Cargando…

Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: Although most seriously ill Americans wish to avoid burdensome and aggressive care at the end of life, such care is often provided unless patients or family members specifically request otherwise. Advance directives (ADs) were created to provide opportunities to set limits on aggressiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabler, Nicole B, Cooney, Elizabeth, Small, Dylan S, Troxel, Andrea B, Arnold, Robert M, White, Douglas B, Angus, Derek C, Loewenstein, George, Volpp, Kevin G, Bryce, Cindy L, Halpern, Scott D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010628
_version_ 1782437762831482880
author Gabler, Nicole B
Cooney, Elizabeth
Small, Dylan S
Troxel, Andrea B
Arnold, Robert M
White, Douglas B
Angus, Derek C
Loewenstein, George
Volpp, Kevin G
Bryce, Cindy L
Halpern, Scott D
author_facet Gabler, Nicole B
Cooney, Elizabeth
Small, Dylan S
Troxel, Andrea B
Arnold, Robert M
White, Douglas B
Angus, Derek C
Loewenstein, George
Volpp, Kevin G
Bryce, Cindy L
Halpern, Scott D
author_sort Gabler, Nicole B
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although most seriously ill Americans wish to avoid burdensome and aggressive care at the end of life, such care is often provided unless patients or family members specifically request otherwise. Advance directives (ADs) were created to provide opportunities to set limits on aggressive care near life's end. This study tests the hypothesis that redesigning ADs such that comfort-oriented care is provided as the default, rather than requiring patients to actively choose it, will promote better patient-centred outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre trial randomises seriously ill adults to receive 1 of 3 different ADs: (1) a traditional AD that requires patients to actively choose their goals of care or preferences for specific interventions (eg, feeding tube insertion) or otherwise have their care guided by their surrogates and the prevailing societal default toward aggressive care; (2) an AD that defaults to life-extending care and receipt of life-sustaining interventions, enabling patients to opt out from such care; or (3) an AD that defaults to comfort care, enabling patients to opt into life-extending care. We seek to enrol 270 patients who return complete, legally valid ADs so as to generate sufficient power to detect differences in the primary outcome of hospital-free days (days alive and not in an acute care facility). Secondary outcomes include hospital and intensive care unit admissions, costs of care, hospice usage, decision conflict and satisfaction, quality of life, concordance of preferences with care received and bereavement outcomes for surrogates of patients who die. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Boards at all trial centres, and is guided by a data safety and monitoring board and an ethics advisory board. Study results will be disseminated using methods that describe the results in ways that key stakeholders can best understand and implement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02017548; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4908890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49088902016-06-22 Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial Gabler, Nicole B Cooney, Elizabeth Small, Dylan S Troxel, Andrea B Arnold, Robert M White, Douglas B Angus, Derek C Loewenstein, George Volpp, Kevin G Bryce, Cindy L Halpern, Scott D BMJ Open Palliative Care INTRODUCTION: Although most seriously ill Americans wish to avoid burdensome and aggressive care at the end of life, such care is often provided unless patients or family members specifically request otherwise. Advance directives (ADs) were created to provide opportunities to set limits on aggressive care near life's end. This study tests the hypothesis that redesigning ADs such that comfort-oriented care is provided as the default, rather than requiring patients to actively choose it, will promote better patient-centred outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre trial randomises seriously ill adults to receive 1 of 3 different ADs: (1) a traditional AD that requires patients to actively choose their goals of care or preferences for specific interventions (eg, feeding tube insertion) or otherwise have their care guided by their surrogates and the prevailing societal default toward aggressive care; (2) an AD that defaults to life-extending care and receipt of life-sustaining interventions, enabling patients to opt out from such care; or (3) an AD that defaults to comfort care, enabling patients to opt into life-extending care. We seek to enrol 270 patients who return complete, legally valid ADs so as to generate sufficient power to detect differences in the primary outcome of hospital-free days (days alive and not in an acute care facility). Secondary outcomes include hospital and intensive care unit admissions, costs of care, hospice usage, decision conflict and satisfaction, quality of life, concordance of preferences with care received and bereavement outcomes for surrogates of patients who die. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Boards at all trial centres, and is guided by a data safety and monitoring board and an ethics advisory board. Study results will be disseminated using methods that describe the results in ways that key stakeholders can best understand and implement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02017548; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4908890/ /pubmed/27266769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010628 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Gabler, Nicole B
Cooney, Elizabeth
Small, Dylan S
Troxel, Andrea B
Arnold, Robert M
White, Douglas B
Angus, Derek C
Loewenstein, George
Volpp, Kevin G
Bryce, Cindy L
Halpern, Scott D
Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_full Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_short Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_sort default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010628
work_keys_str_mv AT gablernicoleb defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT cooneyelizabeth defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT smalldylans defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT troxelandreab defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT arnoldrobertm defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT whitedouglasb defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT angusderekc defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT loewensteingeorge defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT volppkeving defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT brycecindyl defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT halpernscottd defaultoptionsinadvancedirectivesstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial