Cargando…

Optimal injection rate of ultrasound contrast agent for evaluation of focal liver lesions using an automatic power injector: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal bolus injection rate of ultrasound (US) contrast agent in vascular imaging for focal liver lesions. METHODS: Thirteen patients with 13 focal liver lesions (5 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with cirrhosis, 4 liver metastases, 2 hemangiomas, 1 intrahepatic cholang...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugimoto, Katsutoshi, Moriyasu, Fuminori, Takeuchi, Hirohito, Kojima, Mayumi, Ogawa, Saori, Sano, Takatomo, Furuichi, Yoshihiro, Kobayashi, Yoshiyuki, Nakamura, Ikuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27386232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2364-5
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal bolus injection rate of ultrasound (US) contrast agent in vascular imaging for focal liver lesions. METHODS: Thirteen patients with 13 focal liver lesions (5 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with cirrhosis, 4 liver metastases, 2 hemangiomas, 1 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 1 focal nodular hyperplasia) received two bolus injections of Sonazoid (at 0.5 and 2.0 mL/s) using an automatic power injector. The lesion-to-liver contrast ratio at peak enhancement was quantitatively evaluated. Enhancement of the lesions compared to liver parenchyma was assessed by two independent readers using a five-point scale and qualitatively evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: For all lesions, the contrast ratio was not significantly different between the two injection rates. For HCCs, the contrast ratio was higher at 0.5 mL/s (7.41 ± 6.56) than at 2.0 mL/s (4.28 ± 4.66, p = 0.025). For all lesions, the mean area under the ROC curve (AUC) was not significantly different between the two injection rates. For HCCs, the AUC was greater at 0.5 mL/s than at 2.0 mL/s (AUC: 0.86, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: In contrast-enhanced US, an injection rate of 0.5 mL/s is superior to an injection rate of 2.0 mL/s for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of HCCs in the cirrhotic liver.