Cargando…

Biosimilar FSH preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings?

As patents expire on innovator products, there is increasing interest in developing biosimilar products globally. Biosimilars are not exact copies and are not considered generic versions of the reference product. They may differ in strength, purity and contain different composition of isoforms and/o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orvieto, Raoul, Seifer, David B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27301324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0167-8
_version_ 1782437731381542912
author Orvieto, Raoul
Seifer, David B.
author_facet Orvieto, Raoul
Seifer, David B.
author_sort Orvieto, Raoul
collection PubMed
description As patents expire on innovator products, there is increasing interest in developing biosimilar products globally. Biosimilars are not exact copies and are not considered generic versions of the reference product. They may differ in strength, purity and contain different composition of isoforms and/or various glycosylation profiles, with the consequent alterations in clinical efficacy or safety. Recently 2 new recombinant FSH preparations were introduced to clinical practice following randomized controlled, phase 3 clinical trials. Both, Bemfola and Ovaleap® were referred to the FSH innovator product Gonal-f™ (Follitropin alpha), and were found to yield an equivalent number of oocytes (primary end-point), following a long GnRH agonist suppressive protocol in “ideal” patients, i.e., young, normal responders. However, a closer look at these RCTs reveals a non-significant 4 % difference in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, in favor of Gonal f over the biosimilar products, accompanied by half the incidence of OHSS (2.9 vs 5.2 %, respectively). These studies were underpowered with reference to pregnancy rates, Thus, we believe that further comparative studies are needed in additional patient populations, e.g.,older,, poor responders, patients with repeated IVF failures and/or polycystic ovary syndrome, before the universal implementation of biosimilar products for clinical use. Biosimilars are actually a regulatory synonym, facilitating a fast track introduction of a FSH preparation to the COH armamentarium. We therefore recommend against interchanging or substituting innovator and biosimilar agents in clinical practice, and believe that the decision whether to use an innovator or a biosimilar product, should be reserved to the discretion of the treating physician. Furthermore, we believe the time has come that the measurement of the biological activity of FSH in humans should require other methods rather than the Steelman-Pohley assay, such as the determination of dose–response curves in defined populations of women with well-defined outcomes during COH in preparation for ART.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4908720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49087202016-06-16 Biosimilar FSH preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings? Orvieto, Raoul Seifer, David B. Reprod Biol Endocrinol Editorial As patents expire on innovator products, there is increasing interest in developing biosimilar products globally. Biosimilars are not exact copies and are not considered generic versions of the reference product. They may differ in strength, purity and contain different composition of isoforms and/or various glycosylation profiles, with the consequent alterations in clinical efficacy or safety. Recently 2 new recombinant FSH preparations were introduced to clinical practice following randomized controlled, phase 3 clinical trials. Both, Bemfola and Ovaleap® were referred to the FSH innovator product Gonal-f™ (Follitropin alpha), and were found to yield an equivalent number of oocytes (primary end-point), following a long GnRH agonist suppressive protocol in “ideal” patients, i.e., young, normal responders. However, a closer look at these RCTs reveals a non-significant 4 % difference in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, in favor of Gonal f over the biosimilar products, accompanied by half the incidence of OHSS (2.9 vs 5.2 %, respectively). These studies were underpowered with reference to pregnancy rates, Thus, we believe that further comparative studies are needed in additional patient populations, e.g.,older,, poor responders, patients with repeated IVF failures and/or polycystic ovary syndrome, before the universal implementation of biosimilar products for clinical use. Biosimilars are actually a regulatory synonym, facilitating a fast track introduction of a FSH preparation to the COH armamentarium. We therefore recommend against interchanging or substituting innovator and biosimilar agents in clinical practice, and believe that the decision whether to use an innovator or a biosimilar product, should be reserved to the discretion of the treating physician. Furthermore, we believe the time has come that the measurement of the biological activity of FSH in humans should require other methods rather than the Steelman-Pohley assay, such as the determination of dose–response curves in defined populations of women with well-defined outcomes during COH in preparation for ART. BioMed Central 2016-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4908720/ /pubmed/27301324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0167-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Editorial
Orvieto, Raoul
Seifer, David B.
Biosimilar FSH preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings?
title Biosimilar FSH preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings?
title_full Biosimilar FSH preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings?
title_fullStr Biosimilar FSH preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings?
title_full_unstemmed Biosimilar FSH preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings?
title_short Biosimilar FSH preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings?
title_sort biosimilar fsh preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings?
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27301324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0167-8
work_keys_str_mv AT orvietoraoul biosimilarfshpreparationsaretheyidenticaltwinsorjustsiblings
AT seiferdavidb biosimilarfshpreparationsaretheyidenticaltwinsorjustsiblings