Cargando…

Do audition electives impact match success?

PURPOSE: The authors sought to determine the value of the audition elective to the overall success of medical students in the match. METHOD: The authors surveyed 1,335 fourth-year medical students at 10 medical schools in 2013. The study took place over a 2-month period immediately following the mat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higgins, Elizabeth, Newman, Linnie, Halligan, Katherine, Miller, Margaret, Schwab, Sally, Kosowicz, Lynn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27301380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.31325
_version_ 1782437611960270848
author Higgins, Elizabeth
Newman, Linnie
Halligan, Katherine
Miller, Margaret
Schwab, Sally
Kosowicz, Lynn
author_facet Higgins, Elizabeth
Newman, Linnie
Halligan, Katherine
Miller, Margaret
Schwab, Sally
Kosowicz, Lynn
author_sort Higgins, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The authors sought to determine the value of the audition elective to the overall success of medical students in the match. METHOD: The authors surveyed 1,335 fourth-year medical students at 10 medical schools in 2013. The study took place over a 2-month period immediately following the match. Medical students were emailed a 14-question survey and asked about audition electives, rank order, and cost of ‘away’ rotations. RESULTS: One hundred percent of students wishing to match in otolaryngology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, radiation oncology, and urology took the audition electives. The difference by specialty in the proportion of students who took an audition was statistically significant (p<0.001). Of the students who auditioned, 71% matched at one of their top three choices compared with 84% of non-auditioners who matched to one of their top three choices (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Students performed a large number of ‘away’ rotations as ‘auditions’ in order to improve their chances in the match. For certain competitive specialties, virtually all students auditioned. Overall, students who did not audition were just as successful as or more successful than students who did audition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4908064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49080642016-06-22 Do audition electives impact match success? Higgins, Elizabeth Newman, Linnie Halligan, Katherine Miller, Margaret Schwab, Sally Kosowicz, Lynn Med Educ Online Short Communication PURPOSE: The authors sought to determine the value of the audition elective to the overall success of medical students in the match. METHOD: The authors surveyed 1,335 fourth-year medical students at 10 medical schools in 2013. The study took place over a 2-month period immediately following the match. Medical students were emailed a 14-question survey and asked about audition electives, rank order, and cost of ‘away’ rotations. RESULTS: One hundred percent of students wishing to match in otolaryngology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, radiation oncology, and urology took the audition electives. The difference by specialty in the proportion of students who took an audition was statistically significant (p<0.001). Of the students who auditioned, 71% matched at one of their top three choices compared with 84% of non-auditioners who matched to one of their top three choices (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Students performed a large number of ‘away’ rotations as ‘auditions’ in order to improve their chances in the match. For certain competitive specialties, virtually all students auditioned. Overall, students who did not audition were just as successful as or more successful than students who did audition. Co-Action Publishing 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4908064/ /pubmed/27301380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.31325 Text en © 2016 Elizabeth Higgins et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Higgins, Elizabeth
Newman, Linnie
Halligan, Katherine
Miller, Margaret
Schwab, Sally
Kosowicz, Lynn
Do audition electives impact match success?
title Do audition electives impact match success?
title_full Do audition electives impact match success?
title_fullStr Do audition electives impact match success?
title_full_unstemmed Do audition electives impact match success?
title_short Do audition electives impact match success?
title_sort do audition electives impact match success?
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27301380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.31325
work_keys_str_mv AT higginselizabeth doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess
AT newmanlinnie doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess
AT halligankatherine doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess
AT millermargaret doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess
AT schwabsally doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess
AT kosowiczlynn doauditionelectivesimpactmatchsuccess