mingfang
Liu, Yunpeng
Qu, Xiujuan
A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy()
title A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy()
title_full A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy()
title_fullStr A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy()
title_full_unstemmed A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy()
title_short A Prognostic Model in Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer Patients with Good Performance Status Who Received First-Line Chemotherapy()
title_sort prognostic model in metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received first-line chemotherapy()
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4907898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27267846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2016.04.004
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjin aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT qujinglei aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT lizhi aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT chexiaofang aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT zhangjingdong aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT liujing aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT tengyuee aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT jinbo aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT zhaomingfang aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT liuyunpeng aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT quxiujuan aprognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT wangjin prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT qujinglei prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT lizhi prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT chexiaofang prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT zhangjingdong prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT liujing prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT tengyuee prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT jinbo prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT zhaomingfang prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT liuyunpeng prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy
AT quxiujuan prognosticmodelinmetastaticorrecurrentgastriccancerpatientswithgoodperformancestatuswhoreceivedfirstlinechemotherapy