Cargando…
Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system
BACKGROUND: A systematic approach to the appropriate use of the open abdomen strategy has not been described. We propose three fundamental reasons for the use of this strategy, anatomical, physiological and logistical. Anatomical reasons pertain to the inability to bring the fascial edges together i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0083-4 |
_version_ | 1782437725155098624 |
---|---|
author | Rezende-Neto, Joao Rice, Timothy Abreu, Emanuelle Savio Rotstein, Ori Rizoli, Sandro |
author_facet | Rezende-Neto, Joao Rice, Timothy Abreu, Emanuelle Savio Rotstein, Ori Rizoli, Sandro |
author_sort | Rezende-Neto, Joao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A systematic approach to the appropriate use of the open abdomen strategy has not been described. We propose three fundamental reasons for the use of this strategy, anatomical, physiological and logistical. Anatomical reasons pertain to the inability to bring the fascial edges together including soft tissue defects. Physiological reasons relate to features of systemic dysfunction. Logistical reasons involve any anticipated abdominal re-intervention while preserving fascia. These categories occur either as a single reason or in any combination. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study of patients with open abdomens in trauma and acute abdomen. Surgeons were asked to select from the three reasons (single or any combination of) their motivation for using the open abdomen upon completion of the initial operation. Patients were compared using the non-parametric Wilcoxon two-sample test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables; Statistical significance set at P-value ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive patients with open abdomens were evaluated (Jan. 1- Dec. 31, 2012). Mean age was 38.8 years, 32 were male, 39 (86.7 %) sustained trauma. The most common single reason for the open abdomen was physiological (24.4 %), 33 patients had multiple reasons, the most common combination being anatomical and physiological (22.2 %). A physiological reason was linked to: lower pH, higher lactate, and lower systolic blood pressure on admission (p < 0.05). A logistical reason was associated with earlier primary fascial closure, intra-operative packing, and bowel left in discontinuity. Logistic regression and adjusted odds ratio of primary fascial closure was: physiological (0.08, 95 % CI, 0.01–0.92, p = 0.043); logistical (6.03, 95 % CI, 1.13–32.29, p = 0.036); and anatomical (0.83, 95 % CI, 0.16–4.18, p = 0.816). CONCLUSION: We defined three basic indications for the use of the open abdomen, anatomical physiological and logistical. These indications establish a practical and comprehensive terminology that could help to promote appropriate use of the open abdomen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4908692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49086922016-06-16 Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system Rezende-Neto, Joao Rice, Timothy Abreu, Emanuelle Savio Rotstein, Ori Rizoli, Sandro World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: A systematic approach to the appropriate use of the open abdomen strategy has not been described. We propose three fundamental reasons for the use of this strategy, anatomical, physiological and logistical. Anatomical reasons pertain to the inability to bring the fascial edges together including soft tissue defects. Physiological reasons relate to features of systemic dysfunction. Logistical reasons involve any anticipated abdominal re-intervention while preserving fascia. These categories occur either as a single reason or in any combination. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study of patients with open abdomens in trauma and acute abdomen. Surgeons were asked to select from the three reasons (single or any combination of) their motivation for using the open abdomen upon completion of the initial operation. Patients were compared using the non-parametric Wilcoxon two-sample test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables; Statistical significance set at P-value ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive patients with open abdomens were evaluated (Jan. 1- Dec. 31, 2012). Mean age was 38.8 years, 32 were male, 39 (86.7 %) sustained trauma. The most common single reason for the open abdomen was physiological (24.4 %), 33 patients had multiple reasons, the most common combination being anatomical and physiological (22.2 %). A physiological reason was linked to: lower pH, higher lactate, and lower systolic blood pressure on admission (p < 0.05). A logistical reason was associated with earlier primary fascial closure, intra-operative packing, and bowel left in discontinuity. Logistic regression and adjusted odds ratio of primary fascial closure was: physiological (0.08, 95 % CI, 0.01–0.92, p = 0.043); logistical (6.03, 95 % CI, 1.13–32.29, p = 0.036); and anatomical (0.83, 95 % CI, 0.16–4.18, p = 0.816). CONCLUSION: We defined three basic indications for the use of the open abdomen, anatomical physiological and logistical. These indications establish a practical and comprehensive terminology that could help to promote appropriate use of the open abdomen. BioMed Central 2016-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4908692/ /pubmed/27307788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0083-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rezende-Neto, Joao Rice, Timothy Abreu, Emanuelle Savio Rotstein, Ori Rizoli, Sandro Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system |
title | Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system |
title_full | Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system |
title_fullStr | Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system |
title_full_unstemmed | Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system |
title_short | Anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system |
title_sort | anatomical, physiological, and logistical indications for the open abdomen: a proposal for a new classification system |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0083-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rezendenetojoao anatomicalphysiologicalandlogisticalindicationsfortheopenabdomenaproposalforanewclassificationsystem AT ricetimothy anatomicalphysiologicalandlogisticalindicationsfortheopenabdomenaproposalforanewclassificationsystem AT abreuemanuellesavio anatomicalphysiologicalandlogisticalindicationsfortheopenabdomenaproposalforanewclassificationsystem AT rotsteinori anatomicalphysiologicalandlogisticalindicationsfortheopenabdomenaproposalforanewclassificationsystem AT rizolisandro anatomicalphysiologicalandlogisticalindicationsfortheopenabdomenaproposalforanewclassificationsystem |