Cargando…
Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize
Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) provides a framework for judging the ethical qualities of innovation processes, however guidance for researchers on how to implement such practices is limited. Exploring RRI in the context of nanotechnology, this paper examines how the dispersed and interdis...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9718-1 |
_version_ | 1782438281186639872 |
---|---|
author | Spruit, Shannon L. Hoople, Gordon D. Rolfe, David A. |
author_facet | Spruit, Shannon L. Hoople, Gordon D. Rolfe, David A. |
author_sort | Spruit, Shannon L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) provides a framework for judging the ethical qualities of innovation processes, however guidance for researchers on how to implement such practices is limited. Exploring RRI in the context of nanotechnology, this paper examines how the dispersed and interdisciplinary nature of the nanotechnology field somewhat hampers the abilities of individual researchers to control the innovation process. The ad-hoc nature of the field of nanotechnology, with its fluid boundaries and elusive membership, has thus far failed to establish a strong collective agent, such as a professional organization, through which researchers could collectively steer technological development in light of social and environmental needs. In this case, individual researchers cannot innovate responsibly purely by themselves, but there is also no structural framework to ensure that responsible development of nanotechnologies takes place. We argue that, in such a case, individual researchers have a duty to collectivize. In short, researchers in situations where it is challenging for individual agents to achieve the goals of RRI are compelled to develop organizations to facilitate RRI. In this paper we establish and discuss the criteria under which individual researchers have this duty to collectivize. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4912580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49125802016-07-06 Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize Spruit, Shannon L. Hoople, Gordon D. Rolfe, David A. Sci Eng Ethics Original Paper Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) provides a framework for judging the ethical qualities of innovation processes, however guidance for researchers on how to implement such practices is limited. Exploring RRI in the context of nanotechnology, this paper examines how the dispersed and interdisciplinary nature of the nanotechnology field somewhat hampers the abilities of individual researchers to control the innovation process. The ad-hoc nature of the field of nanotechnology, with its fluid boundaries and elusive membership, has thus far failed to establish a strong collective agent, such as a professional organization, through which researchers could collectively steer technological development in light of social and environmental needs. In this case, individual researchers cannot innovate responsibly purely by themselves, but there is also no structural framework to ensure that responsible development of nanotechnologies takes place. We argue that, in such a case, individual researchers have a duty to collectivize. In short, researchers in situations where it is challenging for individual agents to achieve the goals of RRI are compelled to develop organizations to facilitate RRI. In this paper we establish and discuss the criteria under which individual researchers have this duty to collectivize. Springer Netherlands 2015-11-04 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4912580/ /pubmed/26538353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9718-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Spruit, Shannon L. Hoople, Gordon D. Rolfe, David A. Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize |
title | Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize |
title_full | Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize |
title_fullStr | Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize |
title_full_unstemmed | Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize |
title_short | Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize |
title_sort | just a cog in the machine? the individual responsibility of researchers in nanotechnology is a duty to collectivize |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9718-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spruitshannonl justacoginthemachinetheindividualresponsibilityofresearchersinnanotechnologyisadutytocollectivize AT hooplegordond justacoginthemachinetheindividualresponsibilityofresearchersinnanotechnologyisadutytocollectivize AT rolfedavida justacoginthemachinetheindividualresponsibilityofresearchersinnanotechnologyisadutytocollectivize |