Cargando…

Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain

Health effects of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) vary by chemical composition, and composition can help to identify key PM(2.5) sources across urban areas. Further, this intra-urban spatial variation in concentrations and composition may vary with meteorological conditions (e.g., mixing height)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tunno, Brett J, Dalton, Rebecca, Michanowicz, Drew R, Shmool, Jessie L C, Kinnee, Ellen, Tripathy, Sheila, Cambal, Leah, Clougherty, Jane E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26507005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.59
_version_ 1782438376003076096
author Tunno, Brett J
Dalton, Rebecca
Michanowicz, Drew R
Shmool, Jessie L C
Kinnee, Ellen
Tripathy, Sheila
Cambal, Leah
Clougherty, Jane E
author_facet Tunno, Brett J
Dalton, Rebecca
Michanowicz, Drew R
Shmool, Jessie L C
Kinnee, Ellen
Tripathy, Sheila
Cambal, Leah
Clougherty, Jane E
author_sort Tunno, Brett J
collection PubMed
description Health effects of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) vary by chemical composition, and composition can help to identify key PM(2.5) sources across urban areas. Further, this intra-urban spatial variation in concentrations and composition may vary with meteorological conditions (e.g., mixing height). Accordingly, we hypothesized that spatial sampling during atmospheric inversions would help to better identify localized source effects, and reveal more distinct spatial patterns in key constituents. We designed a 2-year monitoring campaign to capture fine-scale intra-urban variability in PM(2.5) composition across Pittsburgh, PA, and compared both spatial patterns and source effects during “frequent inversion” hours vs 24-h weeklong averages. Using spatially distributed programmable monitors, and a geographic information systems (GIS)-based design, we collected PM(2.5) samples across 37 sampling locations per year to capture variation in local pollution sources (e.g., proximity to industry, traffic density) and terrain (e.g., elevation). We used inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine elemental composition, and unconstrained factor analysis to identify source suites by sampling scheme and season. We examined spatial patterning in source factors using land use regression (LUR), wherein GIS-based source indicators served to corroborate factor interpretations. Under both summer sampling regimes, and for winter inversion-focused sampling, we identified six source factors, characterized by tracers associated with brake and tire wear, steel-making, soil and road dust, coal, diesel exhaust, and vehicular emissions. For winter 24-h samples, four factors suggested traffic/fuel oil, traffic emissions, coal/industry, and steel-making sources. In LURs, as hypothesized, GIS-based source terms better explained spatial variability in inversion-focused samples, including a greater contribution from roadway, steel, and coal-related sources. Factor analysis produced source-related constituent suites under both sampling designs, though factors were more distinct under inversion-focused sampling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4913169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49131692016-06-29 Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain Tunno, Brett J Dalton, Rebecca Michanowicz, Drew R Shmool, Jessie L C Kinnee, Ellen Tripathy, Sheila Cambal, Leah Clougherty, Jane E J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Original Article Health effects of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) vary by chemical composition, and composition can help to identify key PM(2.5) sources across urban areas. Further, this intra-urban spatial variation in concentrations and composition may vary with meteorological conditions (e.g., mixing height). Accordingly, we hypothesized that spatial sampling during atmospheric inversions would help to better identify localized source effects, and reveal more distinct spatial patterns in key constituents. We designed a 2-year monitoring campaign to capture fine-scale intra-urban variability in PM(2.5) composition across Pittsburgh, PA, and compared both spatial patterns and source effects during “frequent inversion” hours vs 24-h weeklong averages. Using spatially distributed programmable monitors, and a geographic information systems (GIS)-based design, we collected PM(2.5) samples across 37 sampling locations per year to capture variation in local pollution sources (e.g., proximity to industry, traffic density) and terrain (e.g., elevation). We used inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine elemental composition, and unconstrained factor analysis to identify source suites by sampling scheme and season. We examined spatial patterning in source factors using land use regression (LUR), wherein GIS-based source indicators served to corroborate factor interpretations. Under both summer sampling regimes, and for winter inversion-focused sampling, we identified six source factors, characterized by tracers associated with brake and tire wear, steel-making, soil and road dust, coal, diesel exhaust, and vehicular emissions. For winter 24-h samples, four factors suggested traffic/fuel oil, traffic emissions, coal/industry, and steel-making sources. In LURs, as hypothesized, GIS-based source terms better explained spatial variability in inversion-focused samples, including a greater contribution from roadway, steel, and coal-related sources. Factor analysis produced source-related constituent suites under both sampling designs, though factors were more distinct under inversion-focused sampling. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4913169/ /pubmed/26507005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.59 Text en Copyright © 2016 Nature America, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Tunno, Brett J
Dalton, Rebecca
Michanowicz, Drew R
Shmool, Jessie L C
Kinnee, Ellen
Tripathy, Sheila
Cambal, Leah
Clougherty, Jane E
Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain
title Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain
title_full Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain
title_fullStr Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain
title_full_unstemmed Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain
title_short Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain
title_sort spatial patterning in pm(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26507005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.59
work_keys_str_mv AT tunnobrettj spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain
AT daltonrebecca spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain
AT michanowiczdrewr spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain
AT shmooljessielc spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain
AT kinneeellen spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain
AT tripathysheila spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain
AT camballeah spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain
AT cloughertyjanee spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain