Cargando…

An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study

Numerous problems regarding craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery are not well understood. In this study, we performed a double-center clinical study to quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of our navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery. Fifty-six patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Jiewen, Wu, Jinyang, Wang, Xudong, Yang, Xudong, Wu, Yunong, Xu, Bing, Shi, Jun, Yu, Hongbo, Cai, Min, Zhang, Wenbin, Zhang, Lei, Sun, Hao, Shen, Guofang, Zhang, Shilei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27305855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28242
_version_ 1782437962165780480
author Dai, Jiewen
Wu, Jinyang
Wang, Xudong
Yang, Xudong
Wu, Yunong
Xu, Bing
Shi, Jun
Yu, Hongbo
Cai, Min
Zhang, Wenbin
Zhang, Lei
Sun, Hao
Shen, Guofang
Zhang, Shilei
author_facet Dai, Jiewen
Wu, Jinyang
Wang, Xudong
Yang, Xudong
Wu, Yunong
Xu, Bing
Shi, Jun
Yu, Hongbo
Cai, Min
Zhang, Wenbin
Zhang, Lei
Sun, Hao
Shen, Guofang
Zhang, Shilei
author_sort Dai, Jiewen
collection PubMed
description Numerous problems regarding craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery are not well understood. In this study, we performed a double-center clinical study to quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of our navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery. Fifty-six patients with craniomaxillofacial disease were included and randomly divided into experimental (using our AccuNavi-A system) and control (using Strker system) groups to compare the surgical effects. The results revealed that the average pre-operative planning time was 32.32 mins vs 29.74 mins between the experimental and control group, respectively (p > 0.05). The average operative time was 295.61 mins vs 233.56 mins (p > 0.05). The point registration orientation accuracy was 0.83 mm vs 0.92 mm. The maximal average preoperative navigation orientation accuracy was 1.03 mm vs 1.17 mm. The maximal average persistent navigation orientation accuracy was 1.15 mm vs 0.09 mm. The maximal average navigation orientation accuracy after registration recovery was 1.15 mm vs 1.39 mm between the experimental and control group. All patients healed, and their function and profile improved. These findings demonstrate that although surgeons should consider the patients’ time and monetary costs, our qualified navigation surgery system and experience could offer an accurate guide during a variety of craniomaxillofacial surgeries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4910165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49101652016-06-16 An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study Dai, Jiewen Wu, Jinyang Wang, Xudong Yang, Xudong Wu, Yunong Xu, Bing Shi, Jun Yu, Hongbo Cai, Min Zhang, Wenbin Zhang, Lei Sun, Hao Shen, Guofang Zhang, Shilei Sci Rep Article Numerous problems regarding craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery are not well understood. In this study, we performed a double-center clinical study to quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of our navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery. Fifty-six patients with craniomaxillofacial disease were included and randomly divided into experimental (using our AccuNavi-A system) and control (using Strker system) groups to compare the surgical effects. The results revealed that the average pre-operative planning time was 32.32 mins vs 29.74 mins between the experimental and control group, respectively (p > 0.05). The average operative time was 295.61 mins vs 233.56 mins (p > 0.05). The point registration orientation accuracy was 0.83 mm vs 0.92 mm. The maximal average preoperative navigation orientation accuracy was 1.03 mm vs 1.17 mm. The maximal average persistent navigation orientation accuracy was 1.15 mm vs 0.09 mm. The maximal average navigation orientation accuracy after registration recovery was 1.15 mm vs 1.39 mm between the experimental and control group. All patients healed, and their function and profile improved. These findings demonstrate that although surgeons should consider the patients’ time and monetary costs, our qualified navigation surgery system and experience could offer an accurate guide during a variety of craniomaxillofacial surgeries. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4910165/ /pubmed/27305855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28242 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Dai, Jiewen
Wu, Jinyang
Wang, Xudong
Yang, Xudong
Wu, Yunong
Xu, Bing
Shi, Jun
Yu, Hongbo
Cai, Min
Zhang, Wenbin
Zhang, Lei
Sun, Hao
Shen, Guofang
Zhang, Shilei
An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study
title An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study
title_full An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study
title_fullStr An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study
title_full_unstemmed An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study
title_short An excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study
title_sort excellent navigation system and experience in craniomaxillofacial navigation surgery: a double-center study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27305855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28242
work_keys_str_mv AT daijiewen anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT wujinyang anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT wangxudong anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT yangxudong anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT wuyunong anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT xubing anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT shijun anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT yuhongbo anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT caimin anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT zhangwenbin anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT zhanglei anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT sunhao anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT shenguofang anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT zhangshilei anexcellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT daijiewen excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT wujinyang excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT wangxudong excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT yangxudong excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT wuyunong excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT xubing excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT shijun excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT yuhongbo excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT caimin excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT zhangwenbin excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT zhanglei excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT sunhao excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT shenguofang excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy
AT zhangshilei excellentnavigationsystemandexperienceincraniomaxillofacialnavigationsurgeryadoublecenterstudy