Cargando…
Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain
Health effects of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) vary by chemical composition, and composition can help to identify key PM(2.5) sources across urban areas. Further, this intra-urban spatial variation in concentrations and composition may vary with meteorological conditions (e.g., mixing height)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26507005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.59 |
_version_ | 1782438376003076096 |
---|---|
author | Tunno, Brett J Dalton, Rebecca Michanowicz, Drew R Shmool, Jessie L C Kinnee, Ellen Tripathy, Sheila Cambal, Leah Clougherty, Jane E |
author_facet | Tunno, Brett J Dalton, Rebecca Michanowicz, Drew R Shmool, Jessie L C Kinnee, Ellen Tripathy, Sheila Cambal, Leah Clougherty, Jane E |
author_sort | Tunno, Brett J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Health effects of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) vary by chemical composition, and composition can help to identify key PM(2.5) sources across urban areas. Further, this intra-urban spatial variation in concentrations and composition may vary with meteorological conditions (e.g., mixing height). Accordingly, we hypothesized that spatial sampling during atmospheric inversions would help to better identify localized source effects, and reveal more distinct spatial patterns in key constituents. We designed a 2-year monitoring campaign to capture fine-scale intra-urban variability in PM(2.5) composition across Pittsburgh, PA, and compared both spatial patterns and source effects during “frequent inversion” hours vs 24-h weeklong averages. Using spatially distributed programmable monitors, and a geographic information systems (GIS)-based design, we collected PM(2.5) samples across 37 sampling locations per year to capture variation in local pollution sources (e.g., proximity to industry, traffic density) and terrain (e.g., elevation). We used inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine elemental composition, and unconstrained factor analysis to identify source suites by sampling scheme and season. We examined spatial patterning in source factors using land use regression (LUR), wherein GIS-based source indicators served to corroborate factor interpretations. Under both summer sampling regimes, and for winter inversion-focused sampling, we identified six source factors, characterized by tracers associated with brake and tire wear, steel-making, soil and road dust, coal, diesel exhaust, and vehicular emissions. For winter 24-h samples, four factors suggested traffic/fuel oil, traffic emissions, coal/industry, and steel-making sources. In LURs, as hypothesized, GIS-based source terms better explained spatial variability in inversion-focused samples, including a greater contribution from roadway, steel, and coal-related sources. Factor analysis produced source-related constituent suites under both sampling designs, though factors were more distinct under inversion-focused sampling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4913169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49131692016-06-29 Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain Tunno, Brett J Dalton, Rebecca Michanowicz, Drew R Shmool, Jessie L C Kinnee, Ellen Tripathy, Sheila Cambal, Leah Clougherty, Jane E J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Original Article Health effects of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) vary by chemical composition, and composition can help to identify key PM(2.5) sources across urban areas. Further, this intra-urban spatial variation in concentrations and composition may vary with meteorological conditions (e.g., mixing height). Accordingly, we hypothesized that spatial sampling during atmospheric inversions would help to better identify localized source effects, and reveal more distinct spatial patterns in key constituents. We designed a 2-year monitoring campaign to capture fine-scale intra-urban variability in PM(2.5) composition across Pittsburgh, PA, and compared both spatial patterns and source effects during “frequent inversion” hours vs 24-h weeklong averages. Using spatially distributed programmable monitors, and a geographic information systems (GIS)-based design, we collected PM(2.5) samples across 37 sampling locations per year to capture variation in local pollution sources (e.g., proximity to industry, traffic density) and terrain (e.g., elevation). We used inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine elemental composition, and unconstrained factor analysis to identify source suites by sampling scheme and season. We examined spatial patterning in source factors using land use regression (LUR), wherein GIS-based source indicators served to corroborate factor interpretations. Under both summer sampling regimes, and for winter inversion-focused sampling, we identified six source factors, characterized by tracers associated with brake and tire wear, steel-making, soil and road dust, coal, diesel exhaust, and vehicular emissions. For winter 24-h samples, four factors suggested traffic/fuel oil, traffic emissions, coal/industry, and steel-making sources. In LURs, as hypothesized, GIS-based source terms better explained spatial variability in inversion-focused samples, including a greater contribution from roadway, steel, and coal-related sources. Factor analysis produced source-related constituent suites under both sampling designs, though factors were more distinct under inversion-focused sampling. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06 2015-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4913169/ /pubmed/26507005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.59 Text en Copyright © 2016 Nature America, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tunno, Brett J Dalton, Rebecca Michanowicz, Drew R Shmool, Jessie L C Kinnee, Ellen Tripathy, Sheila Cambal, Leah Clougherty, Jane E Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain |
title | Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain |
title_full | Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain |
title_fullStr | Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain |
title_short | Spatial patterning in PM(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain |
title_sort | spatial patterning in pm(2.5) constituents under an inversion-focused sampling design across an urban area of complex terrain |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26507005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.59 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tunnobrettj spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain AT daltonrebecca spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain AT michanowiczdrewr spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain AT shmooljessielc spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain AT kinneeellen spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain AT tripathysheila spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain AT camballeah spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain AT cloughertyjanee spatialpatterninginpm25constituentsunderaninversionfocusedsamplingdesignacrossanurbanareaofcomplexterrain |