Cargando…
Comparison of Serum Spec fPL(™) and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology
BACKGROUND: Feline pancreas‐specific lipase (Spec fPL) is considered a useful test for the antemortem diagnosis of pancreatitis in cats. A recent study found good agreement between the results of the Spec fPL and catalytic 1,2‐o‐dilauryl‐rac‐glycero‐3‐glutaric acid‐(6′‐methylresorufin) ester (DGGR)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26968865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13924 |
_version_ | 1782438420551827456 |
---|---|
author | Oppliger, S. Hilbe, M. Hartnack, S. Zini, E. Reusch, C.E. Kook, P.H. |
author_facet | Oppliger, S. Hilbe, M. Hartnack, S. Zini, E. Reusch, C.E. Kook, P.H. |
author_sort | Oppliger, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Feline pancreas‐specific lipase (Spec fPL) is considered a useful test for the antemortem diagnosis of pancreatitis in cats. A recent study found good agreement between the results of the Spec fPL and catalytic 1,2‐o‐dilauryl‐rac‐glycero‐3‐glutaric acid‐(6′‐methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) lipase assay. Prospective studies evaluating their sensitivity and specificity are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of the Spec fPL and the DGGR assays with a standardized histologic assessment of the pancreas. ANIMALS: Sixty client‐owned cats presented for necropsy. METHODS: Prospective study: Spec fPL concentrations and serum DGGR lipase activity were measured from the same blood sample. The pancreas was removed within 3 hours after euthanasia; serial transverse sections were made every 0.5 cm throughout the entire pancreas and reviewed using a histologic grading scheme. Sensitivity and specificity for the Spec fPL and DGGR assay results were determined. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity for the Spec fPL assay (cutoff value ≥5.4 μg/L) was 42.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 29.4–55.9%] and 100% (95% CI, 31.0–100.0%). The sensitivity and specificity for the DGGR assay (cutoff value >26 U/L) was 36.8 (95% CI, 24.7–50.7%) and 100% (95% CI, 31.0–100.0%). When lymphocytic inflammation up to 10% of a section was considered normal, the sensitivity and specificity for Spec fPL assay (cutoff value ≥5.4 μg/L) was 61.1 (95% CI, 36.1–81.7%) and 69.0% (95% CI, 52.8–81.9%) and the sensitivity and specificity for the DGGR assay (cutoff value >26 U/L) was 66.7 (95% CI, 41.2–85.6%) and 78.6% (95% CI, 62.8–89.2%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Both lipase assays performed similarly well, but their agreement with histologic pancreatic inflammation was limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4913568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49135682016-06-22 Comparison of Serum Spec fPL(™) and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology Oppliger, S. Hilbe, M. Hartnack, S. Zini, E. Reusch, C.E. Kook, P.H. J Vet Intern Med SMALL ANIMAL BACKGROUND: Feline pancreas‐specific lipase (Spec fPL) is considered a useful test for the antemortem diagnosis of pancreatitis in cats. A recent study found good agreement between the results of the Spec fPL and catalytic 1,2‐o‐dilauryl‐rac‐glycero‐3‐glutaric acid‐(6′‐methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) lipase assay. Prospective studies evaluating their sensitivity and specificity are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of the Spec fPL and the DGGR assays with a standardized histologic assessment of the pancreas. ANIMALS: Sixty client‐owned cats presented for necropsy. METHODS: Prospective study: Spec fPL concentrations and serum DGGR lipase activity were measured from the same blood sample. The pancreas was removed within 3 hours after euthanasia; serial transverse sections were made every 0.5 cm throughout the entire pancreas and reviewed using a histologic grading scheme. Sensitivity and specificity for the Spec fPL and DGGR assay results were determined. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity for the Spec fPL assay (cutoff value ≥5.4 μg/L) was 42.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 29.4–55.9%] and 100% (95% CI, 31.0–100.0%). The sensitivity and specificity for the DGGR assay (cutoff value >26 U/L) was 36.8 (95% CI, 24.7–50.7%) and 100% (95% CI, 31.0–100.0%). When lymphocytic inflammation up to 10% of a section was considered normal, the sensitivity and specificity for Spec fPL assay (cutoff value ≥5.4 μg/L) was 61.1 (95% CI, 36.1–81.7%) and 69.0% (95% CI, 52.8–81.9%) and the sensitivity and specificity for the DGGR assay (cutoff value >26 U/L) was 66.7 (95% CI, 41.2–85.6%) and 78.6% (95% CI, 62.8–89.2%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Both lipase assays performed similarly well, but their agreement with histologic pancreatic inflammation was limited. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-10 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4913568/ /pubmed/26968865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13924 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | SMALL ANIMAL Oppliger, S. Hilbe, M. Hartnack, S. Zini, E. Reusch, C.E. Kook, P.H. Comparison of Serum Spec fPL(™) and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology |
title | Comparison of Serum Spec fPL(™) and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology |
title_full | Comparison of Serum Spec fPL(™) and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Serum Spec fPL(™) and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Serum Spec fPL(™) and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology |
title_short | Comparison of Serum Spec fPL(™) and 1,2‐o‐Dilauryl‐Rac‐Glycero‐3‐Glutaric Acid‐(6′‐Methylresorufin) Ester Assay in 60 Cats Using Standardized Assessment of Pancreatic Histology |
title_sort | comparison of serum spec fpl(™) and 1,2‐o‐dilauryl‐rac‐glycero‐3‐glutaric acid‐(6′‐methylresorufin) ester assay in 60 cats using standardized assessment of pancreatic histology |
topic | SMALL ANIMAL |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4913568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26968865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oppligers comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology AT hilbem comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology AT hartnacks comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology AT zinie comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology AT reuschce comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology AT kookph comparisonofserumspecfpland12odilaurylracglycero3glutaricacid6methylresorufinesterassayin60catsusingstandardizedassessmentofpancreatichistology |