Cargando…
Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters
OBJECTIVES: In 1981, Peter A. Stewart published a paper describing his concept for employing Strong Ion Difference. In this study we compared the HCO(3) levels and Anion Gap (AG) calculated using the classic method and the Stewart method. METHODS: Four hundred nine (409) arterial blood gases of 90 p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27437520 http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.73604 |
_version_ | 1782437922319892480 |
---|---|
author | GEZER, Mustafa BULUCU, Fatih OZTURK, Kadir KILIC, Selim KALDIRIM, Umit EYI, Yusuf Emrah |
author_facet | GEZER, Mustafa BULUCU, Fatih OZTURK, Kadir KILIC, Selim KALDIRIM, Umit EYI, Yusuf Emrah |
author_sort | GEZER, Mustafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: In 1981, Peter A. Stewart published a paper describing his concept for employing Strong Ion Difference. In this study we compared the HCO(3) levels and Anion Gap (AG) calculated using the classic method and the Stewart method. METHODS: Four hundred nine (409) arterial blood gases of 90 patients were collected retrospectively. Some were obtained from the same patients in different times and conditions. All blood samples were evaluated using the same device (ABL 800 Blood Gas Analyzer). HCO(3) level and AG were calculated using the Stewart method via the website AcidBase.org. HCO(3) levels, AG and strong ion difference (SID) were calculated using the Stewart method, incorporating the parameters of age, serum lactate, glucose, sodium, and pH, etc. RESULTS: According to classic method, the levels of HCO(3) and AG were 22.4±7.2 mEq/L and 20.1±4.1 mEq/L respectively. According to Stewart method, the levels of HCO(3) and AG were 22.6±7.4 and 19.9±4.5 mEq/L respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was strong correlation between the classic method and the Stewart method for calculating HCO(3) and AG. The Stewart method may be more effective in the evaluation of complex metabolic acidosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4909963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49099632016-07-19 Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters GEZER, Mustafa BULUCU, Fatih OZTURK, Kadir KILIC, Selim KALDIRIM, Umit EYI, Yusuf Emrah Turk J Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: In 1981, Peter A. Stewart published a paper describing his concept for employing Strong Ion Difference. In this study we compared the HCO(3) levels and Anion Gap (AG) calculated using the classic method and the Stewart method. METHODS: Four hundred nine (409) arterial blood gases of 90 patients were collected retrospectively. Some were obtained from the same patients in different times and conditions. All blood samples were evaluated using the same device (ABL 800 Blood Gas Analyzer). HCO(3) level and AG were calculated using the Stewart method via the website AcidBase.org. HCO(3) levels, AG and strong ion difference (SID) were calculated using the Stewart method, incorporating the parameters of age, serum lactate, glucose, sodium, and pH, etc. RESULTS: According to classic method, the levels of HCO(3) and AG were 22.4±7.2 mEq/L and 20.1±4.1 mEq/L respectively. According to Stewart method, the levels of HCO(3) and AG were 22.6±7.4 and 19.9±4.5 mEq/L respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was strong correlation between the classic method and the Stewart method for calculating HCO(3) and AG. The Stewart method may be more effective in the evaluation of complex metabolic acidosis. Elsevier 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4909963/ /pubmed/27437520 http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.73604 Text en © 2015 Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey. Production and Hosting by Elsevier B.V. Originally published in [2015] by Kare Publishing. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article GEZER, Mustafa BULUCU, Fatih OZTURK, Kadir KILIC, Selim KALDIRIM, Umit EYI, Yusuf Emrah Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters |
title | Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters |
title_full | Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters |
title_short | Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters |
title_sort | effectiveness of the stewart method in the evaluation of blood gas parameters |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27437520 http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.73604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gezermustafa effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters AT bulucufatih effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters AT ozturkkadir effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters AT kilicselim effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters AT kaldirimumit effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters AT eyiyusufemrah effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters |