Cargando…

Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION: Despite tobacco control and health promotion efforts, the incidence rates of mouth cancer are increasing across most regions in India. Analysing the influence of age, time period and birth cohort on these secular trends can point towards underlying factors and help identify high-risk p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shridhar, Krithiga, Rajaraman, Preetha, Koyande, Shravani, Parikh, Purvish M., Chaturvedi, Pankaj, Dhillon, Preet K., Dikshit, Rajesh P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27043865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.03.007
_version_ 1782438155513757696
author Shridhar, Krithiga
Rajaraman, Preetha
Koyande, Shravani
Parikh, Purvish M.
Chaturvedi, Pankaj
Dhillon, Preet K.
Dikshit, Rajesh P.
author_facet Shridhar, Krithiga
Rajaraman, Preetha
Koyande, Shravani
Parikh, Purvish M.
Chaturvedi, Pankaj
Dhillon, Preet K.
Dikshit, Rajesh P.
author_sort Shridhar, Krithiga
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite tobacco control and health promotion efforts, the incidence rates of mouth cancer are increasing across most regions in India. Analysing the influence of age, time period and birth cohort on these secular trends can point towards underlying factors and help identify high-risk populations for improved cancer control programmes. METHODS: We evaluated secular changes in mouth cancer incidence among men and women aged 25–74 years in Mumbai between 1995 and 2009 by calculating age-specific and age-standardized incidence rates (ASR). We estimated the age-adjusted linear trend for annual percent change (EAPC) using the drift parameter, and conducted an age–period–cohort (APC) analysis to quantify recent time trends and to evaluate the significance of birth cohort and calendar period effects. RESULTS: Over the 15-year period, age-standardized incidence rates of mouth cancer in men in Mumbai increased by 2.7% annually (95% CI:1.9 to 3.4), p < 0.0001) while rates among women decreased (EAPC = −0.01% (95% CI:−0.02 to −0.002), p = 0.03). APC analysis revealed significant non-linear positive period and cohort effects in men, with higher effects among younger men (25–49 years). Non-significant increasing trends were observed in younger women (25–49 years). CONCLUSIONS: APC analyses from the Mumbai cancer registry indicate a significant linear increase of mouth cancer incidence from 1995 to 2009 in men, which was driven by younger men aged 25–49 years, and a non-significant upward trend in similarly aged younger women. Health promotion efforts should more effectively target younger cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4911594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49115942016-06-26 Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis Shridhar, Krithiga Rajaraman, Preetha Koyande, Shravani Parikh, Purvish M. Chaturvedi, Pankaj Dhillon, Preet K. Dikshit, Rajesh P. Cancer Epidemiol Article INTRODUCTION: Despite tobacco control and health promotion efforts, the incidence rates of mouth cancer are increasing across most regions in India. Analysing the influence of age, time period and birth cohort on these secular trends can point towards underlying factors and help identify high-risk populations for improved cancer control programmes. METHODS: We evaluated secular changes in mouth cancer incidence among men and women aged 25–74 years in Mumbai between 1995 and 2009 by calculating age-specific and age-standardized incidence rates (ASR). We estimated the age-adjusted linear trend for annual percent change (EAPC) using the drift parameter, and conducted an age–period–cohort (APC) analysis to quantify recent time trends and to evaluate the significance of birth cohort and calendar period effects. RESULTS: Over the 15-year period, age-standardized incidence rates of mouth cancer in men in Mumbai increased by 2.7% annually (95% CI:1.9 to 3.4), p < 0.0001) while rates among women decreased (EAPC = −0.01% (95% CI:−0.02 to −0.002), p = 0.03). APC analysis revealed significant non-linear positive period and cohort effects in men, with higher effects among younger men (25–49 years). Non-significant increasing trends were observed in younger women (25–49 years). CONCLUSIONS: APC analyses from the Mumbai cancer registry indicate a significant linear increase of mouth cancer incidence from 1995 to 2009 in men, which was driven by younger men aged 25–49 years, and a non-significant upward trend in similarly aged younger women. Health promotion efforts should more effectively target younger cohorts. Elsevier 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4911594/ /pubmed/27043865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.03.007 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shridhar, Krithiga
Rajaraman, Preetha
Koyande, Shravani
Parikh, Purvish M.
Chaturvedi, Pankaj
Dhillon, Preet K.
Dikshit, Rajesh P.
Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis
title Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis
title_full Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis
title_fullStr Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis
title_short Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995–2009): An age-period-cohort analysis
title_sort trends in mouth cancer incidence in mumbai, india (1995–2009): an age-period-cohort analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27043865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.03.007
work_keys_str_mv AT shridharkrithiga trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT rajaramanpreetha trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT koyandeshravani trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT parikhpurvishm trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT chaturvedipankaj trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT dhillonpreetk trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT dikshitrajeshp trendsinmouthcancerincidenceinmumbaiindia19952009anageperiodcohortanalysis