Cargando…

An Empiric HIV Risk Scoring Tool to Predict HIV-1 Acquisition in African Women

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an HIV risk assessment tool to predict HIV acquisition among African women. DESIGN: Data were analyzed from 3 randomized trials of biomedical HIV prevention interventions among African women (VOICE, HPTN 035, and FEM-PrEP). METHODS: We implemented standard methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balkus, Jennifer E., Brown, Elizabeth, Palanee, Thesla, Nair, Gonasagrie, Gafoor, Zakir, Zhang, Jingyang, Richardson, Barbra A., Chirenje, Zvavahera M., Marrazzo, Jeanne M., Baeten, Jared M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000974
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an HIV risk assessment tool to predict HIV acquisition among African women. DESIGN: Data were analyzed from 3 randomized trials of biomedical HIV prevention interventions among African women (VOICE, HPTN 035, and FEM-PrEP). METHODS: We implemented standard methods for the development of clinical prediction rules to generate a risk-scoring tool to predict HIV acquisition over the course of 1 year. Performance of the score was assessed through internal and external validations. RESULTS: The final risk score resulting from multivariable modeling included age, married/living with a partner, partner provides financial or material support, partner has other partners, alcohol use, detection of a curable sexually transmitted infection, and herpes simplex virus 2 serostatus. Point values for each factor ranged from 0 to 2, with a maximum possible total score of 11. Scores ≥5 were associated with HIV incidence >5 per 100 person-years and identified 91% of incident HIV infections from among only 64% of women. The area under the curve (AUC) for predictive ability of the score was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68 to 0.74), indicating good predictive ability. Risk score performance was generally similar with internal cross-validation (AUC = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.73) and external validation in HPTN 035 (AUC = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.75) and FEM-PrEP (AUC = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: A discrete set of characteristics that can be easily assessed in clinical and research settings was predictive of HIV acquisition over 1 year. The use of a validated risk score could improve efficiency of recruitment into HIV prevention research and inform scale-up of HIV prevention strategies in women at highest risk.