Cargando…

Evaluation of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against Anopheles arabiensis when administered to Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) under field conditions

BACKGROUND: Although vector control strategies, such as insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) have been effective in Kenya the transmission of malaria continues to afflict western Kenya. This residual transmission is driven in part by Anopheles arabiensis, known for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lozano-Fuentes, Saul, Kading, Rebekah C., Hartman, Daniel A., Okoth, Edward, Githaka, Naftaly, Nene, Vishvanath, Poché, Richard M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27317557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1361-z
_version_ 1782438325337980928
author Lozano-Fuentes, Saul
Kading, Rebekah C.
Hartman, Daniel A.
Okoth, Edward
Githaka, Naftaly
Nene, Vishvanath
Poché, Richard M.
author_facet Lozano-Fuentes, Saul
Kading, Rebekah C.
Hartman, Daniel A.
Okoth, Edward
Githaka, Naftaly
Nene, Vishvanath
Poché, Richard M.
author_sort Lozano-Fuentes, Saul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although vector control strategies, such as insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) have been effective in Kenya the transmission of malaria continues to afflict western Kenya. This residual transmission is driven in part by Anopheles arabiensis, known for its opportunistic blood feeding behaviour and propensity to feed outdoors. The objective of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of the drug eprinomectin at reducing malaria vector density when applied to cattle (Bos indicus), the primary source of blood for An. arabiensis, under field conditions. METHODS: A pilot study was carried out in the Samia District of western Kenya from September to October of 2014. Treatment and control areas were randomly designated and comprised of 50 homes per study area. Before cattle treatments, baseline mosquito counts were performed after pyrethrum spray. Cows in the treatment area were administered topical applications of eprinomectin at 0.5 mg/kg once a week for two consecutive weeks. Mosquito collections were performed once each week for two weeks following the eprinomectin treatments. Mosquitoes were first identified morphologically and with molecular confirmation, then screened for sporozoite presence and host blood using PCR-based methods. RESULTS: The indoor resting density of An. arabiensis was significantly reduced by 38 % in the treatment area compared to the control area at one-week post-treatment (Control mean females per hut = 1.33 95 % CI [1.08, 1.64]; Treatment = 0.79 [0.56, 1.07]). An increase in the indoor resting density of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles funestus s.s. was observed in the treatment area in the absence of An. arabiensis. At two weeks post-treatment, the total number of mosquitoes for any species per hut was not significantly different between the treatment and control areas. No change was observed in An. arabiensis host preference as a result of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic drugs may be an important tool by which to supplement existing vector control interventions by significantly impacting outdoor malaria transmission driven by An. arabiensis through the treatment of cattle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4912782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49127822016-06-19 Evaluation of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against Anopheles arabiensis when administered to Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) under field conditions Lozano-Fuentes, Saul Kading, Rebekah C. Hartman, Daniel A. Okoth, Edward Githaka, Naftaly Nene, Vishvanath Poché, Richard M. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Although vector control strategies, such as insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) have been effective in Kenya the transmission of malaria continues to afflict western Kenya. This residual transmission is driven in part by Anopheles arabiensis, known for its opportunistic blood feeding behaviour and propensity to feed outdoors. The objective of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of the drug eprinomectin at reducing malaria vector density when applied to cattle (Bos indicus), the primary source of blood for An. arabiensis, under field conditions. METHODS: A pilot study was carried out in the Samia District of western Kenya from September to October of 2014. Treatment and control areas were randomly designated and comprised of 50 homes per study area. Before cattle treatments, baseline mosquito counts were performed after pyrethrum spray. Cows in the treatment area were administered topical applications of eprinomectin at 0.5 mg/kg once a week for two consecutive weeks. Mosquito collections were performed once each week for two weeks following the eprinomectin treatments. Mosquitoes were first identified morphologically and with molecular confirmation, then screened for sporozoite presence and host blood using PCR-based methods. RESULTS: The indoor resting density of An. arabiensis was significantly reduced by 38 % in the treatment area compared to the control area at one-week post-treatment (Control mean females per hut = 1.33 95 % CI [1.08, 1.64]; Treatment = 0.79 [0.56, 1.07]). An increase in the indoor resting density of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles funestus s.s. was observed in the treatment area in the absence of An. arabiensis. At two weeks post-treatment, the total number of mosquitoes for any species per hut was not significantly different between the treatment and control areas. No change was observed in An. arabiensis host preference as a result of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic drugs may be an important tool by which to supplement existing vector control interventions by significantly impacting outdoor malaria transmission driven by An. arabiensis through the treatment of cattle. BioMed Central 2016-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4912782/ /pubmed/27317557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1361-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lozano-Fuentes, Saul
Kading, Rebekah C.
Hartman, Daniel A.
Okoth, Edward
Githaka, Naftaly
Nene, Vishvanath
Poché, Richard M.
Evaluation of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against Anopheles arabiensis when administered to Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) under field conditions
title Evaluation of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against Anopheles arabiensis when administered to Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) under field conditions
title_full Evaluation of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against Anopheles arabiensis when administered to Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) under field conditions
title_fullStr Evaluation of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against Anopheles arabiensis when administered to Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) under field conditions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against Anopheles arabiensis when administered to Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) under field conditions
title_short Evaluation of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against Anopheles arabiensis when administered to Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) under field conditions
title_sort evaluation of a topical formulation of eprinomectin against anopheles arabiensis when administered to zebu cattle (bos indicus) under field conditions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27317557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1361-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lozanofuentessaul evaluationofatopicalformulationofeprinomectinagainstanophelesarabiensiswhenadministeredtozebucattlebosindicusunderfieldconditions
AT kadingrebekahc evaluationofatopicalformulationofeprinomectinagainstanophelesarabiensiswhenadministeredtozebucattlebosindicusunderfieldconditions
AT hartmandaniela evaluationofatopicalformulationofeprinomectinagainstanophelesarabiensiswhenadministeredtozebucattlebosindicusunderfieldconditions
AT okothedward evaluationofatopicalformulationofeprinomectinagainstanophelesarabiensiswhenadministeredtozebucattlebosindicusunderfieldconditions
AT githakanaftaly evaluationofatopicalformulationofeprinomectinagainstanophelesarabiensiswhenadministeredtozebucattlebosindicusunderfieldconditions
AT nenevishvanath evaluationofatopicalformulationofeprinomectinagainstanophelesarabiensiswhenadministeredtozebucattlebosindicusunderfieldconditions
AT pocherichardm evaluationofatopicalformulationofeprinomectinagainstanophelesarabiensiswhenadministeredtozebucattlebosindicusunderfieldconditions