Cargando…
Convolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding
Motivation: Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have outperformed conventional methods in modeling the sequence specificity of DNA–protein binding. Yet inappropriate CNN architectures can yield poorer performance than simpler models. Thus an in-depth understanding of how to match CNN architecture to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw255 |
_version_ | 1782437662820401152 |
---|---|
author | Zeng, Haoyang Edwards, Matthew D. Liu, Ge Gifford, David K. |
author_facet | Zeng, Haoyang Edwards, Matthew D. Liu, Ge Gifford, David K. |
author_sort | Zeng, Haoyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motivation: Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have outperformed conventional methods in modeling the sequence specificity of DNA–protein binding. Yet inappropriate CNN architectures can yield poorer performance than simpler models. Thus an in-depth understanding of how to match CNN architecture to a given task is needed to fully harness the power of CNNs for computational biology applications. Results: We present a systematic exploration of CNN architectures for predicting DNA sequence binding using a large compendium of transcription factor datasets. We identify the best-performing architectures by varying CNN width, depth and pooling designs. We find that adding convolutional kernels to a network is important for motif-based tasks. We show the benefits of CNNs in learning rich higher-order sequence features, such as secondary motifs and local sequence context, by comparing network performance on multiple modeling tasks ranging in difficulty. We also demonstrate how careful construction of sequence benchmark datasets, using approaches that control potentially confounding effects like positional or motif strength bias, is critical in making fair comparisons between competing methods. We explore how to establish the sufficiency of training data for these learning tasks, and we have created a flexible cloud-based framework that permits the rapid exploration of alternative neural network architectures for problems in computational biology. Availability and Implementation: All the models analyzed are available at http://cnn.csail.mit.edu. Contact: gifford@mit.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4908339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49083392016-06-17 Convolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding Zeng, Haoyang Edwards, Matthew D. Liu, Ge Gifford, David K. Bioinformatics Ismb 2016 Proceedings July 8 to July 12, 2016, Orlando, Florida Motivation: Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have outperformed conventional methods in modeling the sequence specificity of DNA–protein binding. Yet inappropriate CNN architectures can yield poorer performance than simpler models. Thus an in-depth understanding of how to match CNN architecture to a given task is needed to fully harness the power of CNNs for computational biology applications. Results: We present a systematic exploration of CNN architectures for predicting DNA sequence binding using a large compendium of transcription factor datasets. We identify the best-performing architectures by varying CNN width, depth and pooling designs. We find that adding convolutional kernels to a network is important for motif-based tasks. We show the benefits of CNNs in learning rich higher-order sequence features, such as secondary motifs and local sequence context, by comparing network performance on multiple modeling tasks ranging in difficulty. We also demonstrate how careful construction of sequence benchmark datasets, using approaches that control potentially confounding effects like positional or motif strength bias, is critical in making fair comparisons between competing methods. We explore how to establish the sufficiency of training data for these learning tasks, and we have created a flexible cloud-based framework that permits the rapid exploration of alternative neural network architectures for problems in computational biology. Availability and Implementation: All the models analyzed are available at http://cnn.csail.mit.edu. Contact: gifford@mit.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2016-06-15 2016-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4908339/ /pubmed/27307608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw255 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Ismb 2016 Proceedings July 8 to July 12, 2016, Orlando, Florida Zeng, Haoyang Edwards, Matthew D. Liu, Ge Gifford, David K. Convolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding |
title | Convolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding |
title_full | Convolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding |
title_fullStr | Convolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding |
title_full_unstemmed | Convolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding |
title_short | Convolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding |
title_sort | convolutional neural network architectures for predicting dna–protein binding |
topic | Ismb 2016 Proceedings July 8 to July 12, 2016, Orlando, Florida |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw255 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zenghaoyang convolutionalneuralnetworkarchitecturesforpredictingdnaproteinbinding AT edwardsmatthewd convolutionalneuralnetworkarchitecturesforpredictingdnaproteinbinding AT liuge convolutionalneuralnetworkarchitecturesforpredictingdnaproteinbinding AT gifforddavidk convolutionalneuralnetworkarchitecturesforpredictingdnaproteinbinding |