Cargando…
Do audition electives impact match success?
PURPOSE: The authors sought to determine the value of the audition elective to the overall success of medical students in the match. METHOD: The authors surveyed 1,335 fourth-year medical students at 10 medical schools in 2013. The study took place over a 2-month period immediately following the mat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Co-Action Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27301380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.31325 |
_version_ | 1782437611960270848 |
---|---|
author | Higgins, Elizabeth Newman, Linnie Halligan, Katherine Miller, Margaret Schwab, Sally Kosowicz, Lynn |
author_facet | Higgins, Elizabeth Newman, Linnie Halligan, Katherine Miller, Margaret Schwab, Sally Kosowicz, Lynn |
author_sort | Higgins, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The authors sought to determine the value of the audition elective to the overall success of medical students in the match. METHOD: The authors surveyed 1,335 fourth-year medical students at 10 medical schools in 2013. The study took place over a 2-month period immediately following the match. Medical students were emailed a 14-question survey and asked about audition electives, rank order, and cost of ‘away’ rotations. RESULTS: One hundred percent of students wishing to match in otolaryngology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, radiation oncology, and urology took the audition electives. The difference by specialty in the proportion of students who took an audition was statistically significant (p<0.001). Of the students who auditioned, 71% matched at one of their top three choices compared with 84% of non-auditioners who matched to one of their top three choices (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Students performed a large number of ‘away’ rotations as ‘auditions’ in order to improve their chances in the match. For certain competitive specialties, virtually all students auditioned. Overall, students who did not audition were just as successful as or more successful than students who did audition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4908064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Co-Action Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49080642016-06-22 Do audition electives impact match success? Higgins, Elizabeth Newman, Linnie Halligan, Katherine Miller, Margaret Schwab, Sally Kosowicz, Lynn Med Educ Online Short Communication PURPOSE: The authors sought to determine the value of the audition elective to the overall success of medical students in the match. METHOD: The authors surveyed 1,335 fourth-year medical students at 10 medical schools in 2013. The study took place over a 2-month period immediately following the match. Medical students were emailed a 14-question survey and asked about audition electives, rank order, and cost of ‘away’ rotations. RESULTS: One hundred percent of students wishing to match in otolaryngology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, radiation oncology, and urology took the audition electives. The difference by specialty in the proportion of students who took an audition was statistically significant (p<0.001). Of the students who auditioned, 71% matched at one of their top three choices compared with 84% of non-auditioners who matched to one of their top three choices (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Students performed a large number of ‘away’ rotations as ‘auditions’ in order to improve their chances in the match. For certain competitive specialties, virtually all students auditioned. Overall, students who did not audition were just as successful as or more successful than students who did audition. Co-Action Publishing 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4908064/ /pubmed/27301380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.31325 Text en © 2016 Elizabeth Higgins et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Higgins, Elizabeth Newman, Linnie Halligan, Katherine Miller, Margaret Schwab, Sally Kosowicz, Lynn Do audition electives impact match success? |
title | Do audition electives impact match success? |
title_full | Do audition electives impact match success? |
title_fullStr | Do audition electives impact match success? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do audition electives impact match success? |
title_short | Do audition electives impact match success? |
title_sort | do audition electives impact match success? |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27301380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.31325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT higginselizabeth doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess AT newmanlinnie doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess AT halligankatherine doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess AT millermargaret doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess AT schwabsally doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess AT kosowiczlynn doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess |