Cargando…

Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to review accelerometer wear methods and correlations between accelerometry and physical activity questionnaire data, depending on participant characteristics. METHODS: We included 57 articles about physical activity measurement by accelerometry and questionnaire...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skender, Stephanie, Ose, Jennifer, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Paskow, Michael, Brühmann, Boris, Siegel, Erin M., Steindorf, Karen, Ulrich, Cornelia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27306667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0
_version_ 1782437979155857408
author Skender, Stephanie
Ose, Jennifer
Chang-Claude, Jenny
Paskow, Michael
Brühmann, Boris
Siegel, Erin M.
Steindorf, Karen
Ulrich, Cornelia M.
author_facet Skender, Stephanie
Ose, Jennifer
Chang-Claude, Jenny
Paskow, Michael
Brühmann, Boris
Siegel, Erin M.
Steindorf, Karen
Ulrich, Cornelia M.
author_sort Skender, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to review accelerometer wear methods and correlations between accelerometry and physical activity questionnaire data, depending on participant characteristics. METHODS: We included 57 articles about physical activity measurement by accelerometry and questionnaires. Criteria were to have at least 100 participants of at least 18 years of age with manuscripts available in English. Accelerometer wear methods were compared. Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients between questionnaires and accelerometers and differences between genders, age categories, and body mass index (BMI) categories were assessed. RESULTS: In most investigations, requested wear time was seven days during waking hours and devices were mostly attached on hips with waist belts. A minimum of four valid days with wear time of at least ten hours per day was required in most studies. Correlations (r = Pearson, ρ = Spearman) of total questionnaire scores against accelerometer measures across individual studies ranged from r = 0.08 to ρ = 0.58 (P < 0.001) for men and from r = −0.02 to r = 0.49 (P < 0.01) for women. Correlations for total physical activity among participants with ages ≤65 ranged from r = 0.04 to ρ = 0.47 (P < 0.001) and from r = 0.16 (P = 0.02) to r = 0.53 (P < 0.01) among the elderly (≥65 years). Few studies investigated stratification by BMI, with varying cut points and inconsistent results. CONCLUSION: Accelerometers appear to provide slightly more consistent results in relation to self-reported physical activity among men. Nevertheless, due to overall limited consistency, different aspects measured by each method, and differences in the dimensions studied, it is advised that studies use both questionnaires and accelerometers to gain the most complete physical activity information. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4910242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49102422016-06-17 Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review Skender, Stephanie Ose, Jennifer Chang-Claude, Jenny Paskow, Michael Brühmann, Boris Siegel, Erin M. Steindorf, Karen Ulrich, Cornelia M. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to review accelerometer wear methods and correlations between accelerometry and physical activity questionnaire data, depending on participant characteristics. METHODS: We included 57 articles about physical activity measurement by accelerometry and questionnaires. Criteria were to have at least 100 participants of at least 18 years of age with manuscripts available in English. Accelerometer wear methods were compared. Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients between questionnaires and accelerometers and differences between genders, age categories, and body mass index (BMI) categories were assessed. RESULTS: In most investigations, requested wear time was seven days during waking hours and devices were mostly attached on hips with waist belts. A minimum of four valid days with wear time of at least ten hours per day was required in most studies. Correlations (r = Pearson, ρ = Spearman) of total questionnaire scores against accelerometer measures across individual studies ranged from r = 0.08 to ρ = 0.58 (P < 0.001) for men and from r = −0.02 to r = 0.49 (P < 0.01) for women. Correlations for total physical activity among participants with ages ≤65 ranged from r = 0.04 to ρ = 0.47 (P < 0.001) and from r = 0.16 (P = 0.02) to r = 0.53 (P < 0.01) among the elderly (≥65 years). Few studies investigated stratification by BMI, with varying cut points and inconsistent results. CONCLUSION: Accelerometers appear to provide slightly more consistent results in relation to self-reported physical activity among men. Nevertheless, due to overall limited consistency, different aspects measured by each method, and differences in the dimensions studied, it is advised that studies use both questionnaires and accelerometers to gain the most complete physical activity information. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4910242/ /pubmed/27306667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Skender, Stephanie
Ose, Jennifer
Chang-Claude, Jenny
Paskow, Michael
Brühmann, Boris
Siegel, Erin M.
Steindorf, Karen
Ulrich, Cornelia M.
Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review
title Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review
title_full Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review
title_fullStr Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review
title_short Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review
title_sort accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27306667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0
work_keys_str_mv AT skenderstephanie accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview
AT osejennifer accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview
AT changclaudejenny accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview
AT paskowmichael accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview
AT bruhmannboris accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview
AT siegelerinm accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview
AT steindorfkaren accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview
AT ulrichcorneliam accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview