Cargando…
Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial
INTRODUCTION: People with mobility limitations can benefit from rehabilitation programmes that provide a high dose of exercise. However, since providing a high dose of exercise is logistically challenging and resource-intensive, people in rehabilitation spend most of the day inactive. This trial aim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012074 |
_version_ | 1782437774490599424 |
---|---|
author | Hassett, Leanne van den Berg, Maayken Lindley, Richard I Crotty, Maria McCluskey, Annie van der Ploeg, Hidde P Smith, Stuart T Schurr, Karl Killington, Maggie Bongers, Bert Howard, Kirsten Heritier, Stephane Togher, Leanne Hackett, Maree Treacy, Daniel Dorsch, Simone Wong, Siobhan Scrivener, Katharine Chagpar, Sakina Weber, Heather Pearson, Ross Sherrington, Catherine |
author_facet | Hassett, Leanne van den Berg, Maayken Lindley, Richard I Crotty, Maria McCluskey, Annie van der Ploeg, Hidde P Smith, Stuart T Schurr, Karl Killington, Maggie Bongers, Bert Howard, Kirsten Heritier, Stephane Togher, Leanne Hackett, Maree Treacy, Daniel Dorsch, Simone Wong, Siobhan Scrivener, Katharine Chagpar, Sakina Weber, Heather Pearson, Ross Sherrington, Catherine |
author_sort | Hassett, Leanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: People with mobility limitations can benefit from rehabilitation programmes that provide a high dose of exercise. However, since providing a high dose of exercise is logistically challenging and resource-intensive, people in rehabilitation spend most of the day inactive. This trial aims to evaluate the effect of the addition of affordable technology to usual care on physical activity and mobility in people with mobility limitations admitted to inpatient aged and neurological rehabilitation units compared to usual care alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic, assessor blinded, parallel-group randomised trial recruiting 300 consenting rehabilitation patients with reduced mobility will be conducted. Participants will be individually randomised to intervention or control groups. The intervention group will receive technology-based exercise to target mobility and physical activity problems for 6 months. The technology will include the use of video and computer games/exercises and tablet applications as well as activity monitors. The control group will not receive any additional intervention and both groups will receive usual inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation care over the 6-month study period. The coprimary outcomes will be objectively assessed physical activity (proportion of the day spent upright) and mobility (Short Physical Performance Battery) at 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include: self-reported and objectively assessed physical activity, mobility, cognition, activity performance and participation, utility-based quality of life, balance confidence, technology self-efficacy, falls and service utilisation. Linear models will assess the effect of group allocation for each continuously scored outcome measure with baseline scores entered as a covariate. Fall rates between groups will be compared using negative binomial regression. Primary analyses will be preplanned, conducted while masked to group allocation and use an intention-to-treat approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the relevant Human Research Ethics Committees and the results will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000936628. Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4908951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49089512016-06-22 Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial Hassett, Leanne van den Berg, Maayken Lindley, Richard I Crotty, Maria McCluskey, Annie van der Ploeg, Hidde P Smith, Stuart T Schurr, Karl Killington, Maggie Bongers, Bert Howard, Kirsten Heritier, Stephane Togher, Leanne Hackett, Maree Treacy, Daniel Dorsch, Simone Wong, Siobhan Scrivener, Katharine Chagpar, Sakina Weber, Heather Pearson, Ross Sherrington, Catherine BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: People with mobility limitations can benefit from rehabilitation programmes that provide a high dose of exercise. However, since providing a high dose of exercise is logistically challenging and resource-intensive, people in rehabilitation spend most of the day inactive. This trial aims to evaluate the effect of the addition of affordable technology to usual care on physical activity and mobility in people with mobility limitations admitted to inpatient aged and neurological rehabilitation units compared to usual care alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic, assessor blinded, parallel-group randomised trial recruiting 300 consenting rehabilitation patients with reduced mobility will be conducted. Participants will be individually randomised to intervention or control groups. The intervention group will receive technology-based exercise to target mobility and physical activity problems for 6 months. The technology will include the use of video and computer games/exercises and tablet applications as well as activity monitors. The control group will not receive any additional intervention and both groups will receive usual inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation care over the 6-month study period. The coprimary outcomes will be objectively assessed physical activity (proportion of the day spent upright) and mobility (Short Physical Performance Battery) at 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include: self-reported and objectively assessed physical activity, mobility, cognition, activity performance and participation, utility-based quality of life, balance confidence, technology self-efficacy, falls and service utilisation. Linear models will assess the effect of group allocation for each continuously scored outcome measure with baseline scores entered as a covariate. Fall rates between groups will be compared using negative binomial regression. Primary analyses will be preplanned, conducted while masked to group allocation and use an intention-to-treat approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the relevant Human Research Ethics Committees and the results will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000936628. Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4908951/ /pubmed/27266776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012074 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Hassett, Leanne van den Berg, Maayken Lindley, Richard I Crotty, Maria McCluskey, Annie van der Ploeg, Hidde P Smith, Stuart T Schurr, Karl Killington, Maggie Bongers, Bert Howard, Kirsten Heritier, Stephane Togher, Leanne Hackett, Maree Treacy, Daniel Dorsch, Simone Wong, Siobhan Scrivener, Katharine Chagpar, Sakina Weber, Heather Pearson, Ross Sherrington, Catherine Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial |
title | Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial |
title_full | Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial |
title_short | Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial |
title_sort | effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the activity and mobility using technology (amount) rehabilitation trial |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hassettleanne effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT vandenbergmaayken effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT lindleyrichardi effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT crottymaria effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT mccluskeyannie effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT vanderploeghiddep effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT smithstuartt effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT schurrkarl effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT killingtonmaggie effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT bongersbert effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT howardkirsten effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT heritierstephane effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT togherleanne effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT hackettmaree effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT treacydaniel effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT dorschsimone effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT wongsiobhan effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT scrivenerkatharine effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT chagparsakina effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT weberheather effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT pearsonross effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial AT sherringtoncatherine effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial |