Cargando…

Crowdsourcing the Measurement of Interstate Conflict

Much of the data used to measure conflict is extracted from news reports. This is typically accomplished using either expert coders to quantify the relevant information or machine coders to automatically extract data from documents. Although expert coding is costly, it produces quality data. Machine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Orazio, Vito, Kenwick, Michael, Lane, Matthew, Palmer, Glenn, Reitter, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27310427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156527
_version_ 1782438096301719552
author D’Orazio, Vito
Kenwick, Michael
Lane, Matthew
Palmer, Glenn
Reitter, David
author_facet D’Orazio, Vito
Kenwick, Michael
Lane, Matthew
Palmer, Glenn
Reitter, David
author_sort D’Orazio, Vito
collection PubMed
description Much of the data used to measure conflict is extracted from news reports. This is typically accomplished using either expert coders to quantify the relevant information or machine coders to automatically extract data from documents. Although expert coding is costly, it produces quality data. Machine coding is fast and inexpensive, but the data are noisy. To diminish the severity of this tradeoff, we introduce a method for analyzing news documents that uses crowdsourcing, supplemented with computational approaches. The new method is tested on documents about Militarized Interstate Disputes, and its accuracy ranges between about 68 and 76 percent. This is shown to be a considerable improvement over automated coding, and to cost less and be much faster than expert coding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4911154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49111542016-07-06 Crowdsourcing the Measurement of Interstate Conflict D’Orazio, Vito Kenwick, Michael Lane, Matthew Palmer, Glenn Reitter, David PLoS One Research Article Much of the data used to measure conflict is extracted from news reports. This is typically accomplished using either expert coders to quantify the relevant information or machine coders to automatically extract data from documents. Although expert coding is costly, it produces quality data. Machine coding is fast and inexpensive, but the data are noisy. To diminish the severity of this tradeoff, we introduce a method for analyzing news documents that uses crowdsourcing, supplemented with computational approaches. The new method is tested on documents about Militarized Interstate Disputes, and its accuracy ranges between about 68 and 76 percent. This is shown to be a considerable improvement over automated coding, and to cost less and be much faster than expert coding. Public Library of Science 2016-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4911154/ /pubmed/27310427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156527 Text en © 2016 D’Orazio et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
D’Orazio, Vito
Kenwick, Michael
Lane, Matthew
Palmer, Glenn
Reitter, David
Crowdsourcing the Measurement of Interstate Conflict
title Crowdsourcing the Measurement of Interstate Conflict
title_full Crowdsourcing the Measurement of Interstate Conflict
title_fullStr Crowdsourcing the Measurement of Interstate Conflict
title_full_unstemmed Crowdsourcing the Measurement of Interstate Conflict
title_short Crowdsourcing the Measurement of Interstate Conflict
title_sort crowdsourcing the measurement of interstate conflict
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27310427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156527
work_keys_str_mv AT doraziovito crowdsourcingthemeasurementofinterstateconflict
AT kenwickmichael crowdsourcingthemeasurementofinterstateconflict
AT lanematthew crowdsourcingthemeasurementofinterstateconflict
AT palmerglenn crowdsourcingthemeasurementofinterstateconflict
AT reitterdavid crowdsourcingthemeasurementofinterstateconflict