Cargando…

Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system

BACKGROUND: A systematic approach to the appropriate use of the open abdomen strategy has not been described. We propose three fundamental reasons for the use of this strategy, anatomical, physiological and logistical. Anatomical reasons pertain to the inability to bring the fascial edges together i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rezende-Neto, Joao, Rice, Timothy, Abreu, Emanuelle Savio, Rotstein, Ori, Rizoli, Sandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0083-4
_version_ 1782437725155098624
author Rezende-Neto, Joao
Rice, Timothy
Abreu, Emanuelle Savio
Rotstein, Ori
Rizoli, Sandro
author_facet Rezende-Neto, Joao
Rice, Timothy
Abreu, Emanuelle Savio
Rotstein, Ori
Rizoli, Sandro
author_sort Rezende-Neto, Joao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A systematic approach to the appropriate use of the open abdomen strategy has not been described. We propose three fundamental reasons for the use of this strategy, anatomical, physiological and logistical. Anatomical reasons pertain to the inability to bring the fascial edges together including soft tissue defects. Physiological reasons relate to features of systemic dysfunction. Logistical reasons involve any anticipated abdominal re-intervention while preserving fascia. These categories occur either as a single reason or in any combination. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study of patients with open abdomens in trauma and acute abdomen. Surgeons were asked to select from the three reasons (single or any combination of) their motivation for using the open abdomen upon completion of the initial operation. Patients were compared using the non-parametric Wilcoxon two-sample test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables; Statistical significance set at P-value ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive patients with open abdomens were evaluated (Jan. 1- Dec. 31, 2012). Mean age was 38.8 years, 32 were male, 39 (86.7 %) sustained trauma. The most common single reason for the open abdomen was physiological (24.4 %), 33 patients had multiple reasons, the most common combination being anatomical and physiological (22.2 %). A physiological reason was linked to: lower pH, higher lactate, and lower systolic blood pressure on admission (p < 0.05). A logistical reason was associated with earlier primary fascial closure, intra-operative packing, and bowel left in discontinuity. Logistic regression and adjusted odds ratio of primary fascial closure was: physiological (0.08, 95 % CI, 0.01–0.92, p = 0.043); logistical (6.03, 95 % CI, 1.13–32.29, p = 0.036); and anatomical (0.83, 95 % CI, 0.16–4.18, p = 0.816). CONCLUSION: We defined three basic indications for the use of the open abdomen, anatomical physiological and logistical. These indications establish a practical and comprehensive terminology that could help to promote appropriate use of the open abdomen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4908692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49086922016-06-16 Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system Rezende-Neto, Joao Rice, Timothy Abreu, Emanuelle Savio Rotstein, Ori Rizoli, Sandro World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: A systematic approach to the appropriate use of the open abdomen strategy has not been described. We propose three fundamental reasons for the use of this strategy, anatomical, physiological and logistical. Anatomical reasons pertain to the inability to bring the fascial edges together including soft tissue defects. Physiological reasons relate to features of systemic dysfunction. Logistical reasons involve any anticipated abdominal re-intervention while preserving fascia. These categories occur either as a single reason or in any combination. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study of patients with open abdomens in trauma and acute abdomen. Surgeons were asked to select from the three reasons (single or any combination of) their motivation for using the open abdomen upon completion of the initial operation. Patients were compared using the non-parametric Wilcoxon two-sample test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables; Statistical significance set at P-value ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive patients with open abdomens were evaluated (Jan. 1- Dec. 31, 2012). Mean age was 38.8 years, 32 were male, 39 (86.7 %) sustained trauma. The most common single reason for the open abdomen was physiological (24.4 %), 33 patients had multiple reasons, the most common combination being anatomical and physiological (22.2 %). A physiological reason was linked to: lower pH, higher lactate, and lower systolic blood pressure on admission (p < 0.05). A logistical reason was associated with earlier primary fascial closure, intra-operative packing, and bowel left in discontinuity. Logistic regression and adjusted odds ratio of primary fascial closure was: physiological (0.08, 95 % CI, 0.01–0.92, p = 0.043); logistical (6.03, 95 % CI, 1.13–32.29, p = 0.036); and anatomical (0.83, 95 % CI, 0.16–4.18, p = 0.816). CONCLUSION: We defined three basic indications for the use of the open abdomen, anatomical physiological and logistical. These indications establish a practical and comprehensive terminology that could help to promote appropriate use of the open abdomen. BioMed Central 2016-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4908692/ /pubmed/27307788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0083-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rezende-Neto, Joao
Rice, Timothy
Abreu, Emanuelle Savio
Rotstein, Ori
Rizoli, Sandro
Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system
title Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system
title_full Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system
title_fullStr Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system
title_short Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system
title_sort anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0083-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rezendenetojoao anatomicalphysiologicalandlogisticalindicationsfortheopenabdomenaproposalforanewclassificationsystem
AT ricetimothy anatomicalphysiologicalandlogisticalindicationsfortheopenabdomenaproposalforanewclassificationsystem
AT abreuemanuellesavio anatomicalphysiologicalandlogisticalindicationsfortheopenabdomenaproposalforanewclassificationsystem
AT rotsteinori anatomicalphysiologicalandlogisticalindicationsfortheopenabdomenaproposalforanewclassificationsystem
AT rizolisandro anatomicalphysiologicalandlogisticalindicationsfortheopenabdomenaproposalforanewclassificationsystem