Cargando…
Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis
INTRODUCTION: Despite tobacco control and health promotion efforts, the incidence rates of mouth cancer are increasing across most regions in India. Analysing the influence of age, time period and birth cohort on these secular trends can point towards underlying factors and help identify high-risk p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27043865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.03.007 |
_version_ | 1782438155513757696 |
---|---|
author | Shridhar, Krithiga Rajaraman, Preetha Koyande, Shravani Parikh, Purvish M. Chaturvedi, Pankaj Dhillon, Preet K. Dikshit, Rajesh P. |
author_facet | Shridhar, Krithiga Rajaraman, Preetha Koyande, Shravani Parikh, Purvish M. Chaturvedi, Pankaj Dhillon, Preet K. Dikshit, Rajesh P. |
author_sort | Shridhar, Krithiga |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite tobacco control and health promotion efforts, the incidence rates of mouth cancer are increasing across most regions in India. Analysing the influence of age, time period and birth cohort on these secular trends can point towards underlying factors and help identify high-risk populations for improved cancer control programmes. METHODS: We evaluated secular changes in mouth cancer incidence among men and women aged 25–74 years in Mumbai between 1995 and 2009 by calculating age-specific and age-standardized incidence rates (ASR). We estimated the age-adjusted linear trend for annual percent change (EAPC) using the drift parameter, and conducted an age–period–cohort (APC) analysis to quantify recent time trends and to evaluate the significance of birth cohort and calendar period effects. RESULTS: Over the 15-year period, age-standardized incidence rates of mouth cancer in men in Mumbai increased by 2.7% annually (95% CI:1.9 to 3.4), p < 0.0001) while rates among women decreased (EAPC = −0.01% (95% CI:−0.02 to −0.002), p = 0.03). APC analysis revealed significant non-linear positive period and cohort effects in men, with higher effects among younger men (25–49 years). Non-significant increasing trends were observed in younger women (25–49 years). CONCLUSIONS: APC analyses from the Mumbai cancer registry indicate a significant linear increase of mouth cancer incidence from 1995 to 2009 in men, which was driven by younger men aged 25–49 years, and a non-significant upward trend in similarly aged younger women. Health promotion efforts should more effectively target younger cohorts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4911594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49115942016-06-26 Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis Shridhar, Krithiga Rajaraman, Preetha Koyande, Shravani Parikh, Purvish M. Chaturvedi, Pankaj Dhillon, Preet K. Dikshit, Rajesh P. Cancer Epidemiol Article INTRODUCTION: Despite tobacco control and health promotion efforts, the incidence rates of mouth cancer are increasing across most regions in India. Analysing the influence of age, time period and birth cohort on these secular trends can point towards underlying factors and help identify high-risk populations for improved cancer control programmes. METHODS: We evaluated secular changes in mouth cancer incidence among men and women aged 25–74 years in Mumbai between 1995 and 2009 by calculating age-specific and age-standardized incidence rates (ASR). We estimated the age-adjusted linear trend for annual percent change (EAPC) using the drift parameter, and conducted an age–period–cohort (APC) analysis to quantify recent time trends and to evaluate the significance of birth cohort and calendar period effects. RESULTS: Over the 15-year period, age-standardized incidence rates of mouth cancer in men in Mumbai increased by 2.7% annually (95% CI:1.9 to 3.4), p < 0.0001) while rates among women decreased (EAPC = −0.01% (95% CI:−0.02 to −0.002), p = 0.03). APC analysis revealed significant non-linear positive period and cohort effects in men, with higher effects among younger men (25–49 years). Non-significant increasing trends were observed in younger women (25–49 years). CONCLUSIONS: APC analyses from the Mumbai cancer registry indicate a significant linear increase of mouth cancer incidence from 1995 to 2009 in men, which was driven by younger men aged 25–49 years, and a non-significant upward trend in similarly aged younger women. Health promotion efforts should more effectively target younger cohorts. Elsevier 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4911594/ /pubmed/27043865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.03.007 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shridhar, Krithiga Rajaraman, Preetha Koyande, Shravani Parikh, Purvish M. Chaturvedi, Pankaj Dhillon, Preet K. Dikshit, Rajesh P. Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis |
title | Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis |
title_full | Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis |
title_fullStr | Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis |
title_short | Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis |
title_sort | trends in mouth cancer incidence in mumbai, india (1995–2009): an age-period-cohort analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27043865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.03.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shridharkrithiga trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis AT rajaramanpreetha trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis AT koyandeshravani trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis AT parikhpurvishm trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis AT chaturvedipankaj trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis AT dhillonpreetk trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis AT dikshitrajeshp trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis |