Cargando…

Cup implantation accuracy using the HipCOMPASS mechanical intraoperative support device

BACKGROUND: While navigation systems have been developed to increase implantation accuracy in total hip arthroplasty (THA), they are not yet sufficiently versatile or commonly used. Therefore, to elevate the appeal of such systems, we have developed HipCOMPASS, a simple and effective mechanical angl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suda, Ken, Ito, Tomoyuki, Miyasaka, Dai, Imai, Norio, Minato, Izumi, Endo, Naoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27386270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2503-z
_version_ 1782438274661351424
author Suda, Ken
Ito, Tomoyuki
Miyasaka, Dai
Imai, Norio
Minato, Izumi
Endo, Naoto
author_facet Suda, Ken
Ito, Tomoyuki
Miyasaka, Dai
Imai, Norio
Minato, Izumi
Endo, Naoto
author_sort Suda, Ken
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While navigation systems have been developed to increase implantation accuracy in total hip arthroplasty (THA), they are not yet sufficiently versatile or commonly used. Therefore, to elevate the appeal of such systems, we have developed HipCOMPASS, a simple and effective mechanical angle indicator for use in supine THA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: How accurate is the mean cup orientation [in terms of errors in radiographic anteversion (RA) and inclination (RI)] in cases where HipCOMPASS is used for intraoperative support? Does HipCOMPASS increase this cup orientation accuracy compared to THA cases without it? Does HipCOMPASS increase mean operation time? METHODS: We measured cup orientation in 97 THA cases with HipCOMPASS and in 80 cases without it. Then we compared the angles determined in preoperative planning with the angles revealed by postoperative computed tomography (CT) for both groups. The discrepancy between them was defined as an error. Errors greater than 10° were considered outliers. Additionally, mean operative time with and without the Hip COMPASS were compared. RESULTS: With the use of HipCOMPASS, the mean absolute error values in radiographic anteversion and inclination were 2.9° ± 2.3° (range 0°–12.8°) and 2.9° ± 2.1° (0.1°–7.7°), respectively. In contrast, without the use of HipCOMPASS, radiographic anteversion and inclination error values were 8.8° ± 5.8° (0.1°–25.4°) and 6.1° ± 4.5° (0.2°–21.0°), respectively. Outlier occurrence rates were 1.0 % with HipCOMPASS and 48.8 % without it. Mean operative times with and without HipCOMPASS use were 109.2 ± 23.8 min (74–199 min) and 137.6 ± 40.6 min (71–298 min), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study has found that HipCOMPASS dramatically increases implantation accuracy and it is also a simple and highly versatile tool that can be implemented quickly. Given its low cost in addition to its favourable accuracy, simple implementation, and short operative time, HipCOMPASS can be regarded as a very useful and effective THA support device. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4912536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49125362016-07-06 Cup implantation accuracy using the HipCOMPASS mechanical intraoperative support device Suda, Ken Ito, Tomoyuki Miyasaka, Dai Imai, Norio Minato, Izumi Endo, Naoto Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: While navigation systems have been developed to increase implantation accuracy in total hip arthroplasty (THA), they are not yet sufficiently versatile or commonly used. Therefore, to elevate the appeal of such systems, we have developed HipCOMPASS, a simple and effective mechanical angle indicator for use in supine THA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: How accurate is the mean cup orientation [in terms of errors in radiographic anteversion (RA) and inclination (RI)] in cases where HipCOMPASS is used for intraoperative support? Does HipCOMPASS increase this cup orientation accuracy compared to THA cases without it? Does HipCOMPASS increase mean operation time? METHODS: We measured cup orientation in 97 THA cases with HipCOMPASS and in 80 cases without it. Then we compared the angles determined in preoperative planning with the angles revealed by postoperative computed tomography (CT) for both groups. The discrepancy between them was defined as an error. Errors greater than 10° were considered outliers. Additionally, mean operative time with and without the Hip COMPASS were compared. RESULTS: With the use of HipCOMPASS, the mean absolute error values in radiographic anteversion and inclination were 2.9° ± 2.3° (range 0°–12.8°) and 2.9° ± 2.1° (0.1°–7.7°), respectively. In contrast, without the use of HipCOMPASS, radiographic anteversion and inclination error values were 8.8° ± 5.8° (0.1°–25.4°) and 6.1° ± 4.5° (0.2°–21.0°), respectively. Outlier occurrence rates were 1.0 % with HipCOMPASS and 48.8 % without it. Mean operative times with and without HipCOMPASS use were 109.2 ± 23.8 min (74–199 min) and 137.6 ± 40.6 min (71–298 min), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study has found that HipCOMPASS dramatically increases implantation accuracy and it is also a simple and highly versatile tool that can be implemented quickly. Given its low cost in addition to its favourable accuracy, simple implementation, and short operative time, HipCOMPASS can be regarded as a very useful and effective THA support device. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level 3. Springer International Publishing 2016-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4912536/ /pubmed/27386270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2503-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Suda, Ken
Ito, Tomoyuki
Miyasaka, Dai
Imai, Norio
Minato, Izumi
Endo, Naoto
Cup implantation accuracy using the HipCOMPASS mechanical intraoperative support device
title Cup implantation accuracy using the HipCOMPASS mechanical intraoperative support device
title_full Cup implantation accuracy using the HipCOMPASS mechanical intraoperative support device
title_fullStr Cup implantation accuracy using the HipCOMPASS mechanical intraoperative support device
title_full_unstemmed Cup implantation accuracy using the HipCOMPASS mechanical intraoperative support device
title_short Cup implantation accuracy using the HipCOMPASS mechanical intraoperative support device
title_sort cup implantation accuracy using the hipcompass mechanical intraoperative support device
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27386270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2503-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sudaken cupimplantationaccuracyusingthehipcompassmechanicalintraoperativesupportdevice
AT itotomoyuki cupimplantationaccuracyusingthehipcompassmechanicalintraoperativesupportdevice
AT miyasakadai cupimplantationaccuracyusingthehipcompassmechanicalintraoperativesupportdevice
AT imainorio cupimplantationaccuracyusingthehipcompassmechanicalintraoperativesupportdevice
AT minatoizumi cupimplantationaccuracyusingthehipcompassmechanicalintraoperativesupportdevice
AT endonaoto cupimplantationaccuracyusingthehipcompassmechanicalintraoperativesupportdevice