Cargando…
Different N—H⋯π interactions in two indole derivatives
We describe the syntheses and crystal structures of two indole derivatives, namely 6-isopropyl-3-(2-nitro-1-phenylethyl)-1H-indole, C(19)H(20)N(2)O(2), (I), and 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(2-nitro-1-phenylethyl)-1H-indole, C(23)H(20)N(2)O(3), (II); the latter crystallizes with two molecules (A an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27308022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016006162 |
Sumario: | We describe the syntheses and crystal structures of two indole derivatives, namely 6-isopropyl-3-(2-nitro-1-phenylethyl)-1H-indole, C(19)H(20)N(2)O(2), (I), and 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(2-nitro-1-phenylethyl)-1H-indole, C(23)H(20)N(2)O(3), (II); the latter crystallizes with two molecules (A and B) with similar conformations (r.m.s. overlay fit = 0.139 Å) in the asymmetric unit. Despite the presence of O atoms as potential acceptors for classical hydrogen bonds, the dominant intermolecular interaction in each crystal is an N—H⋯π bond, which generates chains in (I) and A+A and B+B inversion dimers in (II). A different aromatic ring acts as the acceptor in each case. The packing is consolidated by C—H⋯π interactions in each case but aromatic π–π stacking interactions are absent. |
---|