Cargando…
Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123
Olfaction presents the ultimate challenge to molecular recognition as thousands of molecules have to be recognized by far fewer olfactory receptors. We have presented evidence that Drosophila readily distinguish odorants based on their molecular vibrations using a battery of behavioral assays sugges...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27351023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0152-15.2016 |
_version_ | 1782438383910387712 |
---|---|
author | Drimyli, Efstathia Gaitanidis, Alexandros Maniati, Klio Turin, Luca Skoulakis, Efthimios M. C. |
author_facet | Drimyli, Efstathia Gaitanidis, Alexandros Maniati, Klio Turin, Luca Skoulakis, Efthimios M. C. |
author_sort | Drimyli, Efstathia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Olfaction presents the ultimate challenge to molecular recognition as thousands of molecules have to be recognized by far fewer olfactory receptors. We have presented evidence that Drosophila readily distinguish odorants based on their molecular vibrations using a battery of behavioral assays suggesting engagement of a molecular vibration-sensing component. Here we interrogate electrophysiologically the antennae of four Drosophilids and demonstrate conserved differential response amplitudes to aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, nitriles, and their deuterated isotopologues. Certain deuterated odorants evoked larger electroantennogram (EAG) amplitudes, while the response to the normal odorant was elevated in others. Significantly, benzonitrile isotopologues were not distinguishable as predicted. This suggests that isotopologue-specific EAG amplitudes result from differential activation of specific olfactory receptors. In support of this, odorants with as few as two deuteria evoke distinct EAG amplitudes from their normal isotopologues, and this is independent of the size of the deuterated molecule. Importantly, we find no evidence that these isotopologue-specific amplitudes depend on perireceptor mechanisms or other pertinent physical property of the deuterated odorants. Rather, our results strongly suggest that Drosophilid olfactory receptors are activated by molecular vibrations differentiating similarly sized and shaped odorants in vivo, yielding sufficient differential information to drive behavioral choices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4913217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49132172016-06-27 Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123 Drimyli, Efstathia Gaitanidis, Alexandros Maniati, Klio Turin, Luca Skoulakis, Efthimios M. C. eNeuro New Research Olfaction presents the ultimate challenge to molecular recognition as thousands of molecules have to be recognized by far fewer olfactory receptors. We have presented evidence that Drosophila readily distinguish odorants based on their molecular vibrations using a battery of behavioral assays suggesting engagement of a molecular vibration-sensing component. Here we interrogate electrophysiologically the antennae of four Drosophilids and demonstrate conserved differential response amplitudes to aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, nitriles, and their deuterated isotopologues. Certain deuterated odorants evoked larger electroantennogram (EAG) amplitudes, while the response to the normal odorant was elevated in others. Significantly, benzonitrile isotopologues were not distinguishable as predicted. This suggests that isotopologue-specific EAG amplitudes result from differential activation of specific olfactory receptors. In support of this, odorants with as few as two deuteria evoke distinct EAG amplitudes from their normal isotopologues, and this is independent of the size of the deuterated molecule. Importantly, we find no evidence that these isotopologue-specific amplitudes depend on perireceptor mechanisms or other pertinent physical property of the deuterated odorants. Rather, our results strongly suggest that Drosophilid olfactory receptors are activated by molecular vibrations differentiating similarly sized and shaped odorants in vivo, yielding sufficient differential information to drive behavioral choices. Society for Neuroscience 2016-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4913217/ /pubmed/27351023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0152-15.2016 Text en Copyright © 2016 Drimyli et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | New Research Drimyli, Efstathia Gaitanidis, Alexandros Maniati, Klio Turin, Luca Skoulakis, Efthimios M. C. Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123 |
title | Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123 |
title_full | Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123 |
title_fullStr | Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123 |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123 |
title_short | Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123 |
title_sort | differential electrophysiological responses to odorant isotopologues in drosophilid antennae123 |
topic | New Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27351023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0152-15.2016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drimyliefstathia differentialelectrophysiologicalresponsestoodorantisotopologuesindrosophilidantennae123 AT gaitanidisalexandros differentialelectrophysiologicalresponsestoodorantisotopologuesindrosophilidantennae123 AT maniatiklio differentialelectrophysiologicalresponsestoodorantisotopologuesindrosophilidantennae123 AT turinluca differentialelectrophysiologicalresponsestoodorantisotopologuesindrosophilidantennae123 AT skoulakisefthimiosmc differentialelectrophysiologicalresponsestoodorantisotopologuesindrosophilidantennae123 |