Cargando…

Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial

INTRODUCTION: People with mobility limitations can benefit from rehabilitation programmes that provide a high dose of exercise. However, since providing a high dose of exercise is logistically challenging and resource-intensive, people in rehabilitation spend most of the day inactive. This trial aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassett, Leanne, van den Berg, Maayken, Lindley, Richard I, Crotty, Maria, McCluskey, Annie, van der Ploeg, Hidde P, Smith, Stuart T, Schurr, Karl, Killington, Maggie, Bongers, Bert, Howard, Kirsten, Heritier, Stephane, Togher, Leanne, Hackett, Maree, Treacy, Daniel, Dorsch, Simone, Wong, Siobhan, Scrivener, Katharine, Chagpar, Sakina, Weber, Heather, Pearson, Ross, Sherrington, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012074
_version_ 1782437774490599424
author Hassett, Leanne
van den Berg, Maayken
Lindley, Richard I
Crotty, Maria
McCluskey, Annie
van der Ploeg, Hidde P
Smith, Stuart T
Schurr, Karl
Killington, Maggie
Bongers, Bert
Howard, Kirsten
Heritier, Stephane
Togher, Leanne
Hackett, Maree
Treacy, Daniel
Dorsch, Simone
Wong, Siobhan
Scrivener, Katharine
Chagpar, Sakina
Weber, Heather
Pearson, Ross
Sherrington, Catherine
author_facet Hassett, Leanne
van den Berg, Maayken
Lindley, Richard I
Crotty, Maria
McCluskey, Annie
van der Ploeg, Hidde P
Smith, Stuart T
Schurr, Karl
Killington, Maggie
Bongers, Bert
Howard, Kirsten
Heritier, Stephane
Togher, Leanne
Hackett, Maree
Treacy, Daniel
Dorsch, Simone
Wong, Siobhan
Scrivener, Katharine
Chagpar, Sakina
Weber, Heather
Pearson, Ross
Sherrington, Catherine
author_sort Hassett, Leanne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: People with mobility limitations can benefit from rehabilitation programmes that provide a high dose of exercise. However, since providing a high dose of exercise is logistically challenging and resource-intensive, people in rehabilitation spend most of the day inactive. This trial aims to evaluate the effect of the addition of affordable technology to usual care on physical activity and mobility in people with mobility limitations admitted to inpatient aged and neurological rehabilitation units compared to usual care alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic, assessor blinded, parallel-group randomised trial recruiting 300 consenting rehabilitation patients with reduced mobility will be conducted. Participants will be individually randomised to intervention or control groups. The intervention group will receive technology-based exercise to target mobility and physical activity problems for 6 months. The technology will include the use of video and computer games/exercises and tablet applications as well as activity monitors. The control group will not receive any additional intervention and both groups will receive usual inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation care over the 6-month study period. The coprimary outcomes will be objectively assessed physical activity (proportion of the day spent upright) and mobility (Short Physical Performance Battery) at 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include: self-reported and objectively assessed physical activity, mobility, cognition, activity performance and participation, utility-based quality of life, balance confidence, technology self-efficacy, falls and service utilisation. Linear models will assess the effect of group allocation for each continuously scored outcome measure with baseline scores entered as a covariate. Fall rates between groups will be compared using negative binomial regression. Primary analyses will be preplanned, conducted while masked to group allocation and use an intention-to-treat approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the relevant Human Research Ethics Committees and the results will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000936628. Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4908951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49089512016-06-22 Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial Hassett, Leanne van den Berg, Maayken Lindley, Richard I Crotty, Maria McCluskey, Annie van der Ploeg, Hidde P Smith, Stuart T Schurr, Karl Killington, Maggie Bongers, Bert Howard, Kirsten Heritier, Stephane Togher, Leanne Hackett, Maree Treacy, Daniel Dorsch, Simone Wong, Siobhan Scrivener, Katharine Chagpar, Sakina Weber, Heather Pearson, Ross Sherrington, Catherine BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: People with mobility limitations can benefit from rehabilitation programmes that provide a high dose of exercise. However, since providing a high dose of exercise is logistically challenging and resource-intensive, people in rehabilitation spend most of the day inactive. This trial aims to evaluate the effect of the addition of affordable technology to usual care on physical activity and mobility in people with mobility limitations admitted to inpatient aged and neurological rehabilitation units compared to usual care alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic, assessor blinded, parallel-group randomised trial recruiting 300 consenting rehabilitation patients with reduced mobility will be conducted. Participants will be individually randomised to intervention or control groups. The intervention group will receive technology-based exercise to target mobility and physical activity problems for 6 months. The technology will include the use of video and computer games/exercises and tablet applications as well as activity monitors. The control group will not receive any additional intervention and both groups will receive usual inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation care over the 6-month study period. The coprimary outcomes will be objectively assessed physical activity (proportion of the day spent upright) and mobility (Short Physical Performance Battery) at 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include: self-reported and objectively assessed physical activity, mobility, cognition, activity performance and participation, utility-based quality of life, balance confidence, technology self-efficacy, falls and service utilisation. Linear models will assess the effect of group allocation for each continuously scored outcome measure with baseline scores entered as a covariate. Fall rates between groups will be compared using negative binomial regression. Primary analyses will be preplanned, conducted while masked to group allocation and use an intention-to-treat approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the relevant Human Research Ethics Committees and the results will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000936628. Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4908951/ /pubmed/27266776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012074 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Hassett, Leanne
van den Berg, Maayken
Lindley, Richard I
Crotty, Maria
McCluskey, Annie
van der Ploeg, Hidde P
Smith, Stuart T
Schurr, Karl
Killington, Maggie
Bongers, Bert
Howard, Kirsten
Heritier, Stephane
Togher, Leanne
Hackett, Maree
Treacy, Daniel
Dorsch, Simone
Wong, Siobhan
Scrivener, Katharine
Chagpar, Sakina
Weber, Heather
Pearson, Ross
Sherrington, Catherine
Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial
title Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial
title_full Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial
title_fullStr Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial
title_short Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial
title_sort effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the activity and mobility using technology (amount) rehabilitation trial
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012074
work_keys_str_mv AT hassettleanne effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT vandenbergmaayken effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT lindleyrichardi effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT crottymaria effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT mccluskeyannie effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT vanderploeghiddep effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT smithstuartt effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT schurrkarl effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT killingtonmaggie effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT bongersbert effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT howardkirsten effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT heritierstephane effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT togherleanne effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT hackettmaree effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT treacydaniel effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT dorschsimone effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT wongsiobhan effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT scrivenerkatharine effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT chagparsakina effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT weberheather effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT pearsonross effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial
AT sherringtoncatherine effectofaffordabletechnologyonphysicalactivitylevelsandmobilityoutcomesinrehabilitationaprotocolfortheactivityandmobilityusingtechnologyamountrehabilitationtrial