Cargando…
Prevalence of Myopia in France: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
Refractive error (RE), particularly myopia, is the first cause of visual impairment throughout the world. This study aimed to depict the prevalence of myopia in a multicentric series of French individuals. This cross-sectional analysis was carried out between January 2012 and November 2013 in eye cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001976 |
_version_ | 1782438240043663360 |
---|---|
author | Matamoros, Emilie Ingrand, Pierre Pelen, François Bentaleb, Yacine Weber, Michel Korobelnik, Jean-François Souied, Eric Leveziel, Nicolas |
author_facet | Matamoros, Emilie Ingrand, Pierre Pelen, François Bentaleb, Yacine Weber, Michel Korobelnik, Jean-François Souied, Eric Leveziel, Nicolas |
author_sort | Matamoros, Emilie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Refractive error (RE), particularly myopia, is the first cause of visual impairment throughout the world. This study aimed to depict the prevalence of myopia in a multicentric series of French individuals. This cross-sectional analysis was carried out between January 2012 and November 2013 in eye clinics dedicated to REs. Data collection included age, gender, best-corrected visual acuity, RE, and any relevant medical history involving laser refractive surgery and cataract surgery. Exclusion criteria consisted of monophthalm patients or those with incomplete demographic data. Prevalences in the overall population, by gender and by age groups were reported for mild myopia (−0.50 to −2.75 diopter [D]), moderate myopia (−3 to −5.75 D), high myopia (less than −6 D), and very high myopia (less than −10 D). The analysis included 100,429 individuals, mean age 38.5 years (± 16.9). Overall prevalence of myopia was 39.1% (95% CI 38.8-39.4). Prevalences of mild, moderate, high and very high myopia were respectively 25.1% (95% CI 25.4-24.9), 10.6% (95% CI 10.4-10.8), 3.4% (95% CI 3.3-3.5) and 0.5% (95% CI 0.48-0.57). Even if possible bias occurred in recruitment, our results are similar to RE data collected in nationally representative samples of Caucasians in other studies. This is to our knowledge, one of the largest European series of individuals dedicated to myopia prevalences in different age groups. These results confirm the importance of myopia as a major health issue in Western countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4912270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49122702016-06-28 Prevalence of Myopia in France: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Matamoros, Emilie Ingrand, Pierre Pelen, François Bentaleb, Yacine Weber, Michel Korobelnik, Jean-François Souied, Eric Leveziel, Nicolas Medicine (Baltimore) 5800 Refractive error (RE), particularly myopia, is the first cause of visual impairment throughout the world. This study aimed to depict the prevalence of myopia in a multicentric series of French individuals. This cross-sectional analysis was carried out between January 2012 and November 2013 in eye clinics dedicated to REs. Data collection included age, gender, best-corrected visual acuity, RE, and any relevant medical history involving laser refractive surgery and cataract surgery. Exclusion criteria consisted of monophthalm patients or those with incomplete demographic data. Prevalences in the overall population, by gender and by age groups were reported for mild myopia (−0.50 to −2.75 diopter [D]), moderate myopia (−3 to −5.75 D), high myopia (less than −6 D), and very high myopia (less than −10 D). The analysis included 100,429 individuals, mean age 38.5 years (± 16.9). Overall prevalence of myopia was 39.1% (95% CI 38.8-39.4). Prevalences of mild, moderate, high and very high myopia were respectively 25.1% (95% CI 25.4-24.9), 10.6% (95% CI 10.4-10.8), 3.4% (95% CI 3.3-3.5) and 0.5% (95% CI 0.48-0.57). Even if possible bias occurred in recruitment, our results are similar to RE data collected in nationally representative samples of Caucasians in other studies. This is to our knowledge, one of the largest European series of individuals dedicated to myopia prevalences in different age groups. These results confirm the importance of myopia as a major health issue in Western countries. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4912270/ /pubmed/26559276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001976 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5800 Matamoros, Emilie Ingrand, Pierre Pelen, François Bentaleb, Yacine Weber, Michel Korobelnik, Jean-François Souied, Eric Leveziel, Nicolas Prevalence of Myopia in France: A Cross-Sectional Analysis |
title | Prevalence of Myopia in France: A Cross-Sectional Analysis |
title_full | Prevalence of Myopia in France: A Cross-Sectional Analysis |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Myopia in France: A Cross-Sectional Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Myopia in France: A Cross-Sectional Analysis |
title_short | Prevalence of Myopia in France: A Cross-Sectional Analysis |
title_sort | prevalence of myopia in france: a cross-sectional analysis |
topic | 5800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001976 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matamorosemilie prevalenceofmyopiainfranceacrosssectionalanalysis AT ingrandpierre prevalenceofmyopiainfranceacrosssectionalanalysis AT pelenfrancois prevalenceofmyopiainfranceacrosssectionalanalysis AT bentalebyacine prevalenceofmyopiainfranceacrosssectionalanalysis AT webermichel prevalenceofmyopiainfranceacrosssectionalanalysis AT korobelnikjeanfrancois prevalenceofmyopiainfranceacrosssectionalanalysis AT souiederic prevalenceofmyopiainfranceacrosssectionalanalysis AT levezielnicolas prevalenceofmyopiainfranceacrosssectionalanalysis |