Cargando…
Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks
Motivation: Underrepresentation of racial groups represents an important challenge and major gap in phenomics research. Most of the current human phenomics research is based primarily on European populations; hence it is an important challenge to expand it to consider other population groups. One ap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw282 |
_version_ | 1782437669122342912 |
---|---|
author | Glicksberg, Benjamin S. Li, Li Badgeley, Marcus A. Shameer, Khader Kosoy, Roman Beckmann, Noam D. Pho, Nam Hakenberg, Jörg Ma, Meng Ayers, Kristin L. Hoffman, Gabriel E. Dan Li, Shuyu Schadt, Eric E. Patel, Chirag J. Chen, Rong Dudley, Joel T. |
author_facet | Glicksberg, Benjamin S. Li, Li Badgeley, Marcus A. Shameer, Khader Kosoy, Roman Beckmann, Noam D. Pho, Nam Hakenberg, Jörg Ma, Meng Ayers, Kristin L. Hoffman, Gabriel E. Dan Li, Shuyu Schadt, Eric E. Patel, Chirag J. Chen, Rong Dudley, Joel T. |
author_sort | Glicksberg, Benjamin S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motivation: Underrepresentation of racial groups represents an important challenge and major gap in phenomics research. Most of the current human phenomics research is based primarily on European populations; hence it is an important challenge to expand it to consider other population groups. One approach is to utilize data from EMR databases that contain patient data from diverse demographics and ancestries. The implications of this racial underrepresentation of data can be profound regarding effects on the healthcare delivery and actionability. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first attempt to perform comparative, population-scale analyses of disease networks across three different populations, namely Caucasian (EA), African American (AA) and Hispanic/Latino (HL). Results: We compared susceptibility profiles and temporal connectivity patterns for 1988 diseases and 37 282 disease pairs represented in a clinical population of 1 025 573 patients. Accordingly, we revealed appreciable differences in disease susceptibility, temporal patterns, network structure and underlying disease connections between EA, AA and HL populations. We found 2158 significantly comorbid diseases for the EA cohort, 3265 for AA and 672 for HL. We further outlined key disease pair associations unique to each population as well as categorical enrichments of these pairs. Finally, we identified 51 key ‘hub’ diseases that are the focal points in the race-centric networks and of particular clinical importance. Incorporating race-specific disease comorbidity patterns will produce a more accurate and complete picture of the disease landscape overall and could support more precise understanding of disease relationships and patient management towards improved clinical outcomes. Contacts: rong.chen@mssm.edu or joel.dudley@mssm.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4908366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49083662016-06-17 Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks Glicksberg, Benjamin S. Li, Li Badgeley, Marcus A. Shameer, Khader Kosoy, Roman Beckmann, Noam D. Pho, Nam Hakenberg, Jörg Ma, Meng Ayers, Kristin L. Hoffman, Gabriel E. Dan Li, Shuyu Schadt, Eric E. Patel, Chirag J. Chen, Rong Dudley, Joel T. Bioinformatics Ismb 2016 Proceedings July 8 to July 12, 2016, Orlando, Florida Motivation: Underrepresentation of racial groups represents an important challenge and major gap in phenomics research. Most of the current human phenomics research is based primarily on European populations; hence it is an important challenge to expand it to consider other population groups. One approach is to utilize data from EMR databases that contain patient data from diverse demographics and ancestries. The implications of this racial underrepresentation of data can be profound regarding effects on the healthcare delivery and actionability. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first attempt to perform comparative, population-scale analyses of disease networks across three different populations, namely Caucasian (EA), African American (AA) and Hispanic/Latino (HL). Results: We compared susceptibility profiles and temporal connectivity patterns for 1988 diseases and 37 282 disease pairs represented in a clinical population of 1 025 573 patients. Accordingly, we revealed appreciable differences in disease susceptibility, temporal patterns, network structure and underlying disease connections between EA, AA and HL populations. We found 2158 significantly comorbid diseases for the EA cohort, 3265 for AA and 672 for HL. We further outlined key disease pair associations unique to each population as well as categorical enrichments of these pairs. Finally, we identified 51 key ‘hub’ diseases that are the focal points in the race-centric networks and of particular clinical importance. Incorporating race-specific disease comorbidity patterns will produce a more accurate and complete picture of the disease landscape overall and could support more precise understanding of disease relationships and patient management towards improved clinical outcomes. Contacts: rong.chen@mssm.edu or joel.dudley@mssm.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2016-06-15 2016-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4908366/ /pubmed/27307606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw282 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Ismb 2016 Proceedings July 8 to July 12, 2016, Orlando, Florida Glicksberg, Benjamin S. Li, Li Badgeley, Marcus A. Shameer, Khader Kosoy, Roman Beckmann, Noam D. Pho, Nam Hakenberg, Jörg Ma, Meng Ayers, Kristin L. Hoffman, Gabriel E. Dan Li, Shuyu Schadt, Eric E. Patel, Chirag J. Chen, Rong Dudley, Joel T. Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks |
title | Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks |
title_full | Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks |
title_fullStr | Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks |
title_short | Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks |
title_sort | comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks |
topic | Ismb 2016 Proceedings July 8 to July 12, 2016, Orlando, Florida |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glicksbergbenjamins comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT lili comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT badgeleymarcusa comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT shameerkhader comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT kosoyroman comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT beckmannnoamd comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT phonam comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT hakenbergjorg comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT mameng comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT ayerskristinl comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT hoffmangabriele comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT danlishuyu comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT schadterice comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT patelchiragj comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT chenrong comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks AT dudleyjoelt comparativeanalysesofpopulationscalephenomicdatainelectronicmedicalrecordsrevealracespecificdiseasenetworks |