Cargando…

Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate and analyze incidental CT findings of traffic injury patients discharged from the ER, and to determine overall notification rates. METHODS: All traffic injury-related patient records between 01.06.2013–01.03.2013 were obtained from Derince Training...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: YIGIT, Yavuz, AYHAN, Harun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27331159
http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.13284
_version_ 1782437901387169792
author YIGIT, Yavuz
AYHAN, Harun
author_facet YIGIT, Yavuz
AYHAN, Harun
author_sort YIGIT, Yavuz
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate and analyze incidental CT findings of traffic injury patients discharged from the ER, and to determine overall notification rates. METHODS: All traffic injury-related patient records between 01.06.2013–01.03.2013 were obtained from Derince Training and Research Hospital Emergency Service using patient files and the hospital database. Brain, thorax and/or abdominal CT images of 340 patients aged between 0 to 84 years were included in the study. ER observation forms were investigated for the patients who had incidental findings on CT scanning and overall notification rates were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age of the 363 cases was 31.2 (SD 17.9, min 0, max 84) and 35.5% of patients were female (n=129) and 64.5% were male (n=234). A total of 537 CT scans were performed on 363 patients. 147, 319 and 71 CT scans were performed on the thorax, brain and abdominal, respectively. 27.3% (n=99) of scan results showed the presence of a coincidental pathology. The most common disease on scans were bone lesions (8%, n=29), followed by sinus abnormalities (7.7%, n=28). Incidental findings ratio in patients aged over 60 was 60.8%, while under 60 was 24.8%. It was found that seven patients (7.1%) were informed about the imaging results. CONCLUSION: Most of the incidental findings were found to be benign; however, 16.5% of them were considered to require in-depth investigation. Further investigations are needed to understand the clinical relevance of these findings and their effects on patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4909874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49098742016-06-21 Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident YIGIT, Yavuz AYHAN, Harun Turk J Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate and analyze incidental CT findings of traffic injury patients discharged from the ER, and to determine overall notification rates. METHODS: All traffic injury-related patient records between 01.06.2013–01.03.2013 were obtained from Derince Training and Research Hospital Emergency Service using patient files and the hospital database. Brain, thorax and/or abdominal CT images of 340 patients aged between 0 to 84 years were included in the study. ER observation forms were investigated for the patients who had incidental findings on CT scanning and overall notification rates were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age of the 363 cases was 31.2 (SD 17.9, min 0, max 84) and 35.5% of patients were female (n=129) and 64.5% were male (n=234). A total of 537 CT scans were performed on 363 patients. 147, 319 and 71 CT scans were performed on the thorax, brain and abdominal, respectively. 27.3% (n=99) of scan results showed the presence of a coincidental pathology. The most common disease on scans were bone lesions (8%, n=29), followed by sinus abnormalities (7.7%, n=28). Incidental findings ratio in patients aged over 60 was 60.8%, while under 60 was 24.8%. It was found that seven patients (7.1%) were informed about the imaging results. CONCLUSION: Most of the incidental findings were found to be benign; however, 16.5% of them were considered to require in-depth investigation. Further investigations are needed to understand the clinical relevance of these findings and their effects on patients. Elsevier 2016-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4909874/ /pubmed/27331159 http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.13284 Text en © 2014 Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey. Production and Hosting by Elsevier B.V. Originally published in [2014] by Kare Publishing. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
YIGIT, Yavuz
AYHAN, Harun
Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title_full Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title_fullStr Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title_full_unstemmed Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title_short Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title_sort incidental ct findings of patients who admitted to er following a traffic accident
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27331159
http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.13284
work_keys_str_mv AT yigityavuz incidentalctfindingsofpatientswhoadmittedtoerfollowingatrafficaccident
AT ayhanharun incidentalctfindingsofpatientswhoadmittedtoerfollowingatrafficaccident