Cargando…

Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study

PURPOSE: To assess the response time associated with visual performance (VP) tasks in the presence of defocus in different presbyopic populations. METHODS: 58 eyes between the ages of 35 and 50 years were studied. Subjects were categorized as pre-presbyopic (35–39 years), early-presbyopic (40–45 yea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasudevan, Balamurali, Sultani, Kaiser, Cossette, Christopher, Burr, Brandon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.11.001
_version_ 1782438129482858496
author Vasudevan, Balamurali
Sultani, Kaiser
Cossette, Christopher
Burr, Brandon
author_facet Vasudevan, Balamurali
Sultani, Kaiser
Cossette, Christopher
Burr, Brandon
author_sort Vasudevan, Balamurali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the response time associated with visual performance (VP) tasks in the presence of defocus in different presbyopic populations. METHODS: 58 eyes between the ages of 35 and 50 years were studied. Subjects were categorized as pre-presbyopic (35–39 years), early-presbyopic (40–45 years), and mid-presbyopic (46–50 years). VP measurements obtained monocularly included distance and near high contrast (HC) and low contrast (LC) optotype recognition, and contrast threshold at 12 cpd for different defocus magnitudes between 0D and 3D in 1D steps. Response time defined as the time taken to recognize and verbalize an optotype, was compared among different presbyopic age groups. RESULTS: From 58 eyes, mean (SD) response time for high contrast distance visual acuity for 0D through 3D ranged between 1.48 (0.23) and 1.87 (0.31) s, whereas low contrast distance visual acuity ranged between 1.5 (0.22) and 2.09 (0.49) s. Mean response time for high contrast near visual acuity for 0D through 3D ranged between 1.56 (0.19) and 2.23 (0.45) s. However, for low contrast near visual acuity it ranged between 1.75 (0.32) and 2.71 (0.94) s. Mean (SD) response time for 12 cpd ranged between 2.11 (0.50) and 5.72 (1.09) s. ANOVA revealed a significant difference in response time for distance, near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity as a function of defocus for different age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Response time is increased in the presence of increasing defocus for both distance and near visual acuity and could impact on performance for critical tasks. Full correction of visual acuity at distance and near in presbyopes is warranted always.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4911444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49114442016-06-27 Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study Vasudevan, Balamurali Sultani, Kaiser Cossette, Christopher Burr, Brandon J Optom Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the response time associated with visual performance (VP) tasks in the presence of defocus in different presbyopic populations. METHODS: 58 eyes between the ages of 35 and 50 years were studied. Subjects were categorized as pre-presbyopic (35–39 years), early-presbyopic (40–45 years), and mid-presbyopic (46–50 years). VP measurements obtained monocularly included distance and near high contrast (HC) and low contrast (LC) optotype recognition, and contrast threshold at 12 cpd for different defocus magnitudes between 0D and 3D in 1D steps. Response time defined as the time taken to recognize and verbalize an optotype, was compared among different presbyopic age groups. RESULTS: From 58 eyes, mean (SD) response time for high contrast distance visual acuity for 0D through 3D ranged between 1.48 (0.23) and 1.87 (0.31) s, whereas low contrast distance visual acuity ranged between 1.5 (0.22) and 2.09 (0.49) s. Mean response time for high contrast near visual acuity for 0D through 3D ranged between 1.56 (0.19) and 2.23 (0.45) s. However, for low contrast near visual acuity it ranged between 1.75 (0.32) and 2.71 (0.94) s. Mean (SD) response time for 12 cpd ranged between 2.11 (0.50) and 5.72 (1.09) s. ANOVA revealed a significant difference in response time for distance, near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity as a function of defocus for different age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Response time is increased in the presence of increasing defocus for both distance and near visual acuity and could impact on performance for critical tasks. Full correction of visual acuity at distance and near in presbyopes is warranted always. Elsevier 2016 2015-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4911444/ /pubmed/26749188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.11.001 Text en © 2015 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espa˜na, S.L.U. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Vasudevan, Balamurali
Sultani, Kaiser
Cossette, Christopher
Burr, Brandon
Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study
title Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study
title_full Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study
title_fullStr Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study
title_short Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study
title_sort effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT vasudevanbalamurali effectofdefocusonresponsetimeindifferentagegroupsapilotstudy
AT sultanikaiser effectofdefocusonresponsetimeindifferentagegroupsapilotstudy
AT cossettechristopher effectofdefocusonresponsetimeindifferentagegroupsapilotstudy
AT burrbrandon effectofdefocusonresponsetimeindifferentagegroupsapilotstudy