Cargando…
Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study
PURPOSE: To assess the response time associated with visual performance (VP) tasks in the presence of defocus in different presbyopic populations. METHODS: 58 eyes between the ages of 35 and 50 years were studied. Subjects were categorized as pre-presbyopic (35–39 years), early-presbyopic (40–45 yea...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.11.001 |
_version_ | 1782438129482858496 |
---|---|
author | Vasudevan, Balamurali Sultani, Kaiser Cossette, Christopher Burr, Brandon |
author_facet | Vasudevan, Balamurali Sultani, Kaiser Cossette, Christopher Burr, Brandon |
author_sort | Vasudevan, Balamurali |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the response time associated with visual performance (VP) tasks in the presence of defocus in different presbyopic populations. METHODS: 58 eyes between the ages of 35 and 50 years were studied. Subjects were categorized as pre-presbyopic (35–39 years), early-presbyopic (40–45 years), and mid-presbyopic (46–50 years). VP measurements obtained monocularly included distance and near high contrast (HC) and low contrast (LC) optotype recognition, and contrast threshold at 12 cpd for different defocus magnitudes between 0D and 3D in 1D steps. Response time defined as the time taken to recognize and verbalize an optotype, was compared among different presbyopic age groups. RESULTS: From 58 eyes, mean (SD) response time for high contrast distance visual acuity for 0D through 3D ranged between 1.48 (0.23) and 1.87 (0.31) s, whereas low contrast distance visual acuity ranged between 1.5 (0.22) and 2.09 (0.49) s. Mean response time for high contrast near visual acuity for 0D through 3D ranged between 1.56 (0.19) and 2.23 (0.45) s. However, for low contrast near visual acuity it ranged between 1.75 (0.32) and 2.71 (0.94) s. Mean (SD) response time for 12 cpd ranged between 2.11 (0.50) and 5.72 (1.09) s. ANOVA revealed a significant difference in response time for distance, near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity as a function of defocus for different age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Response time is increased in the presence of increasing defocus for both distance and near visual acuity and could impact on performance for critical tasks. Full correction of visual acuity at distance and near in presbyopes is warranted always. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4911444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49114442016-06-27 Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study Vasudevan, Balamurali Sultani, Kaiser Cossette, Christopher Burr, Brandon J Optom Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the response time associated with visual performance (VP) tasks in the presence of defocus in different presbyopic populations. METHODS: 58 eyes between the ages of 35 and 50 years were studied. Subjects were categorized as pre-presbyopic (35–39 years), early-presbyopic (40–45 years), and mid-presbyopic (46–50 years). VP measurements obtained monocularly included distance and near high contrast (HC) and low contrast (LC) optotype recognition, and contrast threshold at 12 cpd for different defocus magnitudes between 0D and 3D in 1D steps. Response time defined as the time taken to recognize and verbalize an optotype, was compared among different presbyopic age groups. RESULTS: From 58 eyes, mean (SD) response time for high contrast distance visual acuity for 0D through 3D ranged between 1.48 (0.23) and 1.87 (0.31) s, whereas low contrast distance visual acuity ranged between 1.5 (0.22) and 2.09 (0.49) s. Mean response time for high contrast near visual acuity for 0D through 3D ranged between 1.56 (0.19) and 2.23 (0.45) s. However, for low contrast near visual acuity it ranged between 1.75 (0.32) and 2.71 (0.94) s. Mean (SD) response time for 12 cpd ranged between 2.11 (0.50) and 5.72 (1.09) s. ANOVA revealed a significant difference in response time for distance, near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity as a function of defocus for different age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Response time is increased in the presence of increasing defocus for both distance and near visual acuity and could impact on performance for critical tasks. Full correction of visual acuity at distance and near in presbyopes is warranted always. Elsevier 2016 2015-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4911444/ /pubmed/26749188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.11.001 Text en © 2015 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espa˜na, S.L.U. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vasudevan, Balamurali Sultani, Kaiser Cossette, Christopher Burr, Brandon Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study |
title | Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study |
title_full | Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study |
title_short | Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study |
title_sort | effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vasudevanbalamurali effectofdefocusonresponsetimeindifferentagegroupsapilotstudy AT sultanikaiser effectofdefocusonresponsetimeindifferentagegroupsapilotstudy AT cossettechristopher effectofdefocusonresponsetimeindifferentagegroupsapilotstudy AT burrbrandon effectofdefocusonresponsetimeindifferentagegroupsapilotstudy |