Cargando…
The Influence of Irradiation Time and Layer Thickness on Elution of Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate from SDR® Bulk-Fill Composite
Objective. This study aimed to evaluate triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) elution from SDR bulk-fill composite. Methods. Three groups of samples were prepared, including samples polymerized in a 4 mm layer for 20 s, in a 4 mm layer for 40 s, and in a 2 mm layer for 20 s. Elution of TEGDMA i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27366742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3481723 |
_version_ | 1782438357630976000 |
---|---|
author | Łagocka, Ryta Jakubowska, Katarzyna Chlubek, Dariusz Buczkowska-Radlińska, Jadwiga |
author_facet | Łagocka, Ryta Jakubowska, Katarzyna Chlubek, Dariusz Buczkowska-Radlińska, Jadwiga |
author_sort | Łagocka, Ryta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. This study aimed to evaluate triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) elution from SDR bulk-fill composite. Methods. Three groups of samples were prepared, including samples polymerized in a 4 mm layer for 20 s, in a 4 mm layer for 40 s, and in a 2 mm layer for 20 s. Elution of TEGDMA into 100% ethanol, a 75% ethanol/water solution, and distilled water was studied. The TEGDMA concentration was measured using HPLC. Results. The TEGDMA concentration decreased in the following order: 100% ethanol > 75% ethanol > distilled water. Doubling the energy delivered to the 4 mm thick sample caused decrease (p < 0.05) in TEGDMA elution to distilled water. In ethanol solutions, the energy increase had no influence on TEGDMA elution. Decreasing the sample thickness resulted in decrease (p < 0.05) in TEGDMA elution for all the solutions. Conclusions. The concentration of eluted TEGDMA and the elution time were both strongly affected by the hydrophobicity of the solvent. Doubling the energy delivered to the 4 mm thick sample did not decrease the elution of TEGDMA but did decrease the amount of the monomer available to less aggressive solvents. Elution of TEGDMA was also correlated with the exposed sample surface area. Clinical Relevance. Decreasing the SDR layer thickness decreases TEGDMA elution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4913063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49130632016-06-30 The Influence of Irradiation Time and Layer Thickness on Elution of Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate from SDR® Bulk-Fill Composite Łagocka, Ryta Jakubowska, Katarzyna Chlubek, Dariusz Buczkowska-Radlińska, Jadwiga Biomed Res Int Research Article Objective. This study aimed to evaluate triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) elution from SDR bulk-fill composite. Methods. Three groups of samples were prepared, including samples polymerized in a 4 mm layer for 20 s, in a 4 mm layer for 40 s, and in a 2 mm layer for 20 s. Elution of TEGDMA into 100% ethanol, a 75% ethanol/water solution, and distilled water was studied. The TEGDMA concentration was measured using HPLC. Results. The TEGDMA concentration decreased in the following order: 100% ethanol > 75% ethanol > distilled water. Doubling the energy delivered to the 4 mm thick sample caused decrease (p < 0.05) in TEGDMA elution to distilled water. In ethanol solutions, the energy increase had no influence on TEGDMA elution. Decreasing the sample thickness resulted in decrease (p < 0.05) in TEGDMA elution for all the solutions. Conclusions. The concentration of eluted TEGDMA and the elution time were both strongly affected by the hydrophobicity of the solvent. Doubling the energy delivered to the 4 mm thick sample did not decrease the elution of TEGDMA but did decrease the amount of the monomer available to less aggressive solvents. Elution of TEGDMA was also correlated with the exposed sample surface area. Clinical Relevance. Decreasing the SDR layer thickness decreases TEGDMA elution. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4913063/ /pubmed/27366742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3481723 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ryta Łagocka et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Łagocka, Ryta Jakubowska, Katarzyna Chlubek, Dariusz Buczkowska-Radlińska, Jadwiga The Influence of Irradiation Time and Layer Thickness on Elution of Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate from SDR® Bulk-Fill Composite |
title | The Influence of Irradiation Time and Layer Thickness on Elution of Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate from SDR® Bulk-Fill Composite |
title_full | The Influence of Irradiation Time and Layer Thickness on Elution of Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate from SDR® Bulk-Fill Composite |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Irradiation Time and Layer Thickness on Elution of Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate from SDR® Bulk-Fill Composite |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Irradiation Time and Layer Thickness on Elution of Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate from SDR® Bulk-Fill Composite |
title_short | The Influence of Irradiation Time and Layer Thickness on Elution of Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate from SDR® Bulk-Fill Composite |
title_sort | influence of irradiation time and layer thickness on elution of triethylene glycol dimethacrylate from sdr® bulk-fill composite |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27366742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3481723 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT łagockaryta theinfluenceofirradiationtimeandlayerthicknessonelutionoftriethyleneglycoldimethacrylatefromsdrbulkfillcomposite AT jakubowskakatarzyna theinfluenceofirradiationtimeandlayerthicknessonelutionoftriethyleneglycoldimethacrylatefromsdrbulkfillcomposite AT chlubekdariusz theinfluenceofirradiationtimeandlayerthicknessonelutionoftriethyleneglycoldimethacrylatefromsdrbulkfillcomposite AT buczkowskaradlinskajadwiga theinfluenceofirradiationtimeandlayerthicknessonelutionoftriethyleneglycoldimethacrylatefromsdrbulkfillcomposite AT łagockaryta influenceofirradiationtimeandlayerthicknessonelutionoftriethyleneglycoldimethacrylatefromsdrbulkfillcomposite AT jakubowskakatarzyna influenceofirradiationtimeandlayerthicknessonelutionoftriethyleneglycoldimethacrylatefromsdrbulkfillcomposite AT chlubekdariusz influenceofirradiationtimeandlayerthicknessonelutionoftriethyleneglycoldimethacrylatefromsdrbulkfillcomposite AT buczkowskaradlinskajadwiga influenceofirradiationtimeandlayerthicknessonelutionoftriethyleneglycoldimethacrylatefromsdrbulkfillcomposite |