Cargando…
Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to review accelerometer wear methods and correlations between accelerometry and physical activity questionnaire data, depending on participant characteristics. METHODS: We included 57 articles about physical activity measurement by accelerometry and questionnaire...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27306667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0 |
_version_ | 1782437979155857408 |
---|---|
author | Skender, Stephanie Ose, Jennifer Chang-Claude, Jenny Paskow, Michael Brühmann, Boris Siegel, Erin M. Steindorf, Karen Ulrich, Cornelia M. |
author_facet | Skender, Stephanie Ose, Jennifer Chang-Claude, Jenny Paskow, Michael Brühmann, Boris Siegel, Erin M. Steindorf, Karen Ulrich, Cornelia M. |
author_sort | Skender, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to review accelerometer wear methods and correlations between accelerometry and physical activity questionnaire data, depending on participant characteristics. METHODS: We included 57 articles about physical activity measurement by accelerometry and questionnaires. Criteria were to have at least 100 participants of at least 18 years of age with manuscripts available in English. Accelerometer wear methods were compared. Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients between questionnaires and accelerometers and differences between genders, age categories, and body mass index (BMI) categories were assessed. RESULTS: In most investigations, requested wear time was seven days during waking hours and devices were mostly attached on hips with waist belts. A minimum of four valid days with wear time of at least ten hours per day was required in most studies. Correlations (r = Pearson, ρ = Spearman) of total questionnaire scores against accelerometer measures across individual studies ranged from r = 0.08 to ρ = 0.58 (P < 0.001) for men and from r = −0.02 to r = 0.49 (P < 0.01) for women. Correlations for total physical activity among participants with ages ≤65 ranged from r = 0.04 to ρ = 0.47 (P < 0.001) and from r = 0.16 (P = 0.02) to r = 0.53 (P < 0.01) among the elderly (≥65 years). Few studies investigated stratification by BMI, with varying cut points and inconsistent results. CONCLUSION: Accelerometers appear to provide slightly more consistent results in relation to self-reported physical activity among men. Nevertheless, due to overall limited consistency, different aspects measured by each method, and differences in the dimensions studied, it is advised that studies use both questionnaires and accelerometers to gain the most complete physical activity information. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4910242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49102422016-06-17 Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review Skender, Stephanie Ose, Jennifer Chang-Claude, Jenny Paskow, Michael Brühmann, Boris Siegel, Erin M. Steindorf, Karen Ulrich, Cornelia M. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to review accelerometer wear methods and correlations between accelerometry and physical activity questionnaire data, depending on participant characteristics. METHODS: We included 57 articles about physical activity measurement by accelerometry and questionnaires. Criteria were to have at least 100 participants of at least 18 years of age with manuscripts available in English. Accelerometer wear methods were compared. Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients between questionnaires and accelerometers and differences between genders, age categories, and body mass index (BMI) categories were assessed. RESULTS: In most investigations, requested wear time was seven days during waking hours and devices were mostly attached on hips with waist belts. A minimum of four valid days with wear time of at least ten hours per day was required in most studies. Correlations (r = Pearson, ρ = Spearman) of total questionnaire scores against accelerometer measures across individual studies ranged from r = 0.08 to ρ = 0.58 (P < 0.001) for men and from r = −0.02 to r = 0.49 (P < 0.01) for women. Correlations for total physical activity among participants with ages ≤65 ranged from r = 0.04 to ρ = 0.47 (P < 0.001) and from r = 0.16 (P = 0.02) to r = 0.53 (P < 0.01) among the elderly (≥65 years). Few studies investigated stratification by BMI, with varying cut points and inconsistent results. CONCLUSION: Accelerometers appear to provide slightly more consistent results in relation to self-reported physical activity among men. Nevertheless, due to overall limited consistency, different aspects measured by each method, and differences in the dimensions studied, it is advised that studies use both questionnaires and accelerometers to gain the most complete physical activity information. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4910242/ /pubmed/27306667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Skender, Stephanie Ose, Jennifer Chang-Claude, Jenny Paskow, Michael Brühmann, Boris Siegel, Erin M. Steindorf, Karen Ulrich, Cornelia M. Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review |
title | Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review |
title_full | Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review |
title_short | Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review |
title_sort | accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27306667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skenderstephanie accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview AT osejennifer accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview AT changclaudejenny accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview AT paskowmichael accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview AT bruhmannboris accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview AT siegelerinm accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview AT steindorfkaren accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview AT ulrichcorneliam accelerometryandphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview |