Cargando…

The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies

OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus recommendations for reporting of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) study results. METHODS: A panel of experienced OCT researchers (including 11 neurologists, 2 ophthalmologists, and 2 neuroscientists) discussed requirements for performing and reporting q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz-Herranz, Andrés, Balk, Lisanne J., Oberwahrenbrock, Timm, Saidha, Shiv, Martinez-Lapiscina, Elena H., Lagreze, Wolf A., Schuman, Joel S., Villoslada, Pablo, Calabresi, Peter, Balcer, Laura, Petzold, Axel, Green, Ari J., Paul, Friedemann, Brandt, Alexander U., Albrecht, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27225223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002774
_version_ 1782437844129677312
author Cruz-Herranz, Andrés
Balk, Lisanne J.
Oberwahrenbrock, Timm
Saidha, Shiv
Martinez-Lapiscina, Elena H.
Lagreze, Wolf A.
Schuman, Joel S.
Villoslada, Pablo
Calabresi, Peter
Balcer, Laura
Petzold, Axel
Green, Ari J.
Paul, Friedemann
Brandt, Alexander U.
Albrecht, Philipp
author_facet Cruz-Herranz, Andrés
Balk, Lisanne J.
Oberwahrenbrock, Timm
Saidha, Shiv
Martinez-Lapiscina, Elena H.
Lagreze, Wolf A.
Schuman, Joel S.
Villoslada, Pablo
Calabresi, Peter
Balcer, Laura
Petzold, Axel
Green, Ari J.
Paul, Friedemann
Brandt, Alexander U.
Albrecht, Philipp
author_sort Cruz-Herranz, Andrés
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus recommendations for reporting of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) study results. METHODS: A panel of experienced OCT researchers (including 11 neurologists, 2 ophthalmologists, and 2 neuroscientists) discussed requirements for performing and reporting quantitative analyses of retinal morphology and developed a list of initial recommendations based on experience and previous studies. The list of recommendations was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group. RESULTS: We provide a 9-point checklist encompassing aspects deemed relevant when reporting quantitative OCT studies. The areas covered are study protocol, acquisition device, acquisition settings, scanning protocol, funduscopic imaging, postacquisition data selection, postacquisition data analysis, recommended nomenclature, and statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The Advised Protocol for OCT Study Terminology and Elements recommendations include core items to standardize and improve quality of reporting in quantitative OCT studies. The recommendations will make reporting of quantitative OCT studies more consistent and in line with existing standards for reporting research in other biomedical areas. The recommendations originated from expert consensus and thus represent Class IV evidence. They will need to be regularly adjusted according to new insights and practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4909557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49095572016-06-24 The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies Cruz-Herranz, Andrés Balk, Lisanne J. Oberwahrenbrock, Timm Saidha, Shiv Martinez-Lapiscina, Elena H. Lagreze, Wolf A. Schuman, Joel S. Villoslada, Pablo Calabresi, Peter Balcer, Laura Petzold, Axel Green, Ari J. Paul, Friedemann Brandt, Alexander U. Albrecht, Philipp Neurology Views & Reviews OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus recommendations for reporting of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) study results. METHODS: A panel of experienced OCT researchers (including 11 neurologists, 2 ophthalmologists, and 2 neuroscientists) discussed requirements for performing and reporting quantitative analyses of retinal morphology and developed a list of initial recommendations based on experience and previous studies. The list of recommendations was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group. RESULTS: We provide a 9-point checklist encompassing aspects deemed relevant when reporting quantitative OCT studies. The areas covered are study protocol, acquisition device, acquisition settings, scanning protocol, funduscopic imaging, postacquisition data selection, postacquisition data analysis, recommended nomenclature, and statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The Advised Protocol for OCT Study Terminology and Elements recommendations include core items to standardize and improve quality of reporting in quantitative OCT studies. The recommendations will make reporting of quantitative OCT studies more consistent and in line with existing standards for reporting research in other biomedical areas. The recommendations originated from expert consensus and thus represent Class IV evidence. They will need to be regularly adjusted according to new insights and practices. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4909557/ /pubmed/27225223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002774 Text en © 2016 American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Views & Reviews
Cruz-Herranz, Andrés
Balk, Lisanne J.
Oberwahrenbrock, Timm
Saidha, Shiv
Martinez-Lapiscina, Elena H.
Lagreze, Wolf A.
Schuman, Joel S.
Villoslada, Pablo
Calabresi, Peter
Balcer, Laura
Petzold, Axel
Green, Ari J.
Paul, Friedemann
Brandt, Alexander U.
Albrecht, Philipp
The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies
title The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies
title_full The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies
title_fullStr The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies
title_full_unstemmed The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies
title_short The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies
title_sort apostel recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies
topic Views & Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27225223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002774
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzherranzandres theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT balklisannej theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT oberwahrenbrocktimm theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT saidhashiv theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT martinezlapiscinaelenah theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT lagrezewolfa theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT schumanjoels theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT villosladapablo theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT calabresipeter theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT balcerlaura theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT petzoldaxel theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT greenarij theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT paulfriedemann theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT brandtalexanderu theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT albrechtphilipp theapostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT cruzherranzandres apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT balklisannej apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT oberwahrenbrocktimm apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT saidhashiv apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT martinezlapiscinaelenah apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT lagrezewolfa apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT schumanjoels apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT villosladapablo apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT calabresipeter apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT balcerlaura apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT petzoldaxel apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT greenarij apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT paulfriedemann apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT brandtalexanderu apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies
AT albrechtphilipp apostelrecommendationsforreportingquantitativeopticalcoherencetomographystudies