Cargando…

Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters

OBJECTIVES: In 1981, Peter A. Stewart published a paper describing his concept for employing Strong Ion Difference. In this study we compared the HCO(3) levels and Anion Gap (AG) calculated using the classic method and the Stewart method. METHODS: Four hundred nine (409) arterial blood gases of 90 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: GEZER, Mustafa, BULUCU, Fatih, OZTURK, Kadir, KILIC, Selim, KALDIRIM, Umit, EYI, Yusuf Emrah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27437520
http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.73604
_version_ 1782437922319892480
author GEZER, Mustafa
BULUCU, Fatih
OZTURK, Kadir
KILIC, Selim
KALDIRIM, Umit
EYI, Yusuf Emrah
author_facet GEZER, Mustafa
BULUCU, Fatih
OZTURK, Kadir
KILIC, Selim
KALDIRIM, Umit
EYI, Yusuf Emrah
author_sort GEZER, Mustafa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In 1981, Peter A. Stewart published a paper describing his concept for employing Strong Ion Difference. In this study we compared the HCO(3) levels and Anion Gap (AG) calculated using the classic method and the Stewart method. METHODS: Four hundred nine (409) arterial blood gases of 90 patients were collected retrospectively. Some were obtained from the same patients in different times and conditions. All blood samples were evaluated using the same device (ABL 800 Blood Gas Analyzer). HCO(3) level and AG were calculated using the Stewart method via the website AcidBase.org. HCO(3) levels, AG and strong ion difference (SID) were calculated using the Stewart method, incorporating the parameters of age, serum lactate, glucose, sodium, and pH, etc. RESULTS: According to classic method, the levels of HCO(3) and AG were 22.4±7.2 mEq/L and 20.1±4.1 mEq/L respectively. According to Stewart method, the levels of HCO(3) and AG were 22.6±7.4 and 19.9±4.5 mEq/L respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was strong correlation between the classic method and the Stewart method for calculating HCO(3) and AG. The Stewart method may be more effective in the evaluation of complex metabolic acidosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4909963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49099632016-07-19 Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters GEZER, Mustafa BULUCU, Fatih OZTURK, Kadir KILIC, Selim KALDIRIM, Umit EYI, Yusuf Emrah Turk J Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: In 1981, Peter A. Stewart published a paper describing his concept for employing Strong Ion Difference. In this study we compared the HCO(3) levels and Anion Gap (AG) calculated using the classic method and the Stewart method. METHODS: Four hundred nine (409) arterial blood gases of 90 patients were collected retrospectively. Some were obtained from the same patients in different times and conditions. All blood samples were evaluated using the same device (ABL 800 Blood Gas Analyzer). HCO(3) level and AG were calculated using the Stewart method via the website AcidBase.org. HCO(3) levels, AG and strong ion difference (SID) were calculated using the Stewart method, incorporating the parameters of age, serum lactate, glucose, sodium, and pH, etc. RESULTS: According to classic method, the levels of HCO(3) and AG were 22.4±7.2 mEq/L and 20.1±4.1 mEq/L respectively. According to Stewart method, the levels of HCO(3) and AG were 22.6±7.4 and 19.9±4.5 mEq/L respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was strong correlation between the classic method and the Stewart method for calculating HCO(3) and AG. The Stewart method may be more effective in the evaluation of complex metabolic acidosis. Elsevier 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4909963/ /pubmed/27437520 http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.73604 Text en © 2015 Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey. Production and Hosting by Elsevier B.V. Originally published in [2015] by Kare Publishing. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
GEZER, Mustafa
BULUCU, Fatih
OZTURK, Kadir
KILIC, Selim
KALDIRIM, Umit
EYI, Yusuf Emrah
Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters
title Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters
title_full Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters
title_fullStr Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters
title_short Effectiveness of the Stewart Method in the Evaluation of Blood Gas Parameters
title_sort effectiveness of the stewart method in the evaluation of blood gas parameters
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27437520
http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.73604
work_keys_str_mv AT gezermustafa effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters
AT bulucufatih effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters
AT ozturkkadir effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters
AT kilicselim effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters
AT kaldirimumit effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters
AT eyiyusufemrah effectivenessofthestewartmethodintheevaluationofbloodgasparameters