Cargando…

Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123

Olfaction presents the ultimate challenge to molecular recognition as thousands of molecules have to be recognized by far fewer olfactory receptors. We have presented evidence that Drosophila readily distinguish odorants based on their molecular vibrations using a battery of behavioral assays sugges...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drimyli, Efstathia, Gaitanidis, Alexandros, Maniati, Klio, Turin, Luca, Skoulakis, Efthimios M. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27351023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0152-15.2016
_version_ 1782438383910387712
author Drimyli, Efstathia
Gaitanidis, Alexandros
Maniati, Klio
Turin, Luca
Skoulakis, Efthimios M. C.
author_facet Drimyli, Efstathia
Gaitanidis, Alexandros
Maniati, Klio
Turin, Luca
Skoulakis, Efthimios M. C.
author_sort Drimyli, Efstathia
collection PubMed
description Olfaction presents the ultimate challenge to molecular recognition as thousands of molecules have to be recognized by far fewer olfactory receptors. We have presented evidence that Drosophila readily distinguish odorants based on their molecular vibrations using a battery of behavioral assays suggesting engagement of a molecular vibration-sensing component. Here we interrogate electrophysiologically the antennae of four Drosophilids and demonstrate conserved differential response amplitudes to aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, nitriles, and their deuterated isotopologues. Certain deuterated odorants evoked larger electroantennogram (EAG) amplitudes, while the response to the normal odorant was elevated in others. Significantly, benzonitrile isotopologues were not distinguishable as predicted. This suggests that isotopologue-specific EAG amplitudes result from differential activation of specific olfactory receptors. In support of this, odorants with as few as two deuteria evoke distinct EAG amplitudes from their normal isotopologues, and this is independent of the size of the deuterated molecule. Importantly, we find no evidence that these isotopologue-specific amplitudes depend on perireceptor mechanisms or other pertinent physical property of the deuterated odorants. Rather, our results strongly suggest that Drosophilid olfactory receptors are activated by molecular vibrations differentiating similarly sized and shaped odorants in vivo, yielding sufficient differential information to drive behavioral choices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4913217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49132172016-06-27 Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123 Drimyli, Efstathia Gaitanidis, Alexandros Maniati, Klio Turin, Luca Skoulakis, Efthimios M. C. eNeuro New Research Olfaction presents the ultimate challenge to molecular recognition as thousands of molecules have to be recognized by far fewer olfactory receptors. We have presented evidence that Drosophila readily distinguish odorants based on their molecular vibrations using a battery of behavioral assays suggesting engagement of a molecular vibration-sensing component. Here we interrogate electrophysiologically the antennae of four Drosophilids and demonstrate conserved differential response amplitudes to aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, nitriles, and their deuterated isotopologues. Certain deuterated odorants evoked larger electroantennogram (EAG) amplitudes, while the response to the normal odorant was elevated in others. Significantly, benzonitrile isotopologues were not distinguishable as predicted. This suggests that isotopologue-specific EAG amplitudes result from differential activation of specific olfactory receptors. In support of this, odorants with as few as two deuteria evoke distinct EAG amplitudes from their normal isotopologues, and this is independent of the size of the deuterated molecule. Importantly, we find no evidence that these isotopologue-specific amplitudes depend on perireceptor mechanisms or other pertinent physical property of the deuterated odorants. Rather, our results strongly suggest that Drosophilid olfactory receptors are activated by molecular vibrations differentiating similarly sized and shaped odorants in vivo, yielding sufficient differential information to drive behavioral choices. Society for Neuroscience 2016-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4913217/ /pubmed/27351023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0152-15.2016 Text en Copyright © 2016 Drimyli et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle New Research
Drimyli, Efstathia
Gaitanidis, Alexandros
Maniati, Klio
Turin, Luca
Skoulakis, Efthimios M. C.
Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123
title Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123
title_full Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123
title_fullStr Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123
title_full_unstemmed Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123
title_short Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae123
title_sort differential electrophysiological responses to odorant isotopologues in drosophilid antennae123
topic New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27351023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0152-15.2016
work_keys_str_mv AT drimyliefstathia differentialelectrophysiologicalresponsestoodorantisotopologuesindrosophilidantennae123
AT gaitanidisalexandros differentialelectrophysiologicalresponsestoodorantisotopologuesindrosophilidantennae123
AT maniatiklio differentialelectrophysiologicalresponsestoodorantisotopologuesindrosophilidantennae123
AT turinluca differentialelectrophysiologicalresponsestoodorantisotopologuesindrosophilidantennae123
AT skoulakisefthimiosmc differentialelectrophysiologicalresponsestoodorantisotopologuesindrosophilidantennae123