Cargando…
An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study
Numerous problems regarding craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery are not well understood. In this study, we performed a double-center clinical study to quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of our navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery. Fifty-six patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27305855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28242 |
_version_ | 1782437962165780480 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Jiewen Wu, Jinyang Wang, Xudong Yang, Xudong Wu, Yunong Xu, Bing Shi, Jun Yu, Hongbo Cai, Min Zhang, Wenbin Zhang, Lei Sun, Hao Shen, Guofang Zhang, Shilei |
author_facet | Dai, Jiewen Wu, Jinyang Wang, Xudong Yang, Xudong Wu, Yunong Xu, Bing Shi, Jun Yu, Hongbo Cai, Min Zhang, Wenbin Zhang, Lei Sun, Hao Shen, Guofang Zhang, Shilei |
author_sort | Dai, Jiewen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Numerous problems regarding craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery are not well understood. In this study, we performed a double-center clinical study to quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of our navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery. Fifty-six patients with craniomaxillofacial disease were included and randomly divided into experimental (using our AccuNavi-A system) and control (using Strker system) groups to compare the surgical effects. The results revealed that the average pre-operative planning time was 32.32 mins vs 29.74 mins between the experimental and control group, respectively (p > 0.05). The average operative time was 295.61 mins vs 233.56 mins (p > 0.05). The point registration orientation accuracy was 0.83 mm vs 0.92 mm. The maximal average preoperative navigation orientation accuracy was 1.03 mm vs 1.17 mm. The maximal average persistent navigation orientation accuracy was 1.15 mm vs 0.09 mm. The maximal average navigation orientation accuracy after registration recovery was 1.15 mm vs 1.39 mm between the experimental and control group. All patients healed, and their function and profile improved. These findings demonstrate that although surgeons should consider the patients’ time and monetary costs, our qualified navigation surgery system and experience could offer an accurate guide during a variety of craniomaxillofacial surgeries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4910165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49101652016-06-16 An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study Dai, Jiewen Wu, Jinyang Wang, Xudong Yang, Xudong Wu, Yunong Xu, Bing Shi, Jun Yu, Hongbo Cai, Min Zhang, Wenbin Zhang, Lei Sun, Hao Shen, Guofang Zhang, Shilei Sci Rep Article Numerous problems regarding craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery are not well understood. In this study, we performed a double-center clinical study to quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of our navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery. Fifty-six patients with craniomaxillofacial disease were included and randomly divided into experimental (using our AccuNavi-A system) and control (using Strker system) groups to compare the surgical effects. The results revealed that the average pre-operative planning time was 32.32 mins vs 29.74 mins between the experimental and control group, respectively (p > 0.05). The average operative time was 295.61 mins vs 233.56 mins (p > 0.05). The point registration orientation accuracy was 0.83 mm vs 0.92 mm. The maximal average preoperative navigation orientation accuracy was 1.03 mm vs 1.17 mm. The maximal average persistent navigation orientation accuracy was 1.15 mm vs 0.09 mm. The maximal average navigation orientation accuracy after registration recovery was 1.15 mm vs 1.39 mm between the experimental and control group. All patients healed, and their function and profile improved. These findings demonstrate that although surgeons should consider the patients’ time and monetary costs, our qualified navigation surgery system and experience could offer an accurate guide during a variety of craniomaxillofacial surgeries. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4910165/ /pubmed/27305855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28242 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Dai, Jiewen Wu, Jinyang Wang, Xudong Yang, Xudong Wu, Yunong Xu, Bing Shi, Jun Yu, Hongbo Cai, Min Zhang, Wenbin Zhang, Lei Sun, Hao Shen, Guofang Zhang, Shilei An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study |
title | An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study |
title_full | An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study |
title_fullStr | An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study |
title_full_unstemmed | An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study |
title_short | An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study |
title_sort | excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27305855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daijiewen anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT wujinyang anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT wangxudong anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT yangxudong anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT wuyunong anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT xubing anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT shijun anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT yuhongbo anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT caimin anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT zhangwenbin anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT zhanglei anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT sunhao anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT shenguofang anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT zhangshilei anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT daijiewen excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT wujinyang excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT wangxudong excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT yangxudong excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT wuyunong excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT xubing excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT shijun excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT yuhongbo excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT caimin excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT zhangwenbin excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT zhanglei excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT sunhao excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT shenguofang excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy AT zhangshilei excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy |