Cargando…

Accuracy of Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation upon Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record System

BACKGROUND: Detection, monitoring and treatment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are paramount to patient safety. The use of a comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) system has the potential to address inadequacies in ADR documentation and to facilitate ADR reporting to health agencies. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hui, Caleb, Vaillancourt, Regis, Bair, Lissa, Wong, Elaine, King, James W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4914540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-016-0071-8
_version_ 1782438568059207680
author Hui, Caleb
Vaillancourt, Regis
Bair, Lissa
Wong, Elaine
King, James W.
author_facet Hui, Caleb
Vaillancourt, Regis
Bair, Lissa
Wong, Elaine
King, James W.
author_sort Hui, Caleb
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Detection, monitoring and treatment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are paramount to patient safety. The use of a comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) system has the potential to address inadequacies in ADR documentation and to facilitate ADR reporting to health agencies. However, effective methods to maintain the quality of documented ADRs within an EHR have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of ADR documentation transfer throughout the implementation of a comprehensive EHR system. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of ADR documentation at a tertiary care pediatric hospital between January 2013 and June 2014. ADRs documented in the newly implemented ambulatory EHR, pharmacy system and hybrid health record system were extracted. Documentation inconsistencies and processes for managing ADR documentation within the EHR were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients with 260 unique ADRs were identified. Only 155 (60 %) of the identified ADRs were found in the ambulatory EHR system. The remaining 105 ADRs (40 %) were missing from the EHR when it was compared with the other systems. Seventy-two patients (63 %) returned for a follow-up visit, and each had their ADR documentation reviewed in the ambulatory EHR. Following the visit, 44 % of these ambulatory EHR records still included incorrect information. CONCLUSIONS: We identified discrepancies in ADR documentation within hospital systems, which need to be addressed as healthcare institutions transition to EHRs. Processes related to the transfer of ADR information into the EHR should be clearly defined. To improve the quality of ADR documentation, steps to force complete and continual ADR verification should be introduced at early stages of implementation of a new EHR, and all responsible providers should play a role. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-016-0071-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4914540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49145402016-07-06 Accuracy of Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation upon Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record System Hui, Caleb Vaillancourt, Regis Bair, Lissa Wong, Elaine King, James W. Drugs Real World Outcomes Short Communication BACKGROUND: Detection, monitoring and treatment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are paramount to patient safety. The use of a comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) system has the potential to address inadequacies in ADR documentation and to facilitate ADR reporting to health agencies. However, effective methods to maintain the quality of documented ADRs within an EHR have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of ADR documentation transfer throughout the implementation of a comprehensive EHR system. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of ADR documentation at a tertiary care pediatric hospital between January 2013 and June 2014. ADRs documented in the newly implemented ambulatory EHR, pharmacy system and hybrid health record system were extracted. Documentation inconsistencies and processes for managing ADR documentation within the EHR were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients with 260 unique ADRs were identified. Only 155 (60 %) of the identified ADRs were found in the ambulatory EHR system. The remaining 105 ADRs (40 %) were missing from the EHR when it was compared with the other systems. Seventy-two patients (63 %) returned for a follow-up visit, and each had their ADR documentation reviewed in the ambulatory EHR. Following the visit, 44 % of these ambulatory EHR records still included incorrect information. CONCLUSIONS: We identified discrepancies in ADR documentation within hospital systems, which need to be addressed as healthcare institutions transition to EHRs. Processes related to the transfer of ADR information into the EHR should be clearly defined. To improve the quality of ADR documentation, steps to force complete and continual ADR verification should be introduced at early stages of implementation of a new EHR, and all responsible providers should play a role. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-016-0071-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4914540/ /pubmed/27398302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-016-0071-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Hui, Caleb
Vaillancourt, Regis
Bair, Lissa
Wong, Elaine
King, James W.
Accuracy of Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation upon Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record System
title Accuracy of Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation upon Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record System
title_full Accuracy of Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation upon Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record System
title_fullStr Accuracy of Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation upon Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record System
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation upon Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record System
title_short Accuracy of Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation upon Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record System
title_sort accuracy of adverse drug reaction documentation upon implementation of an ambulatory electronic health record system
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4914540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-016-0071-8
work_keys_str_mv AT huicaleb accuracyofadversedrugreactiondocumentationuponimplementationofanambulatoryelectronichealthrecordsystem
AT vaillancourtregis accuracyofadversedrugreactiondocumentationuponimplementationofanambulatoryelectronichealthrecordsystem
AT bairlissa accuracyofadversedrugreactiondocumentationuponimplementationofanambulatoryelectronichealthrecordsystem
AT wongelaine accuracyofadversedrugreactiondocumentationuponimplementationofanambulatoryelectronichealthrecordsystem
AT kingjamesw accuracyofadversedrugreactiondocumentationuponimplementationofanambulatoryelectronichealthrecordsystem